Patients’ choice of healthcare provider for primary hip and knee arthroplasty: a national register-based observational cohort study of 62,676 patients from Norway, 2014–2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46430Keywords:
Arthroplasty, Hip, KneeAbstract
Background and purpose: We aimed to quantify how provider-related factors are associated with patients’ revealed, GP-mediated choice of arthroplasty provider in Norway, expressed as willingness to travel (WTT) in minutes, and to explore how WTT for travel time was modified by patient characteristics.
Methods: This is a national observational cohort study including all publicly funded, elective primary hip and knee arthroplasties in Norway, 2014–2018 (n = 62,676), with linkage to national registries. A mixed logit model was used to analyze choice among providers with different attributes, in both preference and WTT space. Associations between individual-level travel-time preferences and patient characteristics were analyzed with multilevel modelling.
Results: Patients accepted substantial additional travel time for several provider attributes. Mean WTT was 156 min (95% confidence interval [CI] 130–182; median 8) for a dedicated elective surgical unit, 70 min (CI 67–72) for a provider within the patient’s regional health authority, 16 min (CI 15–17) for above-median surgical volume, 4 min (CI 3–5) for an adult child living near the provider, and 3 min (CI 3–3) for below-median waiting time. WTT for travel time was reduced in patients with high comorbidity (−27%), low education (−33%), and low income (−30%), with graded gradients across categories, and decreased with increasing age.
Conclusion: Provider attributes were associated with patients’ revealed, GP-mediated choice of arthroplasty provider, expressed as clinically interpretable WTT. WTT was lower among older, sicker, and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients, indicating that realized choice is patterned by both modifiable structural features of the healthcare system and patient-level socioeconomic gradients.
Downloads
References
Victoor A, Delnoij D M, Friele R D, Rademakers J J. Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12: 272. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-272.
Vrangbaek K, Robertson R, Winblad U, Van de Bovenkamp H, Dixon A. Choice policies in Northern European health systems. Health Econ Policy Law 2012; 7: 47-71. doi: 10.1017/s1744133111000302.
Aggarwal A, Lewis D, Mason M, Sullivan R, van der Meulen J. Patient mobility for elective secondary health care services in response to patient choice policies: a systematic review. Med Care Res Rev 2017; 74: 379-403. doi: 10.1177/1077558716654631.
Magnussen J, Vrangbaek K, Saltman R B. Nordic health care systems: recent reforms and current policy challenges. In: Policies TEOoHSa, ed. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill Education (UK); 2009. ISBN-10: 0335238130.
Brekke K R, Straume O R. Competition policy for health care provision in Norway. Health Policy 2017; 121: 134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.11.013.
Blix B H, Hovind V, Ingebrigtsen T. Factors affecting general practitioners’ referrals of patients to hip and knee arthroplasty: a focus group study from Northern Norway. BMC Health Serv 2025; 25: 727. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12774-x.
Siciliani L, Chalkley M, Gravelle H. Does provider competition improve health care quality and efficiency? Expectations and evidence from Europe. In: Policies EOoHSa, ed. Policy Brief 48. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
Monstad K, Engesaeter L B, Espehaug B. Waiting time and socioeconomic status: an individual-level analysis. Health Econ 2014; 23: 446-61. doi: 10.1002/hec.2924.
Lindén T S, Ervik R. Health services in Nordic welfare states: introducing a new category of providers through the Norwegian free treatment choice reform. Nordisk Alkohol Nark 2022; 35: 487-502. doi: 10.1177/14550725221108790.
Helse Førde, ed. Health atlas of orthopaedics in Norway; 2018. Available from: https://apps.skde.no › helseatlas › ortopedi
Furnes O, Gjertsen J E, Hallan G, Inderhaug E, Gundersen T, Fenstad A M, et al. Annual report 2024: Norwegian National Network for Arthroplasty and Hip Fractures; 2025. Available from: https://www.helse-bergen.no/48d1eb/contentassets/9f19d57711ee4e60815d6b89e8e8472b/report2024.pdf
Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin L I, Engesaeter L B, Vollset S E, Kindseth O. Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2006; 77: 49-56. doi: 10.1080/17453670610045696.
Nilssen Y, Strand T E, Wiik R, Bakken IJ , Yu X Q, O’Connell D L, et al. Utilizing national patient-register data to control for comorbidity in prognostic studies. Clin Epidemiol 2014; 6: 395-404. doi: 10.2147/clep.s70742.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. International Standard Classification of Education ISCED 2011. Montreal, Canada: UNESCO Institute for Statistics; 2012. Available from: www.uis.unesco.org/en/methods-and-tools/isced
Train K. Discrete choice methods with simulation. 2nd ed; 2009. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511805271.
Snijders T A B, Bosker R J. Multilevel analysis. an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. London: Sage; 2011. ISBN-10: 184920201X.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; 2022. Available at https://www.R-project.org
R Studio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. 2021. Available at Available from: http://www.rstudio.com
Hess S, Palma D. Apollo: a flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application. J Choice Modelling 2019; 32. doi: 10.1016/j.jocm.2019.100170.
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 2015: 48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Badawy M, Espehaug B, Indrekvam K, Engesæter L B, Havelin L I, Furnes O. Influence of hospital volume on revision rate after total knee arthroplasty with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95: e131. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.L.00943.
Beckert W, Kelly E. Divided by choice? For-profit providers, patient choice and mechanisms of patient sorting in the English National Health Service. Health Econ 2021; 30: 820-39. doi: 10.1002/hec.4223.
Simonsen N F, Oxholm A S, Kristensen S R, Siciliani L. What explains differences in waiting times for health care across socioeconomic status? Health Econ 2020; 29: 1764-85. doi: 10.1002/hec.4163.
Rademakers J, Nijman J, Brabers A E, de Jong J D, Hendriks M. The relative effect of health literacy and patient activation on provider choice in the Netherlands. Health Policy 2014; 114: 200-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.07.020.
Rognsvåg T, Nordmo I K, Bergvad I B, Fenstad A M, Furnes O, Lerdal A, et al. Digital health literacy in Norwegian patients with hip and knee arthroplasty: normative data from a cross-sectional study. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 677-84. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42304.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Beate Hauglann, Cato Kjærvik, Eva Stensland, Yohannes Tesfay, Anne Marie Fenstad, Ove Furnes, Tor Ingebrigtsen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PlumX (by Elsevier) is an altmetrics platform that tracks and visualizes the online attention, usage, captures, citations, and social media engagement.
