Effect of an in-consult patient decision aid on decisional quality and involvement for patients with severe hip or knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter, cluster randomized controlled trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.45697Keywords:
Arthroplasty, Cluster randomised controlled trial, Decision quality, Hip, KneeAbstract
Background and purpose: Shared decision-making (SDM) is important in managing patients with severe hip and knee osteoarthritis, where treatment decisions often depend on patient preferences and values. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an in-consult patient decision aid in improving decision quality and patient involvement compared with usual care.
Methods: In a cluster-randomized controlled trial, surgeons from 2 Danish orthopedic departments were randomized to use in-consult patient decision aids or provide usual care. The primary outcome was decision quality assessed using the Hip/Knee OA Decision Quality Instrument (HK-DQI). Patients who were well informed and received their preferred treatment received an Informed Patient-Centered (IPC) score of 1, indicating good decisional quality; all others scored 0. Secondary outcomes included patient-experienced engagement and involvement in decision-making, assessed using CollaboRATE and the decision-process domain of the Hip/Knee OA Decision Quality Instrument and consultation duration. Relative risks (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multilevel regression models.
Results: 20 surgeons were randomized to either use in-consult patient decision aids (n = 10) or provide usual care (n = 10). Of the 1,038 patients screened for severe hip or knee osteoarthritis, 581 were included in the study. Decision quality was similar between groups, with a score of 43 (36–51) in the intervention group and 44 (37–52) in the usual care group (RR 0.9, CI 0.7–1.2; P = 0.8), likewise, patient-experienced engagement assessed with CollaboRATE (RR 1.1, CI 0.8–1.4; P = 0.6). Consultations were longer in the intervention group, with a mean difference of 3.9 minutes (CI 0.1–7.7; P = 0.04).
Conclusion: Decision quality and patient-reported engagement were similar between groups, while consultation time was longer with in-consult patient decision aids use. In the absence of prespecified minimal important differences, the clinical relevance of these findings remains uncertain.
Downloads
References
Okafor L, Chen AF. Patient satisfaction and total hip arthroplasty: a review. Arthroplasty 2019; 1: 6. doi: 10.1186/s42836-019-0007-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-019-0007-3
Laigaard J, Aljuboori S M, Nikolajsen L, Mathiesen O, Lunn T H, Lindberg-Larsen M, et al. Chronic pain after primary total and medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a Danish nationwide cross-sectional survey. Acta Orthop 2025; 96: 814-21. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.44898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44898
Elwyn G, Cochran N, Pignone M. Shared decision making—the importance of diagnosing preferences. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177: 1239-40. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1923 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1923
Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry M J, Bennett C L, Eden K B, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 4: CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5
Sepucha K R, Vo H, Chang Y, Dorrwachter J M, Dwyer M, Freiberg A A, et al. Shared decision-making is associated with better outcomes in patients with knee but not hip osteoarthritis: the DECIDE-OA randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104: 62-9. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.21.00064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.00064
Campbell M K, Piaggio G, Elbourne D R, Altman D G. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ 2012; 345: e5661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5661
Sepucha K R, Abhyankar P, Hoffman A S, Bekker H L, LeBlanc A, Levin C A, et al. Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient decision aid evaluation studies: the development of SUNDAE Checklist. BMJ Qual Saf 2018; 27(5): 380. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006986
Pedersen T A, Lindberg-Larsen M, Jensen C M, Timm S, Steffensen K D, Varnum C. Impact of an in-consult patient decision aid on decisional quality, involvement, and health outcome for patients with severe hip or knee osteoarthritis: a study protocol for a multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial (PATI-study). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2025; 26: 584. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08856-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08856-w
Stacey D, Legare F, Lyddiatt A, Giguere A M, Yoganathan M, Saarimaki A, et al. Translating evidence to facilitate shared decision making: development and usability of a consult decision aid prototype. Patient 2016; 9: 571-82. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0177-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-016-0177-9
Bennett C, Graham I D, Kristjansson E, Kearing S A, Clay K F, O’Connor A M. Validation of a preparation for decision making scale. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 78: 130-3. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.05.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.05.012
Elwyn G, Durand M A, Song J, Aarts J, Barr P J, Berger Z, et al. A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ 2017; 359: j4891. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4891
Sepucha K. Hip and knee osteoarthritis: informed, patient-centered decision measure. Users guide; 2019. Available from: https://mghdecisionsciences.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2019-hip-and-knee-ipc-user-guide.pdf.
Sepucha K, Stacey D, Clay C, Chang Y, Cosenza C, Dervin G, et al. Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: A psychometric evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 149. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-149
Elwyn G. CollaboRATE measure; 2013. Available from: http://www.glynelwyn.com/collaborate-measure.html. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t28232-000
Barr P J, Thompson R, Walsh T, Grande S W, Ozanne E M, Elwyn G. The psychometric properties of CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of the shared decision-making process. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3085
Bilbao A, García-Pérez L, Arenaza J C, García I, Ariza-Cardiel G, Trujillo-Martín E, et al. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: reliability, validity and responsiveness. Qual Life Res 2018; 27: 2897-908. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1929-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1929-x
Brodney S, Fowler F J Jr, Barry M J, Chang Y, Sepucha K. Comparison of three measures of shared decision making: SDM Process_4, CollaboRATE, and SURE scales. Med Decis Mak 2019; 39: 673-80. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19855951 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X19855951
McBee M. Modeling outcomes with floor or ceiling effects: an introduction to the Tobit Model. Gifted Child Q 2010; 54: 314-20. doi: 10.1177/0016986210379095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210379095
Stacey D, Hawker G, Dervin G, Tugwell P, Boland L, Pomey M-P, et al. Decision aid for patients considering total knee arthroplasty with preference report for surgeons: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15: 54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-54
Sepucha K, Atlas S J, Chang Y, Dorrwachter J, Freiberg A, Mangla M, et al. Patient decision aids improve decision quality and patient experience and reduce surgical rates in routine orthopaedic care: a prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg 2017; 99: 1253-60. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.16.01045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01045
Pacheco-Brousseau L, Charette M, Poitras S, Stacey D. Effectiveness of patient decision aids for total hip and knee arthroplasty decision-making: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2021; 29: 1399-411. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.07.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2021.07.006
Olling K, Bechmann T, Madsen P H, Jakobsen E H, Toftdahl D B, Hilberg O, et al. Development of a patient decision aid template for use in different clinical settings. Eur J Pers Cent Healthc 2019; 7.
Moseng T, Vliet Vlieland T P M, Battista S, Beckwée D, Boyadzhieva V, Conaghan P G, et al. EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: 2023 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2024; 730-40. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-225041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2023-225041
Baccolini V, Rosso A, Di Paolo C, Isonne C, Salerno C, Migliara G, et al. What is the prevalence of low health literacy in European Union member states? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36: 753-61. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06407-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06407-8
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Trine Ahlmann Pedersen, Martin Lindberg-Larsen, Charlotte Myhre Jensen, Karina Dahl Steffensen, Claus Varnum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
