HARKing, transparency, and honesty in reporting: improving reporting of scientific articles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46651Keywords:
StatisticsDownloads
References
Kerr N L. HARKing: hypothesizing after the results are known. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 1998; 2(3): 3. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
Ranstam J. Hypothesis-generating and confirmatory studies, Bonferroni correction, and pre-specification of trial endpoints. Acta Orthop 2019; 90(4): 297. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1612624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1612624
Munafò M R, Nosek B A, Bishop D V M, Button K S, Chambers C D, du Sert N P, et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav 2017; 1: 0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021
Liukkonen R, Vaajala M, Kuitunen I, Mattila V M, Ponkilainen V, Uimonen M, et al. Improving research reproducibility in surgery: a narrative review on caveats in research methodology. Scand J Surg 2025; 114(4): 494-504. doi: 10.1177/14574969251371880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969251371880
Christensen R, Haugegaard T, Jakobsen J C. Role of prespecified analysis plans in physiological research: encouraged or mandatory? Exp Physiol 2025; 110(9): 1186-91. doi: 10.1113/EP092034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092034
Colquhoun D. An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values. R Soc Open Sci 2014; 1(3): 3. doi: 10.1098/rsos.140216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140216
Ioannidis J P A. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005; 2(8): 8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
Ioannidis J P A, Greenland S, Hlatky M A, Khoury M J, Macleod M R, Moher D, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet 2014; 383(9912): 9912. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8
Hollenbeck J R, Wright P M. Harking, Sharking, and Tharking: making the case for post hoc analysis of scientific data. J Manag 2017; 43(1): 5-18. doi: 10.1177/0149206316679487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679487
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aleksi Reito, Robin Christensen, Soren Overgaard

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PlumX (by Elsevier) is an altmetrics platform that tracks and visualizes the online attention, usage, captures, citations, and social media engagement.
