Validation of periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty: a cohort study on 423 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46073Keywords:
Arthroplasty, Aseptic loosening, Deep infection, Implants, Infection, KneeAbstract
Background and purpose: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Accurate reporting is essential for quality development and research based on data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR). Our study aimed to validate Norwegian orthopedic surgeons’ reporting of reoperations for PJI.
Methods: We assessed detailed clinical, biochemical, and microbiological data on 423 patients reported to the NAR for reoperations after primary TKA performed in Western Norway in the period from 2010 to 2023. We used the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) definition of PJI. For each cause of reoperation (including causes that could mimic PJI, such as aseptic loosening, prolonged wound drainage, and pain alone), we determined the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and accuracy.
Results: Of 423 reoperations, 170 were reported reoperations due to PJI. After validation, 94% (159 of 170) were confirmed to be due to PJI. Furthermore, 5% (13 of 253) of cases reported as reoperated due to causes other than deep infection were validated as PJI. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for PJI reporting were 92%, 96%, and 94%, respectively. Accuracy for aseptic loosening, prolonged wound drainage, and pain alone was 97%, 94%, and 98%, respectively.
Conclusion: The accuracy of reporting of reoperations due to PJI is high, thereby affirming the quality of reoperation data concerning PJI submitted to the NAR. Our findings support the use of NAR data in quality development and research.
Downloads
References
Lum Z C, Natsuhara K M, Shelton T J, Giordani M, Pereira G C, Meehan J P. Mortality during total knee periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33(12): 3783-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.021
Vasso M, Schiavone Panni A. Low-grade periprosthetic knee infection: diagnosis and management. J Orthop Traumatol 2015; 16(1): 1-7. doi: 10.1007/s10195-014-0294-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0294-y
Maradit Kremers H, Larson D R, Crowson C S, Kremers W K, Washington R E, Steiner C A, et al. Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97(17): 1386. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.01141
Furnes O, Gjertsen J E, Hallan G, Inderhaug E, Gundersen T, Fenstad A M, et al. Report 2024. Bergen: Norwegian National Network for Arthroplasty and Hip Fractures; 2024. Available from: https://www.helse-bergen.no/48d1eb/contentassets/9f19d57711ee4e60815d6b89e8e8472b/report2024.pdf
Gundtoft P H, Varnum C, Pedersen A B, Overgaard S. The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Clin Epidemiol 2016; 8: 509-14. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S99498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S99498
Robertsson O, Ranstam J, Sundberg M, W-Dahl A, Lidgren L. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: a review. Bone Joint Res 2014; 3(7): 217. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.37.2000289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.37.2000289
Zhu M, Ravi S, Frampton C, Luey C, Young S. New Zealand Joint Registry data underestimates the rate of prosthetic joint infection. Acta Orthop 2016; 87(4): 346-50. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1171639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2016.1171639
Jämsen E, Huotari K, Huhtala H, Nevalainen J, Konttinen Y T. Low rate of infected knee replacements in a nationwide series: is it an underestimate? Acta Orthop 2009; 80(2): 205-12. doi: 10.3109/17453670902947432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453670902947432
Witso E. The rate of prosthetic joint infection is underestimated in the arthroplasty registers. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(3): 277-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1042320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1042320
Bossuyt P M, Reitsma J B, Bruns D E, Gatsonis C A, Glasziou P P, Irwig L, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 2015; 351: h5527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5527
SSB [Internet]. [cited 2025 Nov 6]. Population. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/en/statbank/list/folkemengde
Workgroup Convened by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26(8): 1136-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.09.026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.09.026
Helsedirektoratet [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jul 28]. Proteseinfeksjon, protesebevarende eller en-seanse kirurgi. Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/retningslinjer/antibiotika-i-sykehus/ben-og-leddinfeksjoner/proteseinfeksjon-protesebevarende-eller-en-seanse-kirurgi
Lutro O, Mo S, Tjørhom M B, Fenstad A M, Leta T H, Bruun T, et al. How good are surgeons at disclosing periprosthetic joint infection at the time of revision, based on pre- and intra-operative assessment? A study on 16,922 primary total hip arthroplasties reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 67-72. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.39914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.39914
Gundtoft P H, Pedersen A B, Schønheyder H C, Overgaard S. Validation of the diagnosis ‘prosthetic joint infection’ in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B(3): 320-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B3.36705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B3.36705
Anneberg M, Kristiansen E B, Troelsen A, Gundtoft P, Sørensen H T, Pedersen A B. Enhancing the data capture of periprosthetic joint infections in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry: validity assessment and incidence estimation. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 166-73. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40358
Thompson O, W-Dahl A, Lindgren V, Gordon M, Robertsson O, Stefánsdóttir A. Similar periprosthetic joint infection rates after and before a national infection control program: a study of 45,438 primary total knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 2022; 93: 3-10. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1977532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1977532
Kempthorne J T, Ailabouni R, Raniga S, Hammer D, Hooper G. Occult infection in aseptic joint loosening and the diagnostic role of implant sonication. BioMed Res Int 2015; 2015: 946215. doi: 10.1155/2015/946215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/946215
Hodges N A, Sussman E M, Stegemann J P. Aseptic and septic prosthetic joint loosening: impact of biomaterial wear on immune cell function, inflammation, and infection. Biomaterials 2021; 278: 121127. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121127
Virolainen P, Lähteenmäki H, Hiltunen A, Sipola E, Meurman O, Nelimarkka O. The reliability of diagnosis of infection during revision arthroplasties. Scand J Surg 2002; 91(2): 178-81. doi: 10.1177/145749690209100208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/145749690209100208
Claassen L, Radtke K, Ettinger M, Plaass C, von Lewinski G. Preoperative diagnostic for periprosthetic joint infection prior to total knee revision arthroplasty. Orthop Rev 2014; 6(3): 5437. doi: 10.4081/or.2014.5437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2014.5437
Barnsley L, Barnsley L. Detection of aseptic loosening in total knee replacements: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol 2019; 48(10): 1565-72. doi: 10.1007/s00256-019-03215-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03215-y
Peel T N, Dowsey M M, Daffy J R, Stanley P A, Choong P F M, Buising K L. Risk factors for prosthetic hip and knee infections according to arthroplasty site. J Hosp Infect 2011; 79(2): 129-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2011.06.001
Saleh K, Olson M, Resig S, Bershadsky B, Kuskowski M, Gioe T, et al. Predictors of wound infection in hip and knee joint replacement: results from a 20 year surveillance program. J Orthop Res 2002; 20(3): 506-15. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00153-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00153-X
Parvizi J, Tan T L, Goswami K, Higuera C, Della Valle C, Chen A F, et al. The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33(5): 1309-14.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Martin Mossige, Olav Lutro, Anne Marie Fenstad, Tesfaye Hordofa Leta, Trond Bruun, Ove Furnes, Håvard Dale
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
PlumX (by Elsevier) is an altmetrics platform that tracks and visualizes the online attention, usage, captures, citations, and social media engagement.
