Nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture with 6- versus 8-week protocol: a single-center cohort study from Finland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46872Keywords:
Achilles tendon rupture, Conservative treatment, Functional rehabilitationAbstract
Background and purpose: Although nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) has become increasingly common, the optimal duration of immobilization and early functional rehabilitation remains uncertain. We aimed to compare outcomes of 8-week and 6-week nonoperative treatment protocols for ATR, with particular focus on re-rupture rates and treatment failure requiring surgery.
Methods: This register study included all university hospital-treated ATRs in the Northern Savo region, Finland, between 2014 and 2023. Patients were identified using ICD-10 and NOMESCO procedure codes. We compared outcomes between an 8-week nonoperative treatment protocol used in 2014–2018 and a 6-week protocol used in 2019–2023. Outcomes included patient demographics, treatment distribution, indications for surgery, and complications.
Results: Among 479 ATRs, 429/479 (90%) were treated nonoperatively. Operative treatment was mainly done in athletes. Operative treatment was performed in 32/251 (13%) patients in the 8-week protocol group and in 18/228 (7.9%) patients in the 6-week protocol group. Re-rupture rates were similar between the 8-week and 6-week protocols (7/251 [2.8%] vs 4/228 [1.8%] absolute risk difference −1.0 percentage point, 95% confidence interval −3.7 to 1.6). Operative treatment was mainly indicated for athletes, chronic ruptures, and re-ruptures, with a postoperative complication rate of 14%.
Conclusion: Outcomes regarding re-rupture and treatment failure following the 6-week nonoperative protocol were comparable to those observed with the 8-week protocol However, larger comparative studies in more diverse populations are needed to confirm the generalizability of these findings.
Downloads
References
Leino O, Keskinen H, Laaksonen I, Mäkelä K, Löyttyniemi E, Ekman E. Incidence and treatment trends of Achilles tendon ruptures in Finland: a nationwide study. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10(11): 23259671221131536. doi: 10.1177/23259671221131536.
Ho G, Tantigate D, Kirschenbaum J, Greisberg J K, Vosseller J T. Increasing age in Achilles rupture patients over time. Injury 2017; 48(7): 1701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.007.
Gianakos A L, Hartman H, Kerkhoffs G M M J, Calder J, Kennedy J G. Sex differences in biomechanical properties of the Achilles tendon may predispose men to higher risk of injury: a systematic review. J ISAKOS 2024; 9(2): 184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.11.001.
Ganestam A, Kallemose T, Troelsen A, Barfod K W. Increasing incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture and a noticeable decline in surgical treatment from 1994 to 2013: a nationwide registry study of 33,160 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24(12): 3730-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3544-5.
Svedman S, Marcano A, Ackermann P W, Felländer-Tsai L, Berg H E. Acute Achilles tendon ruptures between 2002–2021: sustained increased incidence, surgical decline and prolonged delay to surgery—a nationwide study of 53 688 ruptures in Sweden. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2024; 10(3): e001960. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001960.
Huttunen TT, Kannus P, Rolf C, Felländer-Tsai L, Mattila V M. Acute Achilles tendon ruptures: incidence of injury and surgery in Sweden between 2001 and 2012. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42(10): 2419-23. doi: 10.1177/0363546514540599.
Mattila V M, Huttunen T T, Haapasalo H, Sillanpää P, Malmivaara A, Pihlajamäki H. Declining incidence of surgery for Achilles tendon rupture follows publication of major RCTs: evidence-influenced change evident using the Finnish registry study. Br J Sports Med 2015; 49(16): 1084-6. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092756.
Reda Y, Farouk A, Abdelmonem I, El Shazly O A. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for acute Achilles’ tendon rupture: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Surg 2020; 26(3): 280-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2019.03.010.
Myhrvold S B, Brouwer E F, Andresen T K M, Rydevik K, Amundsen M, Grün W, et al. Nonoperative or surgical treatment of acute Achilles’ tendon rupture. N Engl J Med 2022; 386(15): 1409-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108447.
Fan L, Hu Y, Zhou L, Fu W. Surgical vs. nonoperative treatment for acute Achilles’ tendon rupture: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Surg 2024; 11: 1483584. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1483584.
Ghaddaf A A, Alomari M S, Alsharef J F, Alakkas E, Alshehri M S. Early versus late weightbearing in conservative management of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Injury 2022; 53(4): 1543-51. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.01.028.
Naskar R, Oliver L, Velazquez-Ruta P, Dhinsa B, Southgate C. Functional outcome of early weight bearing for acute Achilles tendon rupture treated conservatively in a weight-bearing orthosis. Foot Ankle Surg 2022; 28(5): 595-602. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.06.008.
Hutchison A M, Topliss C, Beard D, Evans R M, Williams P. The treatment of a rupture of the Achilles tendon using a dedicated management programme. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B(4): 510–5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B4.35314
Aujla R, Kumar A, Bhatia M. Non-surgical treatment of Achilles rupture: Does duration in functional weight bearing orthosis matter? Foot Ankle Surg 2016; 22(4): 254–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.11.003
Ochen Y, Beks R B, van Heijl M, Hietbrink F, Leenen L P H, van der Velde D, et al. Operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2019; 364:k5120. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5120.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ville Happonen, Anu Koivisto, Anssi Härkönen, Heikki Kröger
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PlumX (by Elsevier) is an altmetrics platform that tracks and visualizes the online attention, usage, captures, citations, and social media engagement.
