Inducible displacement CT for implant loosening detection: a scoping review on methods, validation, and challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.45512Keywords:
Arthroplasty, Diagnostic, Hip, Implants, Inducible displacement CT, KneeAbstract
Background and purpose: Inducible displacement CT (ID-CT) is an emerging method for diagnosing implant loosening by (i) acquiring CT scans under different joint loading conditions, (ii) analyzing scans via segmentation and registration, and (iii) quantifying and visualizing relative implant–bone displacement. With multiple centers approaching these steps differently, this scoping review aimed to summarize current methodologies and key challenges.
Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for clinical and experimental ID-CT studies on spinal and arthroplasty implants. Data was extracted using a table based on updated CT-radiostereometric analysis (RSA) guidelines, including study characteristics, CT acquisition parameters, image analysis methods, validation approaches, outcomes, and loading protocols. Diagnostic studies were assessed with QUADAS-2.
Results: 22 studies were included concerning the hip (10), knee (7), spine (4), and wrist (1), covering clinical and experimental (phantom and cadaveric) designs. Loading protocols varied widely, applying compressive, rotational, and angular forces with external stabilization or loading devices. CT acquisition ranged from µCT to conventional and weight-bearing CT, with variation in kVp, mAs, reconstruction spacing, and metal artefact reduction. Image-analysis workflows were broadly similar, though reporting of algorithms and displacement metrics was often incomplete. Diagnostic validation was limited by variable reference standards, non-prespecified loosening thresholds, and non-blinded assessments, undermining true performance. Technical validation, although often precise, did not cover the full ID-CT pipeline (i.e., complete loading protocol), leaving key sources of measurement variance untested.
Conclusion: We showed that ID-CT is used with a wide variation in approach and limited reporting prevents the establishment of its true diagnostic accuracy.
Downloads
References
Puijk R, Singh J, Puijk R H, Laende E K, Plevier J W M, Nolte P A, et al. Evaluation and refinement of thresholds for early migration of total knee replacements as an estimator of late aseptic loosening: an updated systematic review of RSA and survival studies. Acta Orthop 2025; 96: 1-10. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42574
Jun B J, Ricchetti E T, Haladik J, Bey M J, Patterson T E, Subhas N, et al. Validation of a 3D CT imaging method for quantifying implant migration following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2022; 40(6): 1270-80. doi: 10.1002/jor.25170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25170
Streit M R, Haeussler D, Bruckner T, Proctor T, Innmann M M, Merle C, et al. Early migration predicts aseptic loosening of cementless femoral stems: a long-term study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474(7): 1697-706. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4857-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4857-5
Pijls B G, Nieuwenhuijse M J, Fiocco M, Plevier J W, Middeldorp S, Nelissen R G, et al. Early proximal migration of cups is associated with late revision in THA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 RSA studies and 49 survival studies. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(6): 583-91. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.745353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.745353
van der Lugt J C, Valstar E R, Witvoet-Braam S W, Nelissen R G. Migration of the humeral component of the Souter-Strathclyde elbow prosthesis: a long-term RSA study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92(2): 235-41. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.92b2.22636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B2.22636
Ooms E M, ten Brinke B, Mathijssen N M C, Blom I F, Deijkers R L M, Kraan G A. Feasibility of model-based Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis to evaluate early migration of the trapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16(1): 295. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0747-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0747-3
Ten Brinke B, Beumer A, Koenraadt K L M, Eygendaal D, Kraan G A, Mathijssen N M C. The accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in upper limb arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2017; 88(3): 320-5. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1291872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1291872
Kaptein B L, Pijls B, Koster L, Kärrholm J, Hull M, Niesen A, et al. Guideline for RSA and CT-RSA implant migration measurements: an update of standardizations and recommendations. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 256-67. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40709
Olivecrona L, Crafoord J, Olivecrona H, Noz M E, Maguire G Q, Zeleznik M P, et al. Acetabular component migration in total hip arthroplasty using CT and a semiautomated program for volume merging. Acta Radiol 2002; 43(5): 517-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/rsmacta.43.5.517
Van de Vusse S F, De Laat N N, Koster L A, Kaptein B L. The accuracy and precision of CT-RSA in arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 2025; 96: 295-303. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.43334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43900
Toksvig-Larsen S, Ryd L, Lindstrand A. Effect of a cooled saw blade on prosthesis fixation: randomized radiostereometry of 33 knee cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65(5): 533-7. doi: 10.3109/17453679409000908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679409000908
Bragonzoni L, Russo A, Loreti I, Montagna L, Visani A, Marcacci M. The stress-inducible displacement detected through RSA in non-migrating UKR. Knee 2005; 12(4): 301-6. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2004.09.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2004.09.006
Dunbar M J, Fong J W, Wilson D A, Hennigar A W, Francis P A, Glazebrook M A. Longitudinal migration and inducible displacement of the Mobility Total Ankle System. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(4): 394-400. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.712890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.712890
Lam Tin Cheung K, Lanting B A, McCalden R W, Yuan X, MacDonald S J, Naudie D D, et al. Inducible displacement of cemented tibial components ten years after total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-b(2): 170-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.100b2.Bjj-2017-0428.R2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B2.BJJ-2017-0428.R2
Tricco A C, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K K, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169(7): 467-73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Whiting P F, Rutjes A W S, Westwood M E, Mallett S, Deeks J J, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155(8): 529-36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
Olivecrona H, Olivecrona L, Weidenhielm L, Noz M E, Kardos J, Maguire G Q Jr, et al. A new technique for diagnosis of acetabular cup loosening using computed tomography: preliminary experience in 10 patients. Acta Orthop 2008; 79(3): 346-53. doi: 10.1080/17453670710015247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710015247
Polus J S, Kaptein B L, Vasarhelyi E M, Lanting B A, Teeter M G. Evaluation of conventional and CT-based radiostereometric analysis for inducible displacement measurements after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2025; 43(1): 192-9. doi: 10.1002/jor.25981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25981
Malfroy Camine V, Rüdiger H A, Pioletti DP , Terrier A. Full-field measurement of micromotion around a cementless femoral stem using micro-CT imaging and radiopaque markers. J Biomech 2016; 49(16): 4002-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.029
Gortchacow M, Wettstein M, Pioletti D P, Terrier A. A new technique to measure micromotion distribution around a cementless femoral stem. J Biomech 2011; 44(3): 557-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.09.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.09.023
Gortchacow M, Wettstein M, Pioletti D P, Müller-Gerbl M, Terrier A. Simultaneous and multisite measure of micromotion, subsidence and gap to evaluate femoral stem stability. J Biomech 2012; 45(7): 1232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.040
Malfroy Camine V, Rüdiger H, Pioletti D P, Terrier A. Distribution of gap and micromotion during compressive loading around a cementless femoral stem. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2015; 18(Suppl 1): 1896-7. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2015.1069626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2015.1069626
Malfroy Camine V, Rüdiger H A, Pioletti D P, Terrier A. Effect of a collar on subsidence and local micromotion of cementless femoral stems: in vitro comparative study based on micro-computerised tomography. Int Orthop 2018; 42(1): 49-57. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3524-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3524-0
Sandberg O, Olivecrona H, Gustafson P. Adverse events due to lack of precision in total hip arthroplasty: the potential of provocation-based CT for diagnosis of implant loosening. Sci World J 2021; 2021:8836687. doi: 10.1155/2021/8836687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8836687
Sandberg O, Carlsson S, Harbom E, Cappelen V, Tholén S, Olivecrona H, et al. Inducible displacement CT increases the diagnostic accuracy of aseptic loosening in primary total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2022; 93: 831-6. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.5240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.5240
Listopadzki T R, Boyle K K, Nodzo S R. Computed tomography with implant movement analysis in the work-up of painful total hip prostheses. J Arthroplasty 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.012
Kievit A J, Buijs G S, Dobbe J G G, Ter Wee A, Kerkhoffs G, Streekstra G J, et al. Promising results of an non-invasive measurement of knee implant loosening using a loading device, CT-scans and 3D image analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol) 2023; 104: 105930. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.105930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.105930
Ter Wee M A, Dobbe J G G, Buijs G S, Kievit A J, Schafroth M U, Maas M, et al. Load-induced deformation of the tibia and its effect on implant loosening detection. Sci Rep 2023; 13(1): 21769. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49177-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49177-z
Buijs G S, Kievit A J, Ter Wee M A, Magg C, Dobbe J G G, Streekstra G J, et al. Non-invasive quantitative assessment of induced component displacement can safely and accurately diagnose tibial component loosening in patients: a prospective diagnostic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2025; 33(1): 274-85. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12299.
Buijs G S, Ter Wee M A, Klein C, Mokkink L B, Dobbe J G G, Maas M, et al. Operator variation in applying a knee loading device for evaluation of tibial component loosening in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol) 2025; 126:106531. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106531
Wretenberg P, Tholen S, Carlsson S, Olivecrona H. Implant movement analysis (IMA), a new CT based technique for diagnosis of aseptic loosening of total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Res Online J 2021; 8(3). doi: 10.31031/OPROJ.2021.08.000690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31031/OPROJ.2021.08.000690
Hext R A, Kaptein B L, Howard J L, Lanting B A, Teeter M G. Inducible displacement of cementless total knee arthroplasty components with conventional and weight-bearing CT-based radiostereometric analysis. J Orthop Res 2025; 43(3): 640-9. doi: 10.1002/jor.26017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26017
Svensson P A, Tsagkozis P, Olivecrona H. CT-based implant motion analysis for diagnosing loosening of megaprostheses: validation in a clinical setting. Bone Joint J 2025; 107-b(5): 556-60. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.107b5.Bjj-2024-0517.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B5.BJJ-2024-0517.R1
Svedmark P, Lundh F, Németh G, Noz M E, Maguire G Q Jr, Zeleznik M P, et al. Motion analysis of total cervical disc replacements using computed tomography: preliminary experience with nine patients and a model. Acta Radiol 2011; 52(10): 1128-37. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2011.110230
Skeppholm M, Svedmark P, Noz M E, Maguire G Q Jr, Olivecrona H, Olerud C. Evaluation of mobility and stability in the Discover artificial disc: an in vivo motion study using high-accuracy 3D CT data. J Neurosurg Spine 2015; 23(3): 383-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.Spine14813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14813
Svedmark P, Berg S, Noz M E, Maguire G Jr, Zeleznik M P, Weidenhielm L, et al. A new CT method for assessing 3D movements in lumbar facet joints and vertebrae in patients before and after TDR. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 260703. doi: 10.1155/2015/260703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/260703
Svedmark P, Weidenhielm L, Nemeth G, Tullberg T, Noz M E, Maguire G Q Jr, et al. Model studies on segmental movement in lumbar spine using a semi-automated program for volume fusion. Comput Aided Surg 2008; 13(1): 14-22. doi: 10.3109/10929080701882549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/10929080701882549
Reiser D, Kakar S, Sandberg O, Wretenberg P, Sagerfors M. CT motion-analysis of implant loosening in total wrist arthroplasty: a pilot study. J Wrist Surg 2025. doi: 10.1055/a-2528-0045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2528-0045
Sandberg O H, Kärrholm J, Olivecrona H, Röhrl S M, Sköldenberg O G, Brodén C. Computed tomography-based radiostereometric analysis in orthopedic research: practical guidelines. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 373-8. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.15337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.15337
Øhrn F D, Engseth L H W, Pripp A H, Schulz A, Röhrl S M H. Precision of computer tomography based RSA on femoral implants in total knee arthroplasty: a porcine cadaver study. Clin Biomech (Bristol) 2025; 123: 106456. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106456
Goetti P, Lannes X, Becce F, Farron A, Hoffmann L, Terrier A. Five-year outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with Aequalis Perform+ posterior augmented glenoid implants in Walch B2 and B3 glenoids. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.04.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.04.001
de Laat N N, Koster L A, Stoel B C, Nelissen R, Kaptein B L. Accuracy and precision of Volumetric Matching Micromotion Analysis (V3MA) is similar to RSA for tibial component migration in TKA. J Orthop Res 2025; 43(2): 311-21. doi: 10.1002/jor.25989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25989
Engseth L H W, Schulz A, Pripp A H, Röhrl S M H, Øhrn F D. CT-based migration analysis is more precise than radiostereometric analysis for tibial implants: a phantom study on a porcine cadaver. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 207-14. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.12306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.12306
Clarke S G, Logishetty K, Halewood C, Cobb J P. Low dose CT-based spatial analysis (CTSA) to measure implant migration after ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA): a phantom study. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2023; 237(3): 359-67. doi: 10.1177/09544119231153905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119231153905
Brodén C, Reilly P, Khanna M, Popat R, Olivecrona H, Griffiths D, et al. CT-based micromotion analysis method can assess early implant migration and development of radiolucent lines in cemented glenoid components: a clinical feasibility study. Acta Orthop 2022; 93: 277-83. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.1976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.1976
Brodén C, Giles J W, Popat R, Fetherston S, Olivecrona H, Sandberg O, et al. Accuracy and precision of a CT method for assessing migration in shoulder arthroplasty: an experimental study. Acta Radiol 2020; 61(6): 776-82. doi: 10.1177/0284185119882659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185119882659
Angelomenos V, Shareghi B, Itayem R, Mohaddes M. Comparison of the CT-based micromotion analysis method versus marker-based RSA in measuring femoral head translation and evaluation of its intra- and interobserver reliability: a prospective agreement diagnostic study on 27 patients up to 1 year. Acta Orthop 2025; 96: 38-44. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42705
Christensson A, Nemati H M, Flivik G. Comparison between model-based RSA and an AI-based CT-RSA: an accuracy study of 30 patients. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 39-46. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.35749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.35749
Lundin N, Olivecrona H, Bakhshayesh P, Gordon Murkes L, Enocson A. Computed tomography micromotion analysis in the follow-up of patients with surgically treated pelvic fractures: a prospective clinical study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2023; 33(7): 3143-51. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03542-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03542-w
Angelomenos V, Mohaddes M, Itayem R, Shareghi B. Precision of low-dose CT-based micromotion analysis technique for the assessment of early acetabular cup migration compared with gold standard RSA: a prospective study of 30 patients up to 1 year. Acta Orthop 2022; 93: 459-65. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.2528.
Stigbrand H, Brown K, Olivecrona H, Ullmark G. Implant migration and bone mineral density measured simultaneously by low-dose CT scans: a 2-year study on 17 acetabular revisions with impaction bone grafting. Acta Orthop 2020; 91(5): 571-5. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1769295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1769295
Sandberg O, Tholén S, Carlsson S, Wretenberg P. The anatomical SP-CL stem demonstrates a non-progressing migration pattern in the first year: a low dose CT-based migration study in 20 patients. Acta Orthop 2020; 91(6): 654-9. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1832294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1832294
Brodén C, Sandberg O, Sköldenberg O, Stigbrand H, Hänni M, Giles J W, et al. Low-dose CT-based implant motion analysis is a precise tool for early migration measurements of hip cups: a clinical study of 24 patients. Acta Orthop 2020; 91(3): 260-5. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1725345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1725345
Øhrn F D, Engseth L H W, Pripp A H, Röhrl S M H, Schulz A. Dose reduction does not impact the precision of CT-based RSA in tibial implants: a diagnostic accuracy study on precision in a porcine cadaver. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 550-44. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.24022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.24022
Engseth L H W, Øhrn F D, Schulz A, Röhrl S M. CT-based migration analysis of a tibial component compared to radiostereometric analysis: one-year results of a prospective single-group implant safety study. Bone Joint J 2025; 107-b(2): 173-80. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.107b2.Bjj-2024-0356.R2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0356.R2
Ricchetti E T, Jun B J, Jin Y, Ho J C, Patterson T E, Dalton J E, et al. Relationship between glenoid component shift and osteolysis after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: three-dimensional computed tomography analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103(15): 1417-30. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.20.00833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.00833
ter Wee M A, Speelman R P J, Dobbe J G G, Kievit A J, Maas M, Blankevoort L, et al. The effect of CT scanning and metal artefact reduction strategies on measuring knee implant displacement: iMAR—helpful or harmful? Eur J Radiol 2025; 191: 112281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112281
Angelomenos V, Mohaddes M, Itayem R, Shareghi B. Precision of low-dose CT-based micromotion analysis technique for the assessment of early acetabular cup migration compared with gold standard RSA: a prospective study of 30 patients up to 1 year. Acta Orthop 2022; 93: 459-65. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.2528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.2528
Buijs G S, Kievit A J, Ter Wee M A, Magg C, Dobbe J G G, Streekstra G J, et al. Non-invasive quantitative assessment of induced component displacement can safely and accurately diagnose tibial component loosening in patients: a prospective diagnostic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2024. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12299
Niesen A E, Garverick A L, Hull M L. Maximum total point motion of five points versus all points in assessing tibial baseplate stability. J Biomech Eng 2021; 143(11): 114502. doi: 10.1115/1.4051347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051347
Buijs G S, Kievit A J, Walinga A B, Schafroth M U, Hirschmann M T, Blankevoort L, et al. Visible fluid motion on manipulation as the new threshold for intraoperatively determined knee arthroplasty component loosening: a Delphi study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2025; 33(1): 343-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12357
O’Donovan P, McAleese T, Harty J. Does lucency equate to revision? A five-year retrospective review of Attune and Triathlon total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023; 31(11): 4773-81. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07509-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07509-6
Ng H J H, Tan G K Y, Tan R G, Kau C Y. Incidence of radiolucent lines after cemented total knee arthroplasty. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2022; 10(1): 85-91. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2021.54610.2723.
Wautier D, Thienpont E. Appearance and evolution of radiolucent lines below the tibial implant in primary total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024; 144(3): 1333-44. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05100-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05100-9
Wautier D, Ftaïta S, Thienpont E. Radiolucent lines around knee arthroplasty components: a narrative review. Acta Orthop Belg 2020; 86(1): 82-94. doi: url: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:219283936.
Abrahams J M, Kim Y S, Callary S A, De Ieso C, Costi K, Howie D W, et al. The diagnostic performance of radiographic criteria to detect aseptic acetabular component loosening after revision total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-b(4): 458-64. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b4.Bjj-2016-0804.R1.
Abrahams J M, Kim Y S, Callary S A, Ieso CD, Costi K, Howie D W, et al. The diagnostic performance of radiographic criteria to detect aseptic acetabular component loosening after revision total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B(4): 458-64. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b4.Bjj-2016-0804.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-0804.R1
Temmerman O P, Raijmakers P G, Berkhof J, David E F, Pijpers R, Molenaar M A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of plain radiography, subtraction arthrography, nuclear arthrography, and bone scintigraphy in the assessment of aseptic femoral component loosening. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006; 126(5): 316-23. doi: 10.1007/s00402-006-0120-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-006-0120-y
Jedenmalm A, Noz M E, Olivecrona H, Olivecrona L, Stark A. A new approach for assessment of wear in metal-backed acetabular cups using computed tomography: a phantom study with retrievals. Acta Orthop 2008; 79(2): 218-24. doi: 10.1080/17453670710015003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710015003
Noz M E, Maguire G Q, Zeleznik M P, Kramer E L, Mahmoud F, Crafoord J. A versatile functional-anatomic image fusion method for volume data sets. J Med Syst 2001; 25(5): 297-307. doi: 10.1023/A:1010633123512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010633123512
Gorniak R J, Kramer E L, Maguire G Q Jr, Noz M E, Schettino C J, Zeleznik M P. Evaluation of a semiautomatic 3D fusion technique applied to molecular imaging and MRI brain/frame volume data sets. J Med Syst 2003; 27(2): 141-56. doi: 10.1023/a:1021860910856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021860910856
Lorensen W E, Cline H E. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques 1987: 163-9. doi: 10.1145/37401.37422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/37401.37422
Nelder J A, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Computer J 1965; 7(4): 308-13. doi: 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever M A, Pluim J P W. Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010; 29(1): 196-205. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2035616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2009.2035616
Leys C, Ley C, Klein O, Bernard P, Licata L. Detecting outliers: do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. J Exp Soc Psychol 2013; 49(4): 764-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013
Ranstam J, Ryd L, Önsten I. Accurate accuracy assessment: review of basic principles. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71(1): 106-8. doi: 10.1080/00016470052944017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470052944017
Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1(8476): 307-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maaike A ter Wee, Johannes G G Dobbe, Arthur J Kievit, Matthias U Schafroth, Mario Maas, Leendert Blankevoort, Geert J Streekstra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
