Tibial implant migration of cemented and cementless total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties in patients with low and normal bone mineral density: a 5-year RSA cohort study of 397 cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46362Keywords:
Bone mineral density, Implants, Knee, Osteoporosis, Radiological imaging, RadiostereometryAbstract
Background and purpose: Periprosthetic bone may influence the longevity of joint implants. We aimed to investigate the association between bone mineral density (BMD) and tibial implant migration of cemented and cementless knee arthroplasty as a surrogate marker of aseptic loosening.
Methods: In a prospective cohort study, patients were operated on between 2014 and 2018 with a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) or a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Preoperative BMD was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine and hips. Patients were categorized into low or normal T-score groups (threshold: T-score ≤ –1.0). Postoperative tibial implant migration was assessed using radiostereometry at baseline and 1-, 2-, and 5-year follow-ups. The primary outcome was 1-year maximum total point motion (MTPM) differences between T-score groups. Secondary outcomes evaluated the association between continuous migration (MTPM > 0.2 mm between 1 and 2 years) and T-score.
Results: 397 patients were included, where 210 patients received a cementless implant (TKA = 78, UKA = 132) and 187 received a cemented implant (TKA = 83, UKA =104). Estimated 1-year mean MTPM differences between the low and normal T-score groups were 0.15 mm (CI −0.25 to 0.55) for cementless TKA, 0.12 mm (CI −0.25 to 0.49) for cemented TKA, −0.21 mm (CI −0.51 to 0.10) for cementless UKA, and −0.15 mm (CI −0.34 to 0.04) for cemented UKA. A 1-unit increase in T-score showed comparable odds of continuous migration within both cemented (OR 0.94, CI 0.68–1.30) and cementless (OR 0.79, CI 0.56–1.12) tibial implants.
Conclusion: Tibial implant migration was not significantly different between patients with low and normal BMD as defined by T-score groups. These findings should be interpreted cautiously due to small group sizes and wide confidence intervals, highlighting the need for further studies to clarify the role of BMD in implant migration.
Downloads
References
Delsmann M M, Schmidt C, Muhlenfeld M, Jandl N M, Boese C K, Beil F T, et al. Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in elderly patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142: 3957-64. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04297-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04297-x
Bernatz J T, Brooks A E, Squire M W, Illgen R I 2nd, Binkley N C, Anderson P A. Osteoporosis is common and undertreated prior to total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34: 1347-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.044
Anderson K D, Ko F C, Virdi A S, Sumner D R, Ross R D. Biomechanics of implant fixation in osteoporotic bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2020; 18: 577-86. doi: 10.1007/s11914-020-00614-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-020-00614-2
Harris A B, Lantieri M A, Agarwal A R, Golladay G J, Thakkar S C. Osteoporosis and total knee arthroplasty: higher 5-year implant-related complications. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39: 948-53 e941. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.045
Chee A, Celiker P, Basedow K, Islam M, Baksh N, Shah N V, et al. A call to “own the bone”: osteoporosis is a predictor for adverse two-year outcomes following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2023; 33: 2889-94. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03499-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03499-w
Meyer M, Leiss F, Gotz J S, Holzapfel D E, Grifka J, Weber M. Bone mineral density is associated with adverse events but not patient-reported outcomes in total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39: 320-325. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.056
Pijls B G, Plevier J W M, Nelissen R. RSA migration of total knee replacements. Acta Orthop 2018; 89: 320-8. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1443635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1443635
Ryd L, Albrektsson B, Carlsson L, Dansgård F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, et al. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77-B: 377-83. doi: PMID: 7744919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.77B3.7744919
Andersen M R, Winther N S, Lind T, Schroder H M, Flivik G, Petersen M M. Low preoperative BMD is related to high migration of tibia components in uncemented TKA: 92 patients in a combined DEXA and RSA study with 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 2141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.032
Li M G, Nilsson K G. The effect of the preoperative bone quality on the fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 744-53. doi: 10.1054/arth.2000.6617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2000.6617
Koppens D, Rytter S, Dalsgaard J, Sorensen O G, Hansen T B, Stilling M. The effect of bone quality on tibial component migration in medial cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study using dual X-ray Aabsorptiometry and radiostereometric analysis. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35: 675-82 e672. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.027
Linde K N, Madsen F, Puhakka K B, Langdahl B L, Soballe K, Krog-Mikkelsen I, et al. Preoperative systemic bone quality does not affect tibial component migration in knee arthroplasty: a 2-year radiostereometric analysis of a hundred consecutive patients. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34: 2351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.019
Bendtsen M A F, Odgaard A, Madsen F, Mosegaard S B, Thomsen J S, Hauge E M, et al. Preoperative proximal tibial bone density, bone microarchitecture, and bone turnover are not associated with postoperative tibial component migration in cemented and cementless medial unicompartmental knee replacements: secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 121-9. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.39917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.39917
Petersen M M, Nielsen P T, Lebech A, Toksvig-Larsen S, Lund B. Preoperative bone mineral density of the proximal tibia and migration of the tibial component after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 77-81. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90206-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90206-1
Linde K N, Puhakka K B, Langdahl B L, Soballe K, Krog-Mikkelsen I, Madsen F, et al. Bone mineral density is lower in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis and attrition. Calcif Tissue Int 2017; 101: 593-601. doi: 10.1007/s00223-017-0315-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-017-0315-y
Kaptein B L, Pijls B, Koster L, Kärrholm J, Hull M, Niesen A, et al. Guideline for RSA and CT-RSA implant migration measurements: an update of standardizations and recommendations. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 256-67. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40709
Nakama G Y, Peccin M S, Almeida G J, Lira Neto Ode A, Queiroz A A, Navarro R D. Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10: CD006193. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006193.pub2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006193.pub2
Harris P A, Taylor R, Minor B L, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
Mohammad H R, Kennedy J A, Mellon S J, Judge A, Dodd C A, Murray D W. The clinical outcomes of cementless unicompartmental knee replacement in patients with reduced bone mineral density. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15: 35. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-1566-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-1566-2
Mohammad H R, Judge A, Murray D W. The effect of age on the relative outcomes of cemented and cementless mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, based on data from national databases. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38: 30-6 e31. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.004
Yoon C, Chang M J, Chang C B, Chai J W, Jeong H, Song M K, et al. Bone mineral density around the knee joint: correlation with central bone mineral density and associated factors. J Clin Densitom 2020; 23: 82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.07.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2018.07.005
Hasan S, Kaptein B L, Nelissen R G H H, Hamersveld K T, Toksvig-Larsen S, Marang-van de Mheen P J. The influence of postoperative coronal alignment on tibial migration after total knee arthroplasty in preoperative varus and valgus knees. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103: 2281-90. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.016592282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.01659
Hamersveld K T, Mheen P J M, Nelissen R G H H. The effect of coronal alignment on tibial component migration following total knee arthroplasty: a cohort study with long-term radiostereometric analysis results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101: 1203-12. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.006911204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.00691
Ro D H, Jin H, Park J Y, Lee M C, Won S, Han H S. The use of bisphosphonates after joint arthroplasty is associated with lower implant revision rate. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27: 2082-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5333-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5333-4
Teng S, Yi C, Krettek C, Jagodzinski M. Bisphosphonate use and risk of implant revision after total hip/knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0139927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139927
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Karina N Linde, Bente L Langdahl, Søren Rytter, Rob G H H Nelissen, Maiken Stilling
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PlumX (by Elsevier) is an altmetrics platform that tracks and visualizes the online attention, usage, captures, citations, and social media engagement.
