The impact of functional sagittal pelvic tilt on CT-based hip dysplasia diagnostics in adults: a cross-sectional 3D simulation study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46974Keywords:
CT parameters, hip dysplasia, Pelvic tilt, Sagittal tiltAbstract
Background and purpose: Accurate acetabular coverage assessment is essential for diagnosing adult hip dysplasia. Computed tomography (CT) best evaluates 3-dimensional acetabular morphology but is typically acquired supine, while symptoms arise during weightbearing. This study evaluates how sagittal pelvic tilt affects CT-based acetabular parameters in adults with hip dysplasia and whether pelvic tilt causes clinically relevant measurement changes.
Methods: 3D-models from supine CT of 29 adults with hip dysplasia (lateral center–edge angle (LCEA) ≤ 25°) yielded 39 affected hips. LCEA, inclination (AI), anterior/posterior/horizontal acetabular sector angles (AASA, PASA, HASA), acetabular version (AV), extrusion index (EI), and total and loadbearing coverage were measured. Pelvic tilt was simulated in 5° increments from 30° anterior to 30° posterior around the hip centers and parameters were remeasured in each position. Differences < 2.5° were considered clinically irrelevant.
Results: Median supine LCEA was 21°, AI 50°, AASA 43°. Across −30° to +30° tilt, AASA/loadbearing coverage decreased, PASA/AV increased, LCEA/EI showed parabolic patterns, and HASA/total coverage remained stable. From supine to simulated upright, paired mean differences were: LCEA −1° (95% confidence interval [CI] −2 to 0), AASA −4° (CI −5 to −3), PASA +4° (CI 4 to 5), HASA 0° (CI −1 to 1), AV +4° (CI 3 to 4), AI +1° (CI −1 to 3), EI +2% (CI 0 to 4), total coverage 0% (CI 0 to 0), and loadbearing coverage −2% (CI –2 to –2).
Conclusion: Functional sagittal pelvic tilt resulted in generally small changes in CT-based acetabular measurements in dysplastic hips, which may be clinically relevant in borderline cases, particularly for AASA, PASA, acetabular version, and EI, whereas LCEA and AI were not significantly affected.
Downloads
References
Lespasio M J, Sultan AA, Piuzzi N S, Khlopas A, Husni M E, Muschler G F, et al. Hip osteoarthritis: a primer. Perm J 2018; 22: 17-084. doi: 10.7812/TPP/17-084.
Vahedi H, Alvand A, Kazemi S M, Azboy I, Parvizi J. The low-volume acetabulum: dysplasia in disguise. J Hip Preserv Surg 2018; 5(4): 399-403. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hny036.
Vinge R, Rogmark C, Wenger D, Overgaard S, Tiderius C J. Development of osteoarthritis in adults with untreated hip dysplasia: a longitudinal observational study. Acta Orthop 2026; 97: 685-90. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2026.46828.
Salih S, Grammatopoulos G, Burns S, Hall-Craggs M, Witt J. Do acetabular parameters measured on 2D imaging correlate with CT, and can lateral centre–edge angle predict femoral head coverage? Bone Jt Open 2022; 3(1): 12-19. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.31.BJO.
Chadayammuri V, Garabekyan T, Jesse M K, Pascual-Garrido C, Strickland C, Milligan K, et al. Measurement of lateral acetabular coverage: a comparison between CT and plain radiography. J Hip Preserv Surg 2015; 2(4): 392-400. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnv063.
Hanke M S, Schmaranzer F, Lerch T D, Steppacher S D, Siebenrock K A, Tannast M. Traditional imaging: plain X-rays, three-dimensional CT, and MR imaging in development dysplasia of the hip. In: Hip dysplasia: understanding and treating instability of the native hip. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 71-98.
Anda S, Terjesen T, Kvistad K A, Svenningsen S. Acetabular angles and femoral anteversion in dysplastic hips in adults: CT investigation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15(1): 115-20.
Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg 2005; 87(2): 260-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02043.
Uemura K, Takao M, Otake Y, Koyama K, Yokota F, Hamada H, et al. Change in pelvic sagittal inclination from supine to standing position before hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32(8): 2568-73. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.015.
Tachibana T, Fujii M, Kitamura K, Nakamura T, Nakashima Y. Does acetabular coverage vary between the supine and standing positions in patients with hip dysplasia? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477(11): 2455-66. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000898.
Tani T, Takao M, Uemura K, Otake Y, Hamada H, Ando W, et al. Posterior pelvic tilt from supine to standing in patients with symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Orthop Res 2020; 38(3): 578-87. doi: 10.1002/jor.24484.
Van Bosse H J, Lee D, Henderson E R, Sala D A, Feldman D S. Pelvic positioning creates error in CT acetabular measurements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469(6): 1683-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1827-9.
Hong K B, Lee W S, Kang K, Kang K T, Cho B W. Evaluation of lateral and anterior center–edge angles according to sex and anterior pelvic plane tilt angle: a three-dimensional quantitative analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18(1): 280. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03763-z.
Mast N H, Impellizzeri F, Keller S, Leunig M. Reliability and agreement of measures used in radiographic evaluation of the adult hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469(1): 188-99. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1447-9.
Snijders T E, Schlösser T P, van Gaalen S M, Castelein R M, Weinans H, de Gast A. Trigonometric algorithm defining the true three-dimensional acetabular cup orientation: correlation between measured and calculated cup orientation angles. JBJS Open Access 2018; 3(3): e0063. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00063.
Boel F, Riedstra N S, Tang J, Hanff D F, Ahedi H, Arbabi V, et al. Reliability and agreement of manual and automated morphological radiographic hip measurements. Osteoarthritis Cartilage Open 2024; 6(3): 100510. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100510.
Portinaro N M, Murray D W, Bhullar T P, Benson M K. Errors in measurement of acetabular index. J Pediatr Orthop 1995; 15(6): 780-4. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199511000-00010.
Grammatopoulos G, Salih S, Beaule P E, Witt J. Spinopelvic characteristics in acetabular retroversion: does pelvic tilt change after periacetabular osteotomy? Am J Sports Med 2020; 48(1): 181-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546519887737.
Bakhshayesh P, Zaghloul A, Sephton B M, Enocson A. A novel 3D technique to assess symmetry of hemi pelvises. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1): 18789. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75884-y.
Sakai S, Kutsuna T, Kono K, Kinoshita T, Mashima N, Takao M. Femoral head translation in borderline and definite dysplastic hips during weight-bearing: 2D/3D image registration analysis. J Exp Orthop 2023; 10(1): 126. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00707-8.
Fritz B, Agten C A, Boldt F K, Zingg P O, Pfirrmann C W, Sutter R. Acetabular coverage differs between standing and supine positions: model-based assessment of low-dose biplanar radiographs and comparison with CT. Eur Radiol 2019; 29(10): 5691-9.
Dandachli W, Kannan V, Richards R, Shah Z, Hall-Craggs M, Witt J. Analysis of cover of the femoral head in normal and dysplastic hips: new CT-based technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(11): 1428-34. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B11.20073.
Welton K L, Kraeutler M J, Garabekyan T, Mei-Dan O. Radiographic parameters of adult hip dysplasia. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11(2): 23259671231152868.
Verhaegen J C F, Devries Z, Rakhra K, Speirs A, Beaule P E, Grammatopoulos G. Which acetabular measurements most accurately differentiate between patients and controls? A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2024; 482(2): 259-74. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002768.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Milou Femie To Hüsken, Fianne Lissendorp, Joëll Magré, Koen Willemsen, Harrie Weinans, Ralph Sakkers, Jafar Nasrabadi, Vahid Arbabi, Joris Bekkers, Arno M ten Ham, Tom P C Schlösser, Bart C H van der Wal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PlumX (by Elsevier) is an altmetrics platform that tracks and visualizes the online attention, usage, captures, citations, and social media engagement.
