Patellofemoral arthroplasty-patient demographics and revision causes compared with total and medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term follow-up data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

Authors

  • Harald Nagelgaard Omenås Coastal Hospital in Hagevik, Orthopaedic Department, Haukeland University Hospital, Hagavik, Norway
  • Einar Lindalen Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lovisenberg Deaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • Ove Nord Furnes The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8223-2515
  • Anne Marie Fenstad The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6429-0153
  • Mona Badawy Coastal Hospital in Hagevik, Orthopaedic Department, Haukeland University Hospital, Hagavik, Norway https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6529-1484

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44593

Keywords:

Arthroplasty, Knee

Abstract

Background and purpose: Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is a rare surgical procedure for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA). This study compares patient demographics, long-term survival rates, revision risks, and causes of revision in PFA with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).
Methods: Data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR) (1994–2022) included 725 PFA, 102,135 TKA, and 14,315 UKA procedures. We used Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis to calculate implant survival at 2, 5, 10, and 15 years and Cox regression adjusted for confounders to assess revision risks. Revision causes were analyzed for procedures after 2005.
Results: PFA patients were more often female (72%) than TKA (62%) and UKA (51%) patients and had a lower mean age (54.3 for PFA, 69.0 for TKA, and 65.6 for UKA). At 10 years, KM survival was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80.6–88.2) for PFA, 94% (CI 93.8–94.2) for TKA, and 84% (CI 83.6–85.1) for UKA. Among patients < 60 years, KM survival at 10 years was 84% (CI 79.4–88.1) for PFA, 90% (CI 89.3–90.4) for TKA, and 79% (CI 77.1–80.3) for UKA. In patients < 60 years with < 10 years’ follow-up, the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for revision were 0.9 for TKA and 1.7 for UKA compared with PFA. Adjusted HR for > 10 years’ follow-up showed lower revision risks for TKA with 0.3 and no significant difference for UKA (HR 0.9). Progression of OA was the leading cause of revision in PFA (49%).
Conclusion: PFA was predominantly performed in younger female patients. In patients < 60 years, PFA showed similar 10-year survival to TKA but inferior survival after 15 years. Revision rates for PFA are comparable to UKA but inferior to TKA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Davies A P, Vince A S, Shepstone L, Donell S T, Glasgow M M. The radiologic prevalence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002(402): 206-12. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200209000-00020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200209000-00020

Walker T, Perkinson B, Mihalko W M. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the other unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94(18): 1712-20. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.l.00539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00539

Fuller B C, Lonner J H, Berend K R, Berger R A, Gerlinger T L. Partial knee arthroplasty: the state of the art. Instructional course lectures 2021; 70: 235-46.

Leadbetter W B, Ragland P S, Mont M A. The appropriate use of patellofemoral arthroplasty: an analysis of reported indications, contraindications, and failures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 436: 91-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000172304.12533.41

Konan S, Haddad F S. Midterm outcome of Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty for posttraumatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31(12): 2657-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.005

Odgaard A, Madsen F, Kristensen P W, Kappel A, Fabrin J. The Mark Coventry Award: Patellofemoral arthroplasty results in better range of movement and early patient-reported outcomes than TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476(1): 87-100. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999.0000000000000017

Odgaard A, Kappel A, Madsen F, Kristensen P W, Stephensen S, Attarzadeh A P. Patellofemoral arthroplasty results in better time-weighted patient-reported outcomes after 6 years than TKA: a randomized controlled trial. CORR 2022; 480(9): 1707-18. doi: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002178

van der List J P, Chawla H, Villa J C, Pearle A D. Why do patellofemoral arthroplasties fail today? A systematic review. Knee 2017; 24(1): 2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.11.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2015.11.002

Lustig S. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2014; 100(1 Suppl): S35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.06.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.06.013

Liow M H, Goh G S, Tay D K, Chia SL, Lo N N, Yeo S J. Obesity and the absence of trochlear dysplasia increase the risk of revision in patellofemoral arthroplasty. Knee 2016; 23(2): 331-7. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.05.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2015.05.009

Bendixen N B, Eskelund P W, Odgaard A. Failure modes of patellofemoral arthroplasty-registries vs. clinical studies: a systematic review. Acta Orthop 2019; 90(5): 473-8. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1634865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1634865

Hamilton T W, Pandit H G, Lombardi A V, Adams J B, Oosthuizen C R, Clavé A, et al. Radiological decision aid to determine suitability for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. development and preliminary validation. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B(10 Supple B): 3-10. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.98b10.bjj-2016-0432.r1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.BJJ-2016-0432.R1

Norwegian Arthroplasty Register Report 2024 English. Available from: https://www.helse-bergen.no/48d1eb/contentassets/9f19d57711ee4e60815d6b89e8e8472b/report2024.pdf

Elkjær Christensen A L, Bredgaard Jensen C, Gromov K, Mark-Christensen T, Lindberg-Larsen M, Troelsen A. Champions in usage of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: the story behind the Danish success. Orthopadie (Heidelb) 2024; 53(4): 246-54. doi: 10.1007/s00132-024-04477-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-024-04477-8

Lewis P L, Tudor F, Lorimer M, McKie J, Bohm E, Robertsson O, et al. Short-term revision risk of patellofemoral arthroplasty is high: an analysis from eight large arthroplasty registries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478(6): 1222-31. doi: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001268

von Elm E, Altman D G, Egger M, Pocock S J, Gøtzsche P C, Vandenbroucke J P. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61(4): 344-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008

French J M R, Deere K, Whitehouse M R, Pegg D J, Ciminello E, Valentini R, et al. The completeness of national hip and knee replacement registers. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 654-60. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42303

Christensen R, Ranstam J, Overgaard S, Wagner P. Guidelines for a structured manuscript: statistical methods and reporting in biomedical research journals. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 243-9. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.11656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.11656

Willekens P, Victor J, Verbruggen D, Vande Kerckhove M, Van Der Straeten C. Outcome of patellofemoral arthroplasty, determinants for success. Acta Orthop Belg 2015; 81(4): 759-67. PMID: 26790802

Ackroyd C E, Newman J H, Evans R, Eldridge J D, Joslin C C. The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty: five-year survivorship and functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89(3): 310-15. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.89b3.18062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B3.18062

Fredborg C, Odgaard A, Sørensen J. Patellofemoral arthroplasty is cheaper and more effective in the short term than total knee arthroplasty for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis: cost-effectiveness analysis based on a randomized trial. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B(4): 449-57. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.102b4.bjj-2018-1580.r3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2018-1580.R3

Williams D P, Pandit H G, Athanasou N A, Murray D W, Gibbons C L. Early revisions of the Femoro-Patella Vialla joint replacement. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-b(6): 793-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b6.31355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B6.31355

Osarumwense D, Syed F, Nzeako O, Akilapa S, Zubair O, Waite J. Patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: early results and functional outcome of the Zimmer Gender Solutions patello-femoral joint system. Clin Orthop Surg 2017; 9(3): 295-302. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.295

Cardenas C, Wascher D C. Outcomes of isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty. J ISAKOS 2024; 9(4): 796-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.11.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2023.11.005

Published

2025-09-02

How to Cite

Omenås, H. N., Lindalen, E., Furnes, O. N., Fenstad, A. M., & Badawy, M. (2025). Patellofemoral arthroplasty-patient demographics and revision causes compared with total and medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term follow-up data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthopaedica, 96, 671–676. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44593

Issue

Section

Publications

Categories