The risk of revision using tourniquet or not in primary total knee replacement: an observational study from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register

Authors

  • Annette W-Dahl The Swedish Arthroplasty Register; Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4053-7358
  • Johan Kärrholm The Swedish Arthroplasty Register; Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4782-7999
  • Perna Ighani Arani The Swedish Arthroplasty Register; Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
  • Ola Rolfson The Swedish Arthroplasty Register; Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6534-1242

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.45363

Keywords:

Arthroplasty, Knee, Osteoarthrosis

Abstract

Background and purpose: The use of a tourniquet in knee replacement surgery is debated. Given the conflicting evidence, we aimed to compare the risk of revision after total knee replacements (TKR) with or without the use of tourniquet.
Methods: In this register based observational study, we included the 5 most common cemented primary TKR models due to osteoarthritis reported to the Swedish Arthroplasty Register 2010–2024 and followed them until December 31, 2024. The first revision for implant loosening was the primary outcome. We estimated the cumulative revision rate (CRR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the 1–Kaplan–Meier method. We examined the use of a tourniquet regarding the risk of revision using multiple Cox regression analysis to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) with CI and adjusted for potential confounding factors.
Results: Of the 149,616 TKRs included, 65,570 (44%) were with tourniquet and 84,046 (56%) without tourniquet. The CRR was similar at all time-points for all causes and infection; however, CRR started to increase at 6–7 years for implant loosening with use of a tourniquet. In the Cox regression analysis, the use of a. tourniquet was associated with an increased risk of revision for implant loosening after 5 years (HR 1.56, CI 1.06–2.30). There was no difference in revision for all causes (HR 1.07, CI 0.99–1.15) or infection (HR 1.08, CI 0.97–1.21).
Conclusion: The use of a tourniquet was associated with an increased risk of revision for implant loosening after 5 years, while no association was found for all-cause revision or infection. Our results do not support the use of a tourniquet in TKR as a strategy to reduce the risk of revision, either due to all causes, implant loosening, or infection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lu C, Song M, Chen J, Li C, Lin W, Ye G, et al. Does tourniquet use affect the periprosthetic bone cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15: 602. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02106-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02106-6

Farhan-Alanie M M, Lee Y, Underwood M, Metcalfe A, Wilkinson M J, Price A J, et al. Effect of tourniquet use on the risk of revision in total knee replacement surgery: an analysis of the National Joint Registry Data Set. BMJ Open 2021; 11: e045353. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045353

Abdel M P, Carender C N, Berry D J. Current practice trends in primary hip and knee arthroplasties among members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38(10): 1921-7.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.005

Norwegian Arthroplasty Register annual report 2024. Available from: https://www.helse-bergen.no/48d1eb/contentassets/9f19d57711ee4e60815d6b89e8e8472b/report2024.pdf

Dansk Knæalloplastik Register 2023 Årsrapport. Available from: https://data-sundk.dk/aarsrapporter/dkr/

Swedish Arthroplasty Register annual report 2025. Available from: https://registercentrum.blob.core.windows.net/slr/r/Ledprotesregistret-A-rsrapport-2025_1-1-rUSSbXPOb.pdf

Ahmed I, Chawla A, Underwood M, Price A. J, Metcalfe A, Hutchinson C, et al. Tourniquet use for knee replacement surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 12(12): CD012874. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012874.pub2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012874.pub2

Hoffmann J, Jansen J A, Bénard MR, Gademan M G J, Nelissen R G H H. Mid-term effect of total knee arthroplasty with and without tourniquet use on prosthesis survival, complications and functional outcome: a prospective cohort study of 511 total knee arthroplasties. Knee 2023; 41: 18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.12.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2022.12.012

Khan M, Lygre L S H, Badawy M, Husby O S, Hallan G, Höl P J, et al. Association of tourniquet use on short-term implant survival after primary total knee arthroplasty: a study of 24,249 knees from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2025; 96: 547-54. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.43981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43981

Magan A A, Haddad FS. Tourniquet use in knee surgery: is it time to move on? Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B(5): 805-6. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.103B5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B5.BJJ-2021-0293

Löf, the Swedish patient insurance. Available from: https://wp.lof.se/wp-content/uploads/Profylaktiskt-antibiotikum.pdf

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry annual report 2024. Available from: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/documents/10180/1798900/AOANJRR+2024+Annual+Report.pdf/9d0bfe03-2282-8fc8-a424-b8d9abb82b1f?t=1727666185313

Ledin H, Aspenberg P, Good L. Tourniquet use in total knee replacement does not improve fixation, but appears to reduce final range of motion. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(5): 499-503. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.727078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.727078

Molt M, Harsten A, Toksvig-Larsen S. The effect of tourniquet use on fixation quality in cemented total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized clinical controlled RSA trial. Knee 2014; 21(2): 396-401. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.10.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2013.10.008

Ejaz A, Laursen A C, Jakobsen T, Rasmussen S, Nielsen P T, Laursen M B. Absence of a tourniquet does not affect fixation of cemented TKA: a randomized RSA study of 70 patients. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30(12): 2128-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.058

Wainwright T W, Gill M, McDonald D A, Middleton R G, Reed M, Sahota O, et al. Consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Acta Orthop 2019; 91(1): 3-19. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1683790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1683790

Magan A A, Dunseath O, Armonis P, Fontalis A, Kayani B, Haddad FS. Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and the risk of infection: a meta‑analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Exp Orthop 2022; 9: 62. doi: 10.1186/s40634-022-00485-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-022-00485-9

Grigoras M, Boughton O, Cleary M, McKenna P, Rowan F E. Short-term outcomes of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without a tourniquet. SICOT J 2021; 7: 15. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2021019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021019

Johnsen M, Havik S, Schnell Husby V, Bjørgen Winther S, Foss O A, Schnell Husby O, et al. The use of tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty does not impact the functional outcome: a randomised controlled study. J Orthop Surg Res 2024; 19(1): 704. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05203-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05203-y

Published

2026-01-23

How to Cite

W-Dahl, A., Kärrholm, J., Arani, P. I., & Rolfson, O. (2026). The risk of revision using tourniquet or not in primary total knee replacement: an observational study from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthopaedica, 97, 53–59. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.45363

Issue

Section

Publications

Categories