Long-term migration of monoblock vs modular design in uncemented total knee arthroplasty: a secondary report of a randomized trial using radiostereometric analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43904Keywords:
Arthroplasty, Implants, Knee, OsteoarthrosisAbstract
Background and purpose: Backside wear of the polyethylene insert in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been described to produce clinically significant levels of polyethylene debris, which can lead to aseptic loosening and osteolysis. Monoblock design eliminates backside wear of the polyethylene and therefore could improve long-term fixation. This randomized clinical trial (RCT) using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) compares micromotion of monoblock and modular polyethylene inserts with 7 years’ follow-up.
Methods: 65 patients (mean age 61 years) were randomized to receive either monoblock (n = 32) or modular (n = 33) uncemented trabecular metal tibial components. 35 patients (monoblock = 18, and modular = 17) completed 7 years’ follow-up. The primary endpoint of the study was maximum total point motion (MTPM). Implant translation and rotation are reported as secondary endpoints.
Results: After 84 months, the modular group had a statistically significant higher mean MTPM of 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90–1.41) mm compared with the monoblock group of 0.78 (CI 0.55–0.88) mm (P = 0.02). However, there was no difference in continuous migration (from 12–84 months), which was 0.13 mm in the monoblock group and 0.16 mm in the modular group.
Conclusion: There was significantly lower early migration in the monoblock group compared with the modular group but no difference in continuous migration after 12 months, which confirms the finding of previous publications.
Downloads
References
Sharkey P F, Lichstein P M, Shen C, Tokarski A T, Parvizi J. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today: has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 1774-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.024
Thiele K, Perka C, Matziolis G, Mayr H O, Sostheim M, Hube R. Current failure mechanisms after knee arthroplasty have changed: polyethylene wear is less common in revision surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97: 715-20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.01534
Gallo J, Goodman S B, Konttinen Y T, Wimmer M A, Holinka M. Osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: a review of pathogenetic mechanisms. Acta Biomater 2013; 9: 8046-58. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.05.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.05.005
Jacobs J J, Roebuck K A, Archibeck M, Hallab N J, Glant T T. Osteolysis: basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001: 71-7. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200112000-00008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200112000-00008
Peters P C, Engh G A, Dwyer K A, Vinh T N. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: 864-76. PMID: 1634576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199274060-00007
Holleyman R J, Scholes S C, Weir D, Jameson S S, Holland J, Joyce T J, et al. Changes in surface topography at the TKA backside articulation following in vivo service: a retrieval analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23: 3523-31. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3197-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3197-9
Pijls B G, Valstar E R, Nouta K-A, Plevier J W, Fiocco M, Middeldorp S, et al. Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 2012; 83: 614-24. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.747052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.747052
Wilson D A J, Richardson G, Hennigar A W, Dunbar M J. Continued stabilization of trabecular metal tibial monoblock total knee arthroplasty components at 5 years—measured with radiostereometric analysis. Acta Orthop 2012; 83: 36-40. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.645196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.645196
Henricson A, Nilsson K G. Trabecular metal tibial knee component still stable at 10 years. Acta Orthop 2016; 87: 504-10. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1205169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1205169
Dunbar M J, Wilson D A J, Hennigar A W, Amirault J D, Gross M, Reardon G P. Fixation of a trabecular metal knee arthroplasty component: a prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 1578-86. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00282
Puijk R, Singh J, Puijk R H, Laende E K, Plevier J W M, Nolte P A, et al. Evaluation and refinement of thresholds for early migration of total knee replacements as an estimator of late aseptic loosening: an updated systematic review of RSA and survival studies. Acta Orthop 2025; 96: 1-10. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42574
Puijk R, Koster L A, Pijls B G C W, Singh J, Schager M, Kaptein B L, et al. 5-year migration and inducible displacement of the uncemented LCS and ATTUNE rotating platform knee systems: a secondary report of a randomized controlled RSA trial. Acta Orthop 2025; 96: 59-65. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42744
Andersen M R, Winther N, Lind T, SchrøDer H, Flivik G, Petersen M M. Monoblock versus modular polyethylene insert in uncemented total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2016; 87: 607-14. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1233654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1233654
Kaptein B L, Pijls B, Koster L, Kärrholm J, Hull M, Niesen A, et al. Guideline for RSA and CT-RSA implant migration measurements: an update of standardizations and recommendations. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 256-67. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40709
Ryd L, Albrektsson B E, Carlsson L, Dansgård F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, et al. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77:377-83. PMID: 7744919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.77B3.7744919
Wojtowicz R, Henricson A, Nilsson K G, Crnalic S. Uncemented monoblock trabecular metal posterior stabilized high-flex total knee arthroplasty: similar pattern of migration to the cruciate-retaining design—a prospective radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and clinical evaluation of 40 patients (49 knees) 60 years or younger with 9 years’ follow-up. Acta Orthop 2019; 90: 460-6. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1626097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1626097
Puijk R, Puijk R H, Laende E K, Dunbar M J, Plevier J W M, Nolte P A, et al. 6-month migration sufficient for evaluation of total knee replacements: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 577-87. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.24579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.24579
Hanna S A, Somerville L, McCalden R W, Naudie D D, MacDonald S J. Highly cross-linked polyethylene decreases the rate of revision of total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional polyethylene at 13 years’ follow-up. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B: 28-32. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36527
Shen C, Tang Z-H, Hu J-Z, Zou G-Y, Xiao R-C, Yan D-X. Does cross-linked polyethylene decrease the revision rate of total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional polyethylene? A meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2014; 100: 745-50. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.015
Kuzyk P R T, Saccone M, Sprague S, Simunovic N, Bhandari M, Schemitsch E H. Cross-linked versus conventional polyethylene for total hip replacement: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93: 593-600. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.25908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.25908
Gkiatas I, Karasavvidis T, Sharma A K, Xiang W, Malahias M-A, Chalmers B P, et al. Highly cross-linked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with a lower rate of revision for aseptic loosening: a meta-analysis of 962,467 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142: 1177-84. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03887-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03887-z
Abulhail S, Hameed S, Abousamhadaneh M, Al Haneedi G, Al Ateeq Aldosari M. Trabecular metal monoblock versus modular tibial trays in total knee arthroplasty: meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Int Orthop 2022; 46: 2509-16. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05553-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05553-4
Sheridan G A, Clesham K, Garbuz D S, Masri B A. Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) is equivalent to conventional polyethylene (CPE) in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee 2021; 33: 318-26. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.10.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2021.10.005
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mikkel Rathsach Andersen, Müjgan Yilmaz, Nikolaj Winther, Thomas Lind, Henrik Schrøder, Gunnar FLIVIK Flivik, Michael Mørk Petersen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
