Postoperative drainage of knee arthroplasty is not necessary: A randomized study of 90 patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679808997781Abstract
We studied the management of postoperative drainage after total knee replacement (TKR). 90 primary total knee joint arthroplasties were prospectively randomized into 3 groups: a) no drain, b) an autotransfusion system, c) a standard disposable closed suction drainage system. We monitored hemoglobin and hematocrit values, drainage volume and transfusions (homologous and autologous), range of knee motion, knee swelling and hospital stay. Parameters were recorded preoperatively, days 0–8 and 4 months postoperatively. No significant differences were seen between the groups in any of the parameters measured. The results show no benefit from using postoperative drainage systems in knee arthroplasties. Savings of SEK 400 (USD 55) per patient would have resulted if drains had not been used at all.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
1998-01-01
How to Cite
Adalberth, G., Byström, S., Kolstad, K., Mallmin, H., & Milbrink, J. (1998). Postoperative drainage of knee arthroplasty is not necessary: A randomized study of 90 patients. Acta Orthopaedica, 69(5), 475–478. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679808997781
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
