Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompart-mental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative: 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses

Otto Robertsson; Lars Borgquist; Kaj Knutson; Stefan Lewold; Lars Lidgren

doi:10.3109/17453679909011257

Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompart-mental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative: 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses

Authors

Otto Robertsson
Lars Borgquist
Kaj Knutson
Stefan Lewold
Lars Lidgren

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679909011257

Abstract

No abstract available

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1999-01-01

How to Cite

Robertsson, O., Borgquist, L., Knutson, K., Lewold, S., & Lidgren, L. (1999). Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompart-mental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative: 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses. Acta Orthopaedica, 70(2), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679909011257

Download Citation

Issue

Acta Orthopaedica, Volume 70, Issue 2 (1999)

Section

Articles

License

Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.