Precision of an automated surface-based CT-RSA (asCTRSA) for assessing tibial implant migration: a porcine cadaver study and a clinical case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46156Keywords:
Arthroplasty, CT-RSA, image processing, image registration, Implant migration, Implants, KneeAbstract
Background and purpose: Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the reference standard for migration analysis, but adoption is limited by invasive marker implantation and specialized equipment. We developed an automated, surface-based CT-RSA (asCTRSA) method that reports a registration quality measure (mean rigid-body fitting error, ME). Our aim was to evaluate the precision by comparing asCTRSA with marker-based RSA and CT-based Micromotion Analysis (CTMA, v25.1).
Methods: Precision was assessed in a retrospective, repeated-measures, zero-migration study using a porcine cadaver tibial implant scanned in 7 positions (21 double examinations). Migration was reported as maximum total point motion (MTPM) for RSA and asCTRSA. CTMA provided maximum total translation (mTT) as an estimate of MTPM. Mean rigid-body fitting error (ME) was calculated for RSA and asCTRSA (acceptability threshold 0.35 mm). The minimal important difference for MTPM/mTT was 0.1 mm. asCTRSA was applied to 1 clinical case with known migration 3 and 8 months postoperatively (NCT04017533).
Results: In the porcine study, precision was 0.09 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02–0.18) for asCTRSA, 0.08 mm (CI 0.03–0.12) for CTMA, and 0.45 mm (CI 0.20–0.69) for RSA. In the clinical case, asCTRSA detected increasing migration (MTPM 2.5–3.6 mm) and exceeded CTMA’s mTT by 0.4 mm at 8 months. Mean rigid-body fitting error remained below 0.35 mm.
Conclusion: We showed that asCTRSA enables automated, surface-based CT-RSA and demonstrated higher precision than RSA in this zero-migration cadaver setting.
Downloads
References
Pijls B G, Plevier J W M, Nelissen R G H. RSA migration of total knee replacements: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 2018; 89(3): 320-8. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1443635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1443635
Kaptein B L, Pijls B, Koster L, Kärrholm J, Hull M, Niesen A, et al. Guideline for RSA and CT-RSA implant migration measurements: an update of standardizations and recommendations. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 256-67. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40709
Snorrason F, Kärrholm J. Primary migration of fully-threaded acetabular prostheses: a roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72-B(4): 647-52. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B4.2199453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.72B4.2199453
Valstar E, Kaptein B, Nelissen R. Radiostereometry and new prostheses. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(2): 103-4. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.678796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.678796
Aronson A S, Hoist L, Selvik G. An instrument for insertion of radiopaque bone markers. Radiology 1974; 113(3): 733-4. doi: 10.1148/113.3.733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/113.3.733
Kärrholm J, Gill R H S, Valstar E R. The history and future of radiostereometric analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 448: 10. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000224001.95141.fe. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000224001.95141.fe
Engseth L H W, Øhrn F-D, Schulz A, Röhrl S M M. CT-based migration analysis of a tibial component compared to radiostereometric analysis: one-year results of a prospective single-group implant safety study. Bone Joint J 2025; 107-B(2): 173-80. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0356.R2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0356.R2
Hext R A, Kaptein B L, Howard J L, Lanting B A, Teeter M G. Inducible displacement of cementless total knee arthroplasty components with conventional and weight-bearing CT-based radiostereometric analysis. J Orthop Res 2025; 43(3): 640-9. doi: 10.1002/jor.26017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26017
Brodén C, Sandberg O H, Olivecrona H, Emery R, Sköldenberg O. Precision of CT-based micromotion analysis is comparable to radiostereometry for early migration measurements in cemented acetabular cups. Acta Orthop 2021; 92(4): 419-23. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1906082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1906082
Sandberg O H, Kärrholm J, Olivecrona H, Röhrl S M H, Sköldenberg O G, Brodén C. Computed tomography-based radiostereometric analysis in orthopedic research: practical guidelines. Acta Orthop 2023; 94:373-8. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.15337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.15337
De Bondt M R, Øhrn F-D, Engseth L H W, Schulz A, Kaptein B L, Röhrl S M, et al. Precision evaluation of 2 CT-based radiostereometric analysis systems in a cadaver study. Acta Orthop 2025; 96:867-72. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.44949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44949
Christensson A, Nemati H M, Flivik G. Comparison between model-based RSA and an AI-based CT-RSA: an accuracy study of 30 patients. Acta Orthop 2024; 95:39-46. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.35749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.35749
Øhrn F-D, Engseth L H W, Pripp A H, Schulz A, Röhrl S M H. Dose reduction does not impact the precision of CT-based RSA in tibial implants: a diagnostic accuracy study on precision in a porcine cadaver. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 550-4. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.24022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.24022
Øhrn F-D, Engseth L H W, Pripp A H, Schulz A, Röhrl S M H. Precision of computer tomography based RSA on femoral implants in total knee arthroplasty: a porcine cadaver study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2025; 123: 106456. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106456
Bossuyt P M, Reitsma J B, Bruns D E, Gatsonis C, Glasziou P, Irwig L, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 2015; 351:h5527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5527
Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1979; 9(1): 62-6. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076
Besl P J, McKay N D. Method for registration of 3-D shapes. Proc SPIE 1992; 1611: 586-606. doi: 10.1117/12.57955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.57955
Keelson B, Buzzatti L, Ceranka J, Gutiérrez A, Battista S, Scheerlinck T, et al. Automated motion analysis of bony joint structures from dynamic computer tomography images: a multi-atlas approach. Diagnostics 2021; 11(11): 2062. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11112062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112062
Engseth L H W, Schulz A, Pripp A H, Röhrl S M H, Øhrn F-D. CT-based migration analysis is more precise than radiostereometric analysis for tibial implants: a phantom study on a porcine cadaver. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 207-14. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.12306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.12306
Ryd L, Albrektsson B E, Carlsson L, Dansgard F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, et al. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77-B(3): 377-83. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.77B3.7744919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.77B3.7744919
Implants for surgery—Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis for the assessment of migration of orthopaedic implants. ISO 16087:2013 2013.
Angelomenos V, Shareghi B, Itayem R, Mohaddes M. Comparison of the CT-based micromotion analysis method versus marker-based RSA in measuring femoral head translation and evaluation of its intra- and interobserver reliability: a prospective agreement diagnostic study on 27 patients up to 1 year. Acta Orthop 2025; 96: 38-44. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42705
Mitra N J, Guibas L J, Pauly M. Partial and approximate symmetry detection for 3D geometry. ACM Trans Graph 2006; 25(3): 560-8. doi: 10.1145/1141911.1141924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1141911.1141924
Zhong Y. Intrinsic shape signatures: a shape descriptor for 3D object recognition. In: 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops) 2009. p. 689-96. doi: 10.1109/ICCVW.2009.5457637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVW.2009.5457637
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Manou Acke, Benyameen Keelson, Lars H W Engseth, Frank-David Øhrn, Gert van Gompel, Stephan M Röhrl, Anselm Schulz, Johan de Mey, Nico Buls
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PlumX (by Elsevier) is an altmetrics platform that tracks and visualizes the online attention, usage, captures, citations, and social media engagement.
