Time of diagnosis of congenital upper limb anomalies: a cohort study of 703 patients from a local registry in Norway

Authors

  • Ida N Sletten Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8884-3859
  • Mona I Winge Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
  • Jarkko Jokihaara Department of Hand Surgery, Tampere University Hospital and Tampere University, Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46807

Keywords:

Congenital upper limb anomaly, Genetic disorders, Paediatric orthopaedics, Prenatal ultrasonographic detection

Abstract

Background and purpose: Several European countries offer nationwide prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies. Few studies have examined prenatal detection of upper limb anomalies, and existing reports originate exclusively from high‑volume centers outside Europe. We aimed to assess the timing of diagnosis in patients with all Oberg–Manske–Tonkin diagnoses except tumorous dysplasias referred to the largest specialized unit in Norway, investigate prenatal detection rates, and explore associations between patient‑ and hospital‑related factors and prenatal detection.
Methods: We extracted data on timing of diagnosis according to Oberg–Manske–Tonkin phenotype, and patient- and hospital-related variables from the CULA (congenital upper limb anomaly) North Oslo Registry from 2018 to 2025. For patients with anomalies detected prenatally or at birth, we analyzed associations between patient- and hospital-related factors and prenatal detection rate by multivariable logistic regression.
Results: 703 consecutive patients were enrolled. 402 (57%) patients had their anomaly detected at birth and 252 (36%) later in life. Prenatal ultrasonography detected the upper limb anomaly in 49 (7.0%) of the patients. Among 426 patients with anomalies visible at birth whose mothers had at least 1 prenatal ultrasound scan, the examination detected the anomaly in 49 (12%). Among phenotypes observed in more than 5 patients, congenital contractures (amyoplasia, distal arthrogryposis), reduction deficiencies (transverse, radial, ulnar), and ulnar polydactyly had the highest detection rates. Prenatally detected cases were more often born in university hospitals and more frequently had bilateral upper limb involvement and/or associated anomalies than those diagnosed at birth.
Conclusion: 7.0% of the upper limb anomalies were detected prenatally, 57% at birth, and 36% later in life. Prenatal detection rates were lower than those reported from larger non-European hand units, likely due to the inclusion of all upper limb anomaly diagnoses in this study and Norway’s decentralized prenatal care system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ekblom A G, Laurell T, Arner M. Epidemiology of congenital upper limb anomalies in Stockholm, Sweden, 1997 to 2007: application of the Oberg, Manske, and Tonkin classification. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39(2): 237-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.11.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.11.014

Bae D S, Barnewolt C E, Jennings R W. Prenatal diagnosis and treatment of congenital differences of the hand and upper limb. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(Suppl 4): 31-9. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.I.00072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.00072

Dicke J M, Piper S L, Goldfarb C A. The utility of ultrasound for the detection of fetal limb abnormalities: a 20-year single-center experience. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35(4): 348-53. doi: 10.1002/pd.4546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4546

Gray B L, Calfee R P, Dicke J M, Steffen J, Goldfarb C A. The utility of prenatal ultrasound as a screening tool for upper extremity congenital anomalies. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38(11): 2106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.08.091

O’Keefe D, Kennedy J, McCombe D, Coombs C, Hui L, Wilks D, et al. Pre-natal and post-natal diagnosis of congenital upper limb differences: the first 3 years of the Australian Hand Difference Register. J Paediatr Child Health 2022; 58(1): 122-8. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.15673

Piper S L, Dicke J M, Wall L B, Shen T S, Goldfarb C A. Prenatal detection of upper limb differences with obstetric ultrasound. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40(7): 1310-7.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.013

Vandenbroucke J P, von Elm E, Altman D G, Gøtzsche P C, Mulrow C D, Pocock S J, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147(8): W163-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-w1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-w1

Oslo University Hospital [Internet], Oslo [cited 2026 Jul 24]. Available from: https://www.oslo-universitetssykehus.no/avdelinger/ortopedisk-klinikk/ortopedisk-avdeling-rikshospitalet/nasjonal-behandlingstjeneste-for-dysmeli-i-overekstremiteten/

McCombe D, Wall L, Goldfarb C, Hülsemann W, Sletten I N, Wilks D, et al. Congenital upper limb difference patient registries: characteristics, comparisons and recommendations. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2025: 51(1): 111-18. doi: 10.1177/17531934251348360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251348360

Goldfarb C A, Ezaki M, Wall L B, Lam W L, Oberg K C. The Oberg–Manske-–Tonkin (OMT) classification of congenital upper extremities: update for 2020. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45(6): 542-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.01.002

Oberg K C. Classification of congenital upper limb anomalies: towards improved communication, diagnosis, and discovery. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2019; 44(1): 4-14. doi: 10.1177/1753193418801280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193418801280

Norwegian Directorate of Health [Internet], Oslo [cited 2026 Jul 24]. Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/retningslinjer/svangerskapsomsorgen/konsultasjoner-i-svangerskapsomsorgen#gravide-med-et-normalt-svangerskap-bor-fa-tilbud-om-et-basisprogram-praktisk-informasjon

Blix E. Fødeinstitusjoner i Norge i Store medisinske leksikon [Internet], Oslo [cited 2026 July 24]. Available from: https://sml.snl.no/f%C3%B8deinstitusjoner_i_Norge

Norwegian University of Science and Technology [Internet], Trondheim [cited 2026 July 24]. Available from: https://www.ntnu.no/videre/ultralydutdanning

Klungsøyr K, Nordtveit T I, Kaastad T S, Solberg S, Sletten I N, Vik A K. Epidemiology of limb reduction defects as registered in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, 1970–-2016: Population based study. PLoS One 2019; 14(7): e0219930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219930

Arduç A, van Dijk S J B, Ten Cate F J, van Doesburg M H M, Linskens I H, van Leeuwen E, et al. Phenotype-to-genotype description of prenatal suspected and postnatal discovered upper limb anomalies: a retrospective cohort study. Prenat Diagn 2025; 45(1): 3-14. doi: 10.1002/pd.6714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6714

Forman M, Canizares M F, Bohn D, James M A, Samora J, Steinman S, et al. Association of radial longitudinal deficiency and thumb hypoplasia: an update using the CoULD Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102(20): 1815-22. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.20.00281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.00281

Farr A, Wachutka E, Bettelheim D, Windsperger K, Farr S. Perinatal outcomes of infants with congenital limb malformations: an observational study from a tertiary referral center in Central Europe. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20(1): 35. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2720-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2720-x

Koskimies E, Lindfors N, Gissler M, Peltonen J, Nietosvaara Y. Congenital upper limb deficiencies and associated malformations in Finland: a population-based study. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36(6): 1058-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.03.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.03.015

Clelland A D, Lester R, Duncan Ó, Lam W L. Parental experience after diagnosis of a congenital upper limb difference: a national survey. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2024; 49(11): 1327-33. doi: 10.1177/17531934241249014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934241249014

Wilks D J, Cevik J, Kennedy J, Coombs C, Penington A, McCombe D. An analysis of the functional and psychosocial impact of congenital upper limb differences using PROMIS®: data from the Australian Hand Difference Register. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2026; 51(1): 79-86. doi: 10.1177/17531934251355084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251355084

Bae D S, Canizares M F, Miller P E, Waters P M, Goldfarb C A. Functional impact of congenital hand differences: early results from the Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) Registry. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43(4): 321-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.10.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.10.006

Published

2026-09-17

How to Cite

Sletten, I. N., Winge, M. I., & Jokihaara, J. (2026). Time of diagnosis of congenital upper limb anomalies: a cohort study of 703 patients from a local registry in Norway. Acta Orthopaedica, 97, 678–684. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46807

PlumX (by Elsevier) is an altmetrics platform that tracks and visualizes the online attention, usage, captures, citations, and social media engagement.