Inferior performance of Boneloc® bone cement in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized study comparing Boneloc® with Palacos® using radiostereometry (RSA) in 19 patients

Abstract

We compared Boneloc® bone cement with conventional cement (Palacos®) in fixating the tibial component during 2–5 years in 19 patients with gonarthro-sis undergoing total knee arthroplasty in a prospective randomized study. Boneloc displayed significantly larger migration, subsidence and lift-off than Palacos. The difference was identifiable already within 3 months postoperatively, but became significant at 12 months. In the Boneloc group, all components showed subsidence of the posterior part and lift-off of the anterior part of the tibial component, whereas in the Palacos group, the locations of subsidence and lift-off were evenly distributed about the edge of the implant. At 5 years, both Boneloc knees so far investigated were clinical failures with high migration rates. We conclude that, even in total knee arthroplasty, there is a substantial risk that Boneloc leads to inferior clinical results, but later than in hip replacements.