No difference in patient-reported outcome measures between private and public hospitals in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional analysis based on 170,150 hip and knee arthroplasties from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.45891Keywords:
Arthroplasty, Hip, KneeAbstract
Background and purpose: Private hospitals have become more frequent healthcare providers for arthroplasty surgery in the Netherlands. The aim of our study was to assess patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients who received primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in private hospitals compared with patients from public hospitals, and to assess access to care based on mean travel distance to the healthcare facility.
Methods: Patients operated on between 2014 and 2023 were included. Patient characteristics, preoperative, 3- or 6-, and 12 months postoperative PROMs (Numeric Pain Rating Scale [NRS] pain, EuroQoL 5-Dimensions [EQ-5D-5L], Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [HOOS-PS], Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS-PS], Oxford Hip Score [OHS], and Oxford Knee Score [OKS]) were retrieved from the LROI. For analysis, repeated measurements were performed, using mixed-effect models adjusted for confounders. Primary endpoints for inference were NRS pain during activity, HOOS/KOOS-PS, and OHS/OKS at 3 months follow-up. Mean travel distance to the hospital was compared, as measure for access to care.
Results: 146,303 primary THAs, TKAs, and UKAs performed in public hospitals and 23,847 in private hospitals were included. Patients undergoing arthroplasty in private hospitals were generally younger and had a higher socioeconomic status and lower body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status class. Both patients from private and public hospitals improved similarly and significantly after surgery. At 3-month follow-up, public hospitals showed marginal but statistically significant advantages in HOOS/KOOS-PS for THA, TKA, and UKA (mean differences 0.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1–0.9], 0.5 [CI 0.1–0.9], and 1.3 [CI 0.5–2.1], respectively). OKS favored public hospitals for TKA and UKA (–0.4 [CI –0.6 to –0.2] and –0.6 [CI –1.0 to –0.1]). NRS pain during activity favored private hospitals for TKA (–0.2 [CI –0.3 to –0.1]). All absolute differences were small and without statistical significance. Mean travel distance was significantly shorter for patients treated in public hospitals.
Conclusion: There is no difference in PROMs between public and private hospitals after primary THA, TKA and UKA in the Netherlands. Based on mean travel distance, access to care was not compromised for high-risk patients.
Downloads
References
Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). Annual report. LROI report, 2023. Numbers – LROI Report – Information on orthopaedic prosthesis procedures in the Netherlands (lroireport.nl). Retrieved: July 2023.https://www.lroi.nl/media/bjge0yfe/pdf-lroi-annual-report-2023-1-gecomprimeerd.pdf
Latijnhouwers D, Pedersen A, Kristiansen E, Cannegieter S, Schreurs B W, van den Hout W, et al. No time to waste: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty surgeries in the Netherlands and Denmark. Bone Jt Open 2022; 3(12): 977-90. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.312.BJO-2022-0111.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.312.BJO-2022-0111.R1
Van Dooren B J, Bos P, Peters R M, Van Steenbergen L N, De Visser E, Brinkman J M, et al. Time trends in case-mix and risk of revision following hip and knee arthroplasty in public and private hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis based on 476,312 procedures from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 307-18. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40906
Siljander M P, McQuivey K S, Fahs A M, Galasso L A, Serdahely K J, Karadsheh M S. Current trends in patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty: a study of 4 major orthopaedic journals. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33(11): 3416-21. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.034
van Steenbergen L N, Denissen G A, Spooren A, van Rooden S M, van Oosterhout F J, Morrenhof J W, et al. More than 95% completeness of reported procedures in the population-based Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(4): 498-505. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1028307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1028307
von Elm E, Altman D G, Egger M, Pocock S J, Gøtzsche P C, Vandenbroucke J P; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61(4): 344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
Dutch Institute of Social Research (SCP). Socioenomic status score per postal code area. Retrieved November 2023. Available by request from: https://bronnen.zorggegevens.nl/Bron?naam=Sociaal-Economische-Status-per-postcodegebied
EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16(3): 199-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
Nilsdotter A K, Lohmander L S, Klässbo M, Roos E M. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS): validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-4-10
Davis A M, Perruccio A V, Canizares M, Tennant A, Hawker G A, Conaghan P G, et al. The development of a short measure of physical function for hip OA HOOS-Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS): an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16(5): 551-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.016
Murray D W, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard D J, Carr A J, et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89(8): 1010-14. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424
Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80(1): 63-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.0800063
Peters R M, van Beers L W A H, van Steenbergen L N, Wolkenfelt J, Ettema H B, Ten Have B L E F, et al. Similar superior patient-reported outcome measures for anterior and posterolateral approaches after total hip arthroplasty: postoperative patient-reported outcome measure improvement after 3 months in 12,774 primary total hip arthroplasties using the anterior, anterolateral, straight lateral, or posterolateral approach. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33(6): 1786-93. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.055
Van Dooren B, Peters R M, van Steenbergen L N, Post R A J, Ettema H B, Bolder S B T, et al. No clinically relevant difference in patient-reported outcomes between the direct superior approach and the posterolateral or anterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 37,976 primary hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 543-9. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.23729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.23729
Sabah S A, Alvand A, Beard D J, Price A J. Minimal important changes and differences were estimated for Oxford hip and knee scores following primary and revision arthroplasty. J Clin Epidemiol 2022; 143: 159-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.016
Tubach F, Ravaud P, Baron G, Falissard B, Logeart I, Bellamy N, et al. Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64(1): 29–33. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.022905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2004.022905
Dekhne M S, Fontana M A, Pandey S, Driscoll D A, Lyman S, McLawhorn A S, et al. Defining patient-relevant thresholds and change scores for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR anchored on the Patient-acceptable Symptom State question. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2024; 482(4): 688-98. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002857
Paulsen A, Roos E M, Pedersen A B, Overgaard S. Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients 1 year postoperatively. Acta Orthop 2014; 85(1): 39-48. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.867782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.867782
Adie S, Dao A, Harris I A, Naylor J M, Mittal R. Satisfaction with joint replacement in public versus private hospitals: a cohort study. ANZ J Surg 2012; 82(9): 616-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06113.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06113.x
Naylor J M, Descallar J, Grootemaat M, Badge H, Harris I A, Simpson G, et al. Is satisfaction with the acute-care experience higher amongst consumers treated in the private sector? A survey of public and private sector arthroplasty recipients. PLoS One 2016; 11(8): e0159799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159799
Christensen R, Ranstam J, Overgaard S, Wagner P. Guidelines for a structured manuscript: statistical methods and reporting in biomedical research journals. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 243-9. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.11656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.11656
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marije Carlijn Vink, Pelle Bos, Bart-Jan van Dooren, Rinne M Peters, Liza N van Steenbergen, Enrico de Visser, J Martijn Brinkman, B Willem Schreurs, Wierd P Zijlstra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
