Who should care about the patient’s next fracture? A treatment gap after shoulder fractures in the elderly

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.21273

Keywords:

Fracture Liaison Service, Fractures, Osteoporosis, Proximal humeral fractures, Proximal humerus fractures, Secondary fracture prevention, Shoulder

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bergh C, Möller M, Ekelund J, Brisby H. 30-day and 1-year mortality after skeletal fractures: a register study of 295,713 fractures at different locations. Acta Orthop 2021; 92(6): 739-45. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1959003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1959003

Brorson S, Palm H. Proximal humeral fractures: the choice of treatment. In: Falaschi P, Marsh D, editors. Orthogeriatrics. Cham, CH; 2021. p. 143–53. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-48126-1_10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48126-1_10

Kanis J A, Johnell O, Oden A, Sembo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Dawson A, et al. Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmö. Osteoporos Int 2000; 11(8): 669-74. doi: 10.1007/s001980070064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980070064

Olsson C, Nordqvist A, Petersson C J. Increased fragility in patients with fracture of the proximal humerus: a case control study. Bone 2004;34(6): 1072-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.01.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2004.01.009

Brorson S, Viberg B, Gundtoft P, Jalal B, Ohrt-Nissen S. Epidemiology and trends in management of acute proximal humeral fractures in adults: an observational study of 137,436 cases from the Danish National Patient Register, 1996–2018. Acta Orthop 2022; 93: 750-5. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.4578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.4578

Izquierdo-Avino R, Cebollada-Gadea L, Jordan-Jarque M, Bordonaba-Bosque D, López-Cabanas J A. Risk of osteoporotic fracture and refracture: the importance of index fracture site. Arch Osteoporos 2023; 18(1): 27. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01213-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-023-01213-1

Johansson H, Siggeirsdóttir K, Harvey N C, Odén A, Gudnason V, McCloskey E, et al. Imminent risk of fracture after fracture. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28(3): 775-80. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3868-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3868-0

Balasubramanian A, Zhang J, Chen L, Wenkert D, Daigle S G, Grauer A, et al. Risk of subsequent fracture after prior fracture among older women. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30(1): 79-92. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4732-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4732-1

Clinton J, Franta A, Polissar N L, Neradilek B, Mounce D, Fink H A, et al. Proximal humeral fracture as a risk factor for subsequent hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(3): 503-11. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01529

Frederiksen A, Abrahamsen B, Johansen P B, Sørensen H A. Danish, national cross-sectional observational study on the prevalence of prior major osteoporotic fractures in adults presenting with hip fracture: limitations and scope for fracture liaison services in prevention of hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29(1): 109-14. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4247-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4247-1

Montero-Odasso M, van der Velde N, Martin F C, Petrovic M, Tan M P, Ryg J et al. World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults:a global initiative. Age Ageing 2022; 51(9): afac205. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac205

Huntjens K M B, van Geel T A C M, van den Bergh J P W, van Helden S, Willems P, Winkens B, et al. Fracture liaison service: impact on subsequent nonvertebral fracture incidence and mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96(4): e29. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00223

Spross C, Kaestle N, Benninger E, Fornaro J, Erhardt J, Zdravkovic V, et al. Deltoid Tuberosity Index: a simple radiographic tool to assess local bone quality in proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(9): 3038-45. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4322-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4322-x

Tingart M J, Apreleva M, von Stechow D, Zurakowski D, Warner J J. The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85(4): 611-17. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.85b4.12843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.85B4.12843

Kralinger F, Blauth M, Goldhahn J, Käch K, Voigt C, Platz A, et al. The influence of local bone density on the outcome of one hundred and fifty proximal humeral fractures treated with a locking plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96(12):1026-32. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00028

Furuhata R, Tanji A, Oki S, Kamata Y. Influence of proximal humeral cortical bone thickness on the radiographic outcome after osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures: propensity matching score analysis. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2023; 14: 21514593231198644. doi: 10.1177/21514593231198645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593231198645

Brorson S. Locking plate osteosynthesis in geriatric shoulder fractures: why do we continue to perform a low-value procedure? Acta Orthop 2022; 93: 355-7. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.2208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.2208

Additional Files

Published

2023-10-13

How to Cite

Brorson, S. (2023). Who should care about the patient’s next fracture? A treatment gap after shoulder fractures in the elderly. Acta Orthopaedica, 94, 514–515. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.21273