No difference between daily and weekly pin site careA randomized study of 50 patients with external fixation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470310018234Abstract
Introduction: We investigated whether there were any differences in the frequency and severity of pin site infections by performing pin site care daily or once a week. We studied patients operated on for gonarthrosis by the hemicallotasis technique, using hydroxyapatite-coated pins in the metaphyseal bone and standard pins in the diaphyseal bone. Patients and methods: 50 patients were prospectively randomized to daily (n= 27) or weekly (n= 23) pin site care. We evaluated pin sites, the occurrence of pain (VAS), the use of antibiotics and analgesics and complications every week. Bacterial cultures were taken from each pin site at 1, 6 and 10 weeks and from the pins on removal. Results: We found no differences between daily or weekly pin site care as regards the frequency and severity of pin site infections, pain, or the use of antibiotics and analgesics. Grade I infections (Checketts-Otterburns classification) occurred around 11% of the pins and grade II infections around 4%. 70% of the bacterial cultures were negative. The most frequent bacteria were coagulase negative staphylococcus and corynebacterium. Antibiotics were given an average of 47 days. More problems occurred around the proximal pins. 5/200 (all proximal) pins were clinically loose on removal. Interpretation: Pin site care once a week seems appropriate.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2003-01-01
How to Cite
W-Dahl, A., Toksvig-Larsen, S., & Lindstrand, A. (2003). No difference between daily and weekly pin site careA randomized study of 50 patients with external fixation. Acta Orthopaedica, 74(6), 704–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470310018234
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
