Long-term implant retention after impacted elastic stable intramedullary nailing in pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures: a retrospective cohort study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.45693Keywords:
Elastic stable intramedullary nailing, Forearm, Fractures, Implants, Paediatric orthopaedicsAbstract
Background and purpose: In elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) for forearm fractures, nail protrusion may cause irritation-related implant removal. The primary aim was to evaluate implant retention after nail impaction, and secondarily to assess secondary procedures, complications, and protrusion as a predictor of removal.
Methods: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of children with diaphyseal forearm fractures treated with impacted ESIN between 2017 and 2024. Implant retention was defined as no nail removal at record review. Secondary procedures were unplanned operations, while complications were adverse events managed conservatively. Radiographic nail protrusion was measured as extraosseous nail length and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis to predict irritation-related implant removal.
Results: 160 children with diaphyseal forearm fractures were included. At a mean observation time of 5 years, 132/160 children retained their implants (83%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 76–88). Secondary procedures occurred in 30/160 patients (19%, CI 13–26), most commonly irritation-related implant removal (10%, CI 6–16) and refracture (6%, CI 3–10). Complications occurred in 19/160 patients (12%, CI 7–18), including superficial radial nerve symptoms (7/160; 4.4%) and irritation without implant removal (6/160; 3.8%). A protrusion threshold of 3.3 mm predicted irritation-related implant removal (AUC 0.79, CI 0.71–0.86; sensitivity 100%, CI 83–100; specificity 55%, CI 49–61). No irritation-related removals occurred below this threshold.
Conclusion: Impacted ESIN was associated with high long-term implant retention, although secondary procedures and complications occurred in about one-third of the patients. A protrusion threshold of 3 mm was linked to irritation-related removal and may guide implant retention.
Downloads
References
Reddy E, Sriwastwa A, Patel S, Gupta R, Parikh S N. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing for pediatric forearm fractures: a review article. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2025; 71: 103249. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103249
Hunt A, Judkins N, Biggs A, Sedgwick P, Hing C B, Yeo A. The use of flexible nails in the treatment of paediatric long bone fractures: experience at a level one paediatric trauma centre, a cohort study. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2024; 49:102355. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102355
Poutoglidou F, Metaxiotis D, Kazas C, Alvanos D, Mpeletsiotis A. Complications of elastic stable intramedullary nailing in pediatric forearm fractures, a systematic review. J Orthop 2020; 20: 125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.002
Lascombes P, Haumont T, Journeau P. Use and abuse of flexible intramedullary nailing in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 2006; 26(6): 827-34. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000235397.64783.d6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bpo.0000235397.64783.d6
Nisar A, Bhosale A, Madan S S, Flowers M J, Fernandes J A, Jones S. Complications of Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing for treating paediatric long bone fractures. J Orthop 2013; 10(1): 17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2013.01.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2013.01.003
Ligier J N, Metaizeau J P, Prévot J, Lascombes P. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988; 70(1): 74-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.70B1.3339064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.70B1.3339064
Peterson H A. Metallic implant removal in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25(1): 107-15. doi: 10.1097/00004694-200501000-00024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004694-200501000-00024
Busam M L, Esther R J, Obremskey W T. Hardware removal: indications and expectations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006; 14(2): 113-20. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200602000-00006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200602000-00006
Simanovsky N, Tair M A, Simanovsky N, Porat S. Removal of flexible titanium nails in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2006; 26(2): 188-92. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000218534.51609.aa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bpo.0000218534.51609.aa
Fernandez F F, Langendörfer M, Wirth T, Eberhardt O. Failures and complications in intramedullary nailing of children’s forearm fractures. J Child Orthop 2010; 4(2): 159-67. doi: 10.1007/s11832-010-0245-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-010-0245-y
Narayanan U G, Hyman J E, Wainwright A M, Rang M, Alman B A. Complications of elastic stable intramedullary nail fixation of pediatric femoral fractures, and how to avoid them. J Pediatr Orthop 2004; 24(4): 363-9. doi: 10.1097/00004694-200407000-00004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-200407000-00004
Morshed S, Humphrey M, Corrales L A, Millett M, Hoffinger S A. Retention of flexible intramedullary nails following treatment of pediatric femur fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007; 127(7): 509-14. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0286-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0286-y
Lyman A, Wenger D, Landin L. Pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures: epidemiology and treatment in an urban population during a 10-year period, with special attention to titanium elastic nailing and its complications. J Pediatr Orthop B 2016; 25(5): 439-46. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000278
von Elm E, Altman D G, Egger M, Pocock S J, Gøtzsche P C, Vandenbroucke J P; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007; 370(9596): 1453-7. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
Luhmann S J, Schootman M, Schoenecker P L, Dobbs M B, Gordon J E. Complications of titanium elastic nails for pediatric femoral shaft fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2003; 23(4): 443-7. PMID: 12826940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-200307000-00006
Liu J, Su Y. Factors which can influence elastic stable intramedullary nailing removal in healed bone cysts in children. Sci Rep 2024; 14(1): 11129. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61828-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61828-3
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jan Egil Brattgjerd, Christer Aasheim, Astrid Rosenberg, Christoffer Fotland, Vera Halvorsen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
