Migration patterns of uncemented femoral stems in hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical radiostereometric analysis cohort studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.45412Keywords:
Arthroplasty, Femoral, Hip, Implants, Osteoarthrosis, Radiological imaging, Radiostereometric analysisAbstract
Background and purpose: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of radiostereometric analysis studies of primary uncemented femoral stems to investigate their subsidence and retroversion patterns and the migration patterns according to implant, patient, and study characteristics.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase databases to identify all radiostereometric analysis studies on femoral stem migration following primary uncemented total hip replacement was performed. Clinical studies with 2 or more postoperative radiostereometric measurements within 2 years were included. Subsidence and retroversion at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, 1, 2, 5, and 10 years were included for analysis. Extracted implant characteristics included implant design, coating, and surgical approach. Data was analyzed using a random effects model.
Results: 73 studies on 120 cohorts and 2,970 uncemented stems were included. 119 cohorts reported on subsidence and 91 on retroversion. The pooled subsidence at 3 months was 0.29 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19–0.39) and 0.32 mm (CI 0.21–0.43) at 2 years. The pooled retroversion at 3 months was 0.51° (CI 0.33–0.70) and 0.70° (CI 0.48–0.93) at 2 years. Hydroxyapatite-coated stems showed the least migration (subsidence 0.26 mm; CI 0.13–0.40; retroversion 0.51°; CI 0.22–0.80) among different coating types. The anterior approach showed more migration (subsidence 1.04 mm, CI 0.53–1.55; retroversion 1.52°, CI 1.08–1.95) than other surgical approaches.
Conclusion: Our study shows that most subsidence and retroversion of uncemented femoral stems occurs during the first 3 months. Stabilization of subsidence occurred after 3 months, and retroversion stabilized after 2 years. Migration patterns differ based on stem type, coating, surgical approach, the time period when inclusion started, and timing of baseline measurement.
Downloads
References
Leitner L, Türk S, Heidinger M, Stöckl B, Posch F, Maurer-Ertl W, et al. Trends and economic impact of hip and knee arthroplasty in Central Europe: findings from the Austrian National database. Sci Rep 2018; 8(1): 4707. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23266-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23266-w
Clar C, Leitner L, Koutp A, Hauer G, Rasic L, Leithner A, et al. The worldwide survival rate of total hip arthroplasties is improving: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide hip arthroplasty registers. EFORT Open Rev 2024; 9(8): 745-50. doi: 10.1530/eor-23-0080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0080
Ryd L, Albrektsson B, Carlsson L, Dansgard F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, et al. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77-B(3): 377-83. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.77b3.7744919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.77B3.7744919
Cho C H, Pijls B G, Abrahams J M, Roerink A, Katembwe R, Baker A, et al. Migration patterns of acetabular cups: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RSA studies. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 626-34. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.24580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.24580
van der Voort P, Pijls B G, Nieuwenhuijse M J, Jasper J, Fiocco M, Plevier J W, et al. Early subsidence of shape-closed hip arthroplasty stems is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 RSA studies and 56 survival studies. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(5): 575-85. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1043832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1043832
Kärrholm J, Borssén B, Löwenhielm G, Snorrason F. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4–7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76(6): 912-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.76B6.7983118
Nistor L, Blaha J D, Kjellström U, Selvik G. In vivo measurements of relative motion between an uncemented femoral total hip component and the femur by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; 269: 220-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199108000-00031
Luites J W H, Spruit M, van Hellemondt G G, Horstmann W G, Valstar E R. Failure of the uncoated titanium ProxiLock femoral hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 448: 79-86. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000224011.12175.83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000224011.12175.83
Page M J, McKenzie J E, Bossuyt P M, Boutron I, Hoffmann T C, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med 2021; 18(3): e1003583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583
Hasan S, van Dijk L A, Nelissen R G, Plevier J W, Blankevoort L, Pijls B G. RSA migration of unicondylar knee arthroplasties is comparable to migration of total knee arthroplasties: a meta-analysis. J ISAKOS 2022; 7(3): 17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2021.12.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2021.12.002
Pijls B G, Nieuwenhuijse M J, Fiocco M, Plevier J W, Middeldorp S, Nelissen R G, et al. Early proximal migration of cups is associated with late revision in THA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 RSA studies and 49 survival studies. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(6): 583-91. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.745353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.745353
Pijls B G, Valstar E R, Nouta K A, Plevier J W, Fiocco M, Middeldorp S, et al. Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(6): 614-24. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.747052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.747052
Liu Y W, Zou D H, Dong H W, Liu Y Y, Fu E H, Tian Z L, et al. An open-source interactive AI framework for assisting automatic literature review in forensic medicine: focus on brain injury mechanisms. PLoS One 2025; 20(8): e0329349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329349
Pijls B G. Machine learning assisted systematic reviewing in orthopaedics. J Orthop 2024; 48: 103-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.051
Radaelli M, Buchalter D B, Mont M A, Schwarzkopf R, Hepinstall M S. A new classification system for cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38(3): 502-10. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.09.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.09.014
Drevon D, Fursa S R, Malcolm A L. Intercoder reliability and validity of WebPlotDigitizer in extracting graphed data. Behav Modif 2017; 41(2): 323-39. doi: 10.1177/0145445516673998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516673998
Rohatgi A. WebPlotDigitizer [Internet]. Automeris; 2024 [cited 2025 May 14]. Available from: https://automeris.io
Hozo S P, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-13
Dekkers O M, Vandenbroucke J P, Cevallos M, Renehan A G, Altman D G, Egger M. COSMOS-E: guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology. PLoS Med 2019; 16(2): e1002742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002742
Siedler M R, Mustafa R A, Lin L, Morgan R L, Falck-Ytter Y, Dahm P, et al. Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a user’s guide for analysis and interpretation. BMJ Evid Based Med 2024; 30(5): 340-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113031
Higgins J P, Li T, Deeks J J, editors. Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect [last updated August 2023]. In: Higgins J P, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M J, et al., editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chapter 6. Version 6.5: Cochrane; 2024. Available from: https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-06
Yale University. Mean and variance of random variables [Internet]. Yale University Statistics Department; 1997 [cited 2024 September 27]. Available from: https://www.stat.yale.edu/Courses/1997-98/101/rvmnvar.htm.
Freedman D, Pisani R, Purves R. Statistics. 4th ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company; 2007.
Walter S D, Yao X. Effect sizes can be calculated for studies reporting ranges for outcome variables in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60(8): 849-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.003
Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res 2018; 27(6): 1785-805. doi: 10.1177/0962280216669183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280216669183
Shi J, Luo D, Wan X, Liu Y, Liu J, Bian Z, et al. Detecting the skewness of data from the five-number summary and its application in meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 2023; 32(7): 1338-60. doi: 10.1177/09622802231172043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802231172043
Shi J, Luo D, Weng H, Zeng X T, Lin L, Chu H, et al. Optimally estimating the sample standard deviation from the five-number summary. Res Synth Methods 2020; 11(5): 641-54. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1429
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14: 135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
Pijls B G, Plevier J W M, Nelissen R. RSA migration of total knee replacements. Acta Orthop 2018; 89(3): 320-8. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1443635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1443635
Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 2010; 36(3): 1-48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v036.i03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
Kaptein B L, Pijls B, Koster L, Kärrholm J, Hull M, Niesen A, et al. Guideline for RSA and CT-RSA implant migration measurements: an update of standardizations and recommendations. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 256-67. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40709
Pijls B G, Dekkers O M, Middeldorp S, Valstar E R, van der Heide H J, Van der Linden-Van der Zwaag H M, et al. AQUILA: assessment of quality in lower limb arthroplasty. An expert Delphi consensus for total knee and total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-173
LROI. Reasons for revision [Internet]. ‘s-Hertogenbosch: LROI; 2024 [cited 2025 April 25]. Available from: https://www.lroi.nl/jaarrapportage/hip/hip-revision-arthroplasty/reasons-for-revision/
Huang X T, Liu D G, Jia B, Xu Y X. Comparisons between direct anterior approach and lateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty in postoperative orthopaedic complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Surg 2021; 13(6): 1707-20. doi: 10.1111/os.13101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13101
Hoskins W, Bingham R, Lorimer M, Hatton A, de Steiger R N. Early rate of revision of total hip arthroplasty related to surgical approach: an analysis of 122,345 primary total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102(21): 1874-82. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.19.01289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01289
Huang L, Han W, Qi W, Zhang X, Lv Z, Lu Y, et al. Early unrestricted vs. partial weight bearing after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg 2023; 10: 1225649. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1225649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1225649
Zhao A Y, Parel P M, Agarwal A R, Gu A, Ranson R A, Das A, et al. Increased risk of 10-year revision following total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. J Arthroplasty 2025; 40(3): 688-92. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.09.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.09.012
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lisa van der Water, Christiaan H Righolt, Trevor Gascoyne, Bart L Kaptein, Rob G H H Nelissen, Bart G C W Pijls
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
