Non-union rates and complications after elective interphalangeal joint arthrodesis of the hand: a cohort study of 366 arthrodeses in 289 patients

Authors

  • Karl Lindberg Department of Hand Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8960-4582
  • Hanna Sand-Uhlén Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Martin Clementson Department of Hand Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
  • Magnus Tägil Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-5591
  • Deepak Bushan Raina Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Elisabeth Brogren Department of Hand Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46627

Keywords:

Arthrodesis, Bone, Hand, Osteoarthrosis

Abstract

Background and purpose: Interphalangeal joint arthrodesis of the hand is a common procedure, but data on outcomes and complications is limited. We aimed to determine the non-union rate, evaluate risk factors for non-union, and investigate the frequency and distribution of complications across different fixation methods.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all interphalangeal joint arthrodeses performed between 2014 and 2022. Union and non-union were defined clinically and/or radiographically. Potential risk factors for non-union were evaluated by logistic regression with cluster-robust standard errors accounting for clustering of multiple arthrodeses within patients.
Results: After exclusions, 366 arthrodeses in 289 patients with ≥ 2 years of follow-up were analyzed. The median age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR] 57–72) among women and 58 years (IQR 41–69) among men. Non-union occurred in 20 of 366 arthrodeses (5.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6–8.3). Men had higher odds of non-union than women, but the difference was not statistically significant (OR 2.43, CI 0.98–6.01); no other characteristic was associated with non-union. Hardware-related complications were frequent, particularly following fixation with K-wires and cerclage, and resulted in hardware removal in 47% of cases. Other complications included superficial infections in 7% of cases, deep infections in 4%, and malunion in 4%.
Conclusion: Elective interphalangeal joint arthrodesis was associated with a non-union rate of 5.5% (CI 3.6–8.3) and few major complications; however, hardware-related problems were frequent and commonly hardware removal was required.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Straszewski A, Wolf J. Osteoarthritis of the interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints of the hand. In: Plastic surgery. New York: DeckerMed; 2020. doi: 10.2310/PS.10083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2310/PS.10083

Silvano P, Pantzar-Castilla E, Lundqvist E. Arthrodesis of distal interphalangeal and thumb interphalangeal joint: a retrospective cohort study of 149 cases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25(1): 258. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07361-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07361-w

Heinonen A, Leppänen O, Huhtala H, Karjalainen T, Jokihaara J. Factors influencing bone union in finger distal interphalangeal and thumb interphalangeal joint arthrodesis. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol 2020; 25(02): 184-91. doi: 10.1142/S2424835520500216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835520500216

Beldner S, Polatsch D B. Arthrodesis of the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints of the hand: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016; 24(5): 290-7. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00033

Runkel A, Bonaventura B, Sundermann B, Zajonc H, Eisenhardt S, Leibig N. Risk factors in distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis in the hand: a retrospective study of 173 cases. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2022; 47(9): 907-14. doi: 10.1177/17531934221111641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934221111641

Faulkner H, An V, Lawson R D, Graham D J, Sivakumar B S. Proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis techniques: a systematic review. Hand (N Y) 2023; 18(1): 74-9. doi: 10.1177/1558944721998019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944721998019

Dickson D R, Mehta S S, Nuttall D, Ng C Y. A systematic review of distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis. J Hand Microsurg 2014; 6(2): 74-84. doi: 10.1007/s12593-014-0163-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12593-014-0163-1

Millrose M, Gesslein M, Ittermann T, Kim S, Vonderlind H C, Ruettermann M. Arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the finger: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 2022; 7(1): 49-58. doi: 10.1530/EOR-21-0102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-21-0102

Rigot S K, Diaz-Garcia R, Debski R E, Fowler J. Biomechanical analysis of internal fixation methods for distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis. Hand (N Y) 2016; 11(2): 221-6. doi: 10.1177/1558944715627211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944715627211

Vedel J-C, Jorgensen R W, Jensen C H. Arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal joint and the thumb interphalangeal joint: a retrospective comparison of Kirschner wires and the Acutrak 2 headless compression screw. Open Orthop J 2019; 13: 166-9. doi: 10.2174/1874325001913010166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001913010166

Woo S H, Kwak S H, Jang H S, Kim D H, Seo J H, Lee S H. Distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis with nonaxial multiple small screws: a biomechanical analysis with axial headless compression screw and clinical result of 15 consecutive cases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23(1): 504. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05473-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05473-9

Heineman N, Do D H, Ahn J, Sammer D M, Koehler D M. Biomechanical analysis of headless compression screw versus tension band wiring for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis. J Hand Surg Am 2025; 50(5): 625.e1-625.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.01.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.01.007

De Almeida Y K, Athlani L, Dap F, Dautel G. Distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis using the X-Fuse implant: a retrospective study of 54 fingers with 24 months’ follow-up. Hand Surg Rehabil 2019; 38(3): 186-90. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2019.01.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2019.01.001

Barabas P, Pavličný R. Arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal joint of the finger using an intramedullary implant. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2024; 91(5): 282-8. doi: 10.55095/achot2024/047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2024/047

Renault A, Maximen J, Ebalard M, Mevel G, Ropars M, Dreano T. Arthrodesis of distal interphalangeal joints using X-Fuse implant: a five-year retrospective study of 64 fingers. Acta Orthop Belg 2025; 91(1): 77-83. doi: 10.52628/91.1.13284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52628/91.1.13284

Satteson E S, Langford M A, Li Z. The management of complications of small joint arthrodesis and arthroplasty. Hand Clin 2015; 31(2): 243-66. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2015.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2015.01.002

Published

2026-09-14

How to Cite

Lindberg, K., Sand-Uhlén, H., Clementson, M., Tägil, M., Raina, D. B., & Brogren, E. (2026). Non-union rates and complications after elective interphalangeal joint arthrodesis of the hand: a cohort study of 366 arthrodeses in 289 patients. Acta Orthopaedica, 97, 659–664. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46627

Issue

Section

Publications

Categories

PlumX (by Elsevier) is an altmetrics platform that tracks and visualizes the online attention, usage, captures, citations, and social media engagement.