Radiostereometric measurement of implant migration in robotically assisted vs conventional bi-cruciate stabilized cemented total knee arthroplasty: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43081Keywords:
Arthroplasty, Conventional, Implants, Knee, Migration, Robotic, RSAAbstract
Background and purpose: Robotically assisted computer navigation (robotic) has been developed to improve the positioning in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), attempting to achieve better functional results and longevity of the prostheses. However, the benefit of robotics is still controversial. The aim of our study was to compare migration between robotic and conventional techniques in cemented bi-cruciate stabilized TKAs, using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) based on a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Methods: We enrolled 60 TKA patients from one hospital (2020–2021), with osteoarthritis or arthritic disease. The patients were examined up to 24 months after the surgery, to estimate the mechanical stability of the tibial component. The maximum total point motion (MTPM) representing the magnitude of migration, the largest negative (subsidence) and positive (lift-off) value for y-translation, and prosthetic rotations were measured. The migration in the 2 groups was compared and the precision evaluated.
Results: 51 RSA marked TKAs were available for a comparison of tibial migration between robotically assisted (n = 26) and conventional operations (n = 25). The MTPM in the first year was 0.44 mm and 0.64 mm, and at 24 months 0.46 mm and 0.75 mm, for the conventional and the robotic groups, respectively. The robotic group migrated more than the conventional group at 2 years, 0.21 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05–0.44; P = 0.01). The overall median MTPM for the investigated implants (both groups) up to 12 months was 0.54 mm (CI 0.44–0.63), and 0.19 mm between 12 and 24 months (CI 0.16–0.22). The magnitude of migration and rotation around the 3 axes was small for both groups, but flexion/extension migration of the tibial component was slightly higher in the robotic group 0.14° (CI 0.00–0.33; P = 0.049).
Conclusion: MTPM and flexion/extension migrations of the tibial component were higher for the robotic group, up to 24 months. The overall migration pattern for the bi-cruciate stabilized implant was acceptable.
Downloads
References
Hamel M B, Toth M, Legedza A, Rosen M P. Joint replacement surgery in elderly patients with severe osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: decision making, postoperative recovery, and clinical outcomes. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 1430-40. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.168.13.1430
Bourne R B, Chesworth B M, Davis A M, Mahomed N N, Charron K D. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 57-63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9
Spencer J M, Chauhan S K, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver R J. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 477-80. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B418094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B4.18094
Kim Y H, Kim J S, Choi Y, Kwon O R. Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 14-19. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01700
Longstaff L M, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 570-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.002
Lad D G, Thilak J, Thadi M. Component alignment and functional outcome following computer assisted and jig based total knee arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop 2013; 47: 77-82. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.106915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.106915
Lutzner J, Dexel J, Kirschner S. No difference between computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year results of a prospective randomised study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21: 2241-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2608-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2608-7
Dyrhovden G S, Gothesen O, Lygre S H, Fenstad A M, Soras T E, Halvorsen S, et al. Is the use of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improving implant positioning and function? A comparative study of 198 knees operated at a Norwegian district hospital. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013; 14: 321. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-321
Blakeney W G, Khan R J, Palmer J L. Functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised trial comparing computer-assisted surgery with conventional techniques. Knee 2014; 21: 364-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.04.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2013.04.001
Gothesen O, Espehaug B, Havelin L I, Petursson G, Hallan G, Strom E, et al. Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B: 609-18. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B5.32516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B5.32516
Gothesen O, Espehaug B, Havelin L, Petursson G, Furnes O. Short-term outcome of 1,465 computer-navigated primary total knee replacements 2005–2008. Acta Orthop 2011; 82: 293-300. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.575743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.575743
Annual Report, Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Available from: https://www.kvalitetsregistre.no/sites/default/files/2022-09/%C3%85rsrapport%202021%20Nasjonalt%20Leddproteseregister%202021.pdf.2022
Schulz K F, Altman D G, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2010; 1: 100-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.72352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.72352
Kaptein B L, Pijls B, Koster L, Kärrholm J, Hull M, Niesen A, et al. Guideline for RSA and CT-RSA implant migration measurements: an update of standardizations and recommendations. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 256-67. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40709
Whiteside L A. Soft tissue balancing: the knee. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 23-7. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.33264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.33264
Shatrov J, Foissey C, Kafelov M, Batailler C, Gunst S, Servien E, Lustig S. Functional alignment philosophy in total knee arthroplasty: rationale and technique for the valgus morphotype using an image based robotic platform and individualized planning. J Pers Med 2023; 13. doi: 10.3390/jpm13020212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020212
Henricson A, Linder L, Nilsson K G. A trabecular metal tibial component in total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years: a two-year radiostereophotogrammetric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 1585-93. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.20797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.20797
Valstar E R, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Borlin N, Kärrholm J. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop 2005; 76: 563-72. doi: 10.1080/17453670510041574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670510041574
Ryd L, Albrektsson B E, Carlsson L, Dansgard F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, et al. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77: 377-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.77B3.7744919
Petursson G, Fenstad A M, Gothesen O, Haugan K, Dyrhovden G S, Hallan G, et al. Similar migration in computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2017; 88: 166-72. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1267835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1267835
Ranstam J, Ryd L, Önsten I. Accurate accuracy assessment: review of basic principles. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 106-8. doi: 10.1080/00016470052944017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470052944017
Campbell M J, Gardner M J. Calculating confidence intervals for some non-parametric analy-ses. Br Med J 1988; 296: 1454-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6634.1454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.296.6634.1454
Pijls B G, Valstar E R, Nouta K A, Plevier J W, Fiocco M, Middeldorp S, et al. Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 2012; 83: 614-24. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.747052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.747052
Puijk R, Singh J, Puijk R H, Laende E K, Plevier J W M, Nolte P A, et al. Evaluation and refinement of thresholds for early migration of total knee replacements as an estimator of late aseptic loosening: an updated systematic review of RSA and survival studies. Acta Orthop 2025; 96: 1-10. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42574
Niesen A E, Tirumalai P A, Howell S M, Hull M L. A new tibial insert design with ball-in-socket medial conformity and posterior cruciate ligament retention has low tibial baseplate migration after unrestricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty: a cohort study using radiostereometric analysis. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 758-64. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42489
Koster L A, Meinardi J E, Kaptein B L, Van der Linden-Van der Zwaag E, Nelissen R. Two-year RSA migration results of symmetrical and asymmetrical tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B: 855-63. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B5.BJJ-2020-1575.R2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B5.BJJ-2020-1575.R2
Puijk R, Sierevelt I N, Pijls B, Spekenbrink-Spooren A, Nolte P A. Increased risk of aseptic loosening for posterior stabilized compared with posterior cruciate-retaining uncemented total knee replacements: a cohort study of 13,667 knees from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 600-6. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.33283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.33283
Kärrholm J, Gill R H, Valstar E R. The history and future of radiostereometric analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 448: 10-21. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000224001.95141.fe. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000224001.95141.fe
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Øystein Skåden, Ove Nord Furnes, Stein Håkon Låstad Lygre, Irene Ohlen Moldestad, Geir Hallan, Anne Marie Fenstad, Paul Johan Høl, Øystein Johannes Gøthesen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
