Change in compensated patient injuries in the treatment of Achilles tendon rupture: a nationwide analysis from 2000 to 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44598Keywords:
Achilles tendon, Achilles tendon rupture, Finnish Patient Insurance Centre, Foot and ankle, Patient injuries, Patient safetyAbstract
Background and purpose: Over the last 2 decades, the treatment of Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) has shifted from surgery to non-surgical methods. We aimed to analyze whether this change in treatment methods has had an impact on the number of compensated patient injuries in Finland and the grounds for compensation. We also aimed to investigate where injuries occur along the treatment pathway.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Finnish Patient Insurance Centre’s insurance charts of compensated patient injuries in the treatment of ATR. Records of all compensated patient injury claims involving ATR from 2 periods in Finland: 2000–2006 (when 65% were treated surgically) and 2013–2019 (when 15% were treated surgically) were reviewed. Data included medical records, expert evaluations, and compensation decisions. Injuries were classified by when they occurred, and key contributing incidents were identified.
Results: From 2000–2006 (period 1) and 2013–2019 (period 2), there were 315 patient injury claims related to ATR treatment in Finland. Of these, 126 (40%) were compensated. In both periods, delay in diagnosis was the most common reason for compensation. The number of claims remained the same between the 2 periods, and the ratio of compensated injuries to total cases declined (0.70% to 0.62%, not significant). Between the periods, infection-related claims decreased, while those related to incorrect treatment pathways and surgical errors increased (P = 0.02).
Conclusion: The number of patient injuries has not risen in the past decade, while the number of infection injuries has decreased. Most patient injuries were related to a delay in diagnosis.
Downloads
References
Leino O, Keskinen H, Laaksonen I, Mäkelä K, Löyttyniemi E, Ekman E. Incidence and treatment trends of Achilles tendon ruptures in Finland: a nationwide study. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10(11): 23259671221131536. doi: 10.1177/23259671221131536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671221131536
Huttunen T T, Kannus P, Rolf C, Felländer-Tsai L, Mattila V M. Acute Achilles tendon ruptures: incidence of injury and surgery in Sweden between 2001 and 2012. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42(10): 2419-23. doi: 10.1177/0363546514540599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514540599
Lemme N J, Li N Y, DeFroda S F, Kleiner J, Owens B D. Epidemiology of Achilles tendon ruptures in the United States: athletic and nonathletic injuries from 2012 to 2016. Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6(11). doi: 10.1177/2325967118808238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118808238
Suchak A A, Bostick G, Reid D, Blitz S, Jomha N. The incidence of Achilles tendon ruptures in Edmonton, Canada. Foot Ankle Int 2005; 26(11): 932-6. doi: 10.1177/107110070502601106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070502601106
Lerch T D, Schwinghammer A, Schmaranzer F, Anwander H, Ecker T M, Schmid T. Return to sport and patient satisfaction at 5-year follow-up after nonoperative treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Int 2020; 41(7): 784-92. doi: 10.1177/1071100720919029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100720919029
Olsson N, Nilsson-Helander K, Karlsson J, Eriksson BI, Thomée R, Faxén E. Major functional deficits persist 2 years after acute Achilles tendon rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19(8): 1385-93. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1511-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1511-3
Cramer A, Ingelsrud L H, Hansen M S, Hölmich P, Barfod K W. Estimation of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Treatment Failure (TF) threshold values for the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after acute Achilles tendon rupture. J Foot Ankle Surg 2022; 61(3): 503-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.09.026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2021.09.026
Svedman S, Juthberg R, Edman G, Ackermann P W. Reduced time to surgery improves patient-reported outcome after Achilles tendon rupture. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46(12): 2929-34. doi: 10.1177/0363546518793655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518793655
Hartog B D D. Surgical strategies: delayed diagnosis or neglected Achilles’ tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Int 2008; 29(4): 456-63. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2008.0456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2008.0456
Glazebrook M, Rubinger D. Functional rehabilitation for nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Clin 2019; 24(3): 387-98. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2019.05.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2019.05.001
Costa M L, Achten J, Marian I R, Dutton S J, Lamb S E, Ollivere B, et al. Plaster cast versus functional brace for non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture (UKSTAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. Lancet 2020; 395(10222): 441-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32942-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32942-3
Heikkinen J. Recovery of calf muscle isokinetic strength after acute Achilles tendon rupture. [Oulu]: n yliopisto; 2017. (Acta Universitatis Ouluensis. D, Medica, 1424).
Myhrvold S B, Brouwer E F, Andresen T K M, Rydevik K, Amundsen M, Grün W. Nonoperative or surgical treatment of acute Achilles’ tendon rupture. N Engl J Med 2022; 386(15): 1409-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2108447
Ochen Y, Beks R B, Heijl M van, Hietbrink F, Leenen L P H, Velde D van der, et al. Operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2019; 364:k5120. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5120
Lantto I, Heikkinen J, Flinkkila T, Ohtonen P, Siira P, Laine V, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing surgical and nonsurgical treatments of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44(9): 2406-14. doi: 10.1177/0363546516651060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516651060
Hallinen M, Sallinen H, Keskinen H, Matilainen M, Ekman E. Regional variations in incidence and treatment trends of Achilles tendon ruptures in Finland: a nationwide study. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 401-6. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.41089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41089
PVK. Finnish Patient Insurance Centre. [Accessed October 23, 2025]. Available at, www.pvk.fi/en.
Patient Insurance Centre. Annual report 2023 [Internet] 2024 May [cited November 12, 2024]. Available from: https://www.pvk.fi/document/574017/EC7FD2B7D9A1F09ACA42B2E69FC3A54E8EDCFA0A154AB47731B9AC70441CC4A2
Helmiö P, Blomgren K, Lehtivuori T, Palonen R, Aaltonen L M. Towards better patient safety in otolaryngology: characteristics of patient injuries and their relationship with items on the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. Clin Otolaryngol 2015; 40(5): 443-8. doi: 10.1111/coa.12396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12396
Potilasvakuutuskeskus. Annual report 2024 [Internet] 2025 [cited April 7, 2025]. Available from: https://www.pvk.fi/document/612732/B74552252CA2C5442AD5B7342DF0226C03E63D70ABF5C24215A533E72CF537ED
Nyrhinen K M, Bister V, Helkamaa T, Schlenzka A, Sandelin H, Sandelin J, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-related patient injuries: a nationwide registry study in Finland. Acta Orthop 2019; 90(6): 596-601. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1678233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1678233
Sandelin H, Waris E, Hirvensalo E, Vasenius J, Huhtala H, Raatikainen T. Patient injury claims involving fractures of the distal radius. Acta Orthop 2018; 89(2): 240-5. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1427966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1427966
Sveen T M, Troelsen A, Barfod K W. Higher rate of compensation after surgical treatment versus conservative treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture. Dan Med J 2015; 62(4): A5046.
Patient Insurance Centre. Annual Report 2021. [cited March 19, 2025] Available from: https://www.pvk.fi/en
Dikert C C, Grahn P, Nietosvaara Y. Avoidable injuries in pediatric hand fractures: a 30-year review of compensation claims in Finland. Acta Orthop 2025; 96: 290-4. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.43084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43084
Haapasalo H, Peltoniemi U, Laine H J, Kannus P, Mattila V M. Treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture with a standardised protocol. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2018; 138(8): 1089-96. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2940-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2940-y
Wang D, Sandlin M I, Cohen J R, Lord E L, Petrigliano F A, SooHoo N F. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: an analysis of 12,570 patients in a large healthcare database. Foot Ankle Surg 2015; 21(4): 250-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.01.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2015.01.009
Holm C, Kjaer M, Eliasson P. Achilles tendon rupture – treatment and complications: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2015; 25(1): e1-10. doi: 10.1111/sms.12209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12209
Kingsley P. Achilles tendon rupture in atypical patient populations. Emerg Nurse 2016; 23(10): 34-6. doi: 10.7748/en.23.10.34.s24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/en.23.10.34.s24
Raikin S M, Garras D N, Krapchev P V. Achilles tendon injuries in a United States population. Foot Ankle Int 2013; 34(4): 475-80. doi: 10.1177/1071100713477621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100713477621
Svedman S, Marcano A, Ackermann P W, Felländer-Tsai L, Berg H E. Acute Achilles tendon ruptures between 2002–2021: sustained increased incidence, surgical decline and prolonged delay to surgery—a nationwide study of 53 688 ruptures in Sweden. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2024; 10(3): e001960. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001960
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ida Kiviranta, Marjukka Hallinen, Lauri Kaukonen, Elina Ekman, Joel Kostensalo, Päivi Helmiö, Heli Keskinen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
