Patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcome measures after primary ankle arthrodesis: 2-year results from the Swedish Ankle Registry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.45374Keywords:
Ankle arthrodesis, Ankle fusion, Ankle osteoarthritis, Foot and ankle, Osteoarthrosis, Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAbstract
Background and purpose: Ankle arthrodesis (AA) and total ankle replacement are the 2 main surgical treatment options for advanced ankle arthritis but information is scarce on satisfaction and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after surgery. We aimed to evaluate postoperative satisfaction, changes in PROMs from before to 2 years after AA, and factors associated with the outcome.
Methods: This is a national registry-based observational study using the Swedish Ankle Registry. We identified 1,145 patients who underwent AA between 2008 and 2020 who answered a question on satisfaction, and between 662 and 702 patients who answered pre- and 2-year postoperative PROMs (SElf reported Foot and Ankle Score [SEFAS], EQ-5D index, and EQ-5D VAS). We analyzed changes in scores and associations between surgical/patient factors (including preoperative PROMs) and the outcomes satisfaction/postoperative PROM score.
Results: All mean PROM scores improved from before to 2 years postoperatively (all P < 0.001). 69% of the patients were satisfied with the procedure, 15% uncertain, and 16% dissatisfied. Satisfaction was associated with higher preoperative SEFAS score and dissatisfaction with lower preoperative SEFAS score. Higher SEFAS score was associated with male sex and osteoarthritis (compared with rheumatoid arthritis), while higher EQ-5D index and EQ-5D VAS scores were associated with male sex, posttraumatic arthritis, osteoarthritis (compared with rheumatoid arthritis), and higher age.
Conclusion: The majority (69%) of patients treated with AA are satisfied with the procedure and a higher preoperative SEFAS score is associated with postoperative satisfaction. We speculate that preoperative SEFAS score may be useful for predicting postoperative outcomes and will facilitate preoperative patient discussions on expected results.
Downloads
References
Goldberg A J, Chowdhury K, Bordea E, Hauptmannova I, Blackstone J, Brooking D, et al. Total ankle replacement versus arthrodesis for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175: 1648-57. doi: 10.7326/M22-2058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M22-2058
Ferguson Z, Anugraha A, Janghir N, Pillai A. Ankle arthrodesis: a long term review of the literature. J Orthop 2019; 16: 430-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.08.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2019.08.004
Adukia V, Mangwani J, Issac R, Hussain S, Parker L. Current concepts in the management of ankle arthritis. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2020; 11: 388-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.03.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.03.020
Henricson A, Kamrad I, Rosengren B, Carlsson A. Bilateral arthrodesis of the ankle joint: self-reported outcomes in 35 patients from the Swedish Ankle Registry. J Foot Ankle Surg 2016; 55: 1195-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.07.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2016.07.014
Hendrickx R P, Stufkens S A, de Bruijn E E, Sierevelt I N, van Dijk C N, Kerkhoffs G M. Medium- to long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 2011; 32: 940-7. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2011.0940
Nogod S, Khairy A M M Jr, Nubi O G, Fatooh M S, Mohammed Ali Abd-Elmaged H. Ankle arthrodesis: indications, outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Cureus 2023; 15: e37177. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37177
Younger A S, Wing K J, Glazebrook M, Daniels T R, Dryden P J, Lalonde K A, et al. Patient expectation and satisfaction as measures of operative outcome in end-stage ankle arthritis: a prospective cohort study of total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion. Foot Ankle Int 2015; 36: 12334. doi: 10.1177/1071100714565902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100714565902
Coester L M, Saltzman C L, Leupold J, Pontarelli W. Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 219-28. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200102000-00009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200102000-00009
Waly F J, Yeo E M N, Wing K J, Penner M J, Veljkovic A, Younger A S E. Relationship of preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to postoperative success in end-stage ankle arthritis. Foot Ankle Int 2020; 41: 253-8. doi: 10.1177/1071100719893334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100719893334
Dodd A, Pinsker E, Younger A S E, Penner M J, Wing K J, Dryden P J, et al. Sex differences in end-stage ankle arthritis and following total ankle replacement or ankle arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104: 221-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.00287
Swedish Ankle Registry. Annual report 2024. Available from: http://www.swedankle.se
Coster M C, Bremander A, Rosengren B E, Magnusson H, Carlsson A, Karlsson M K. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) in forefoot, hindfoot, and ankle disorders. Acta Orthop 2014; 85: 187-94. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.889979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.889979
Arbab D, Kuhlmann K, Schnurr C, Luring C, Konig D, Bouillon B. Comparison of the Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Surg 2019; 25: 361-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.01.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2018.01.003
Coster M C, Rosengren B E, Bremander A, Brudin L, Karlsson M K. Comparison of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS). Foot Ankle Int 2014; 35: 1031-6. doi: 10.1177/1071100714543647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100714543647
Strand V, Boers M, Idzerda L, Kirwan J R, Kvien T K, Tugwell P S, et al. It’s good to feel better but it’s better to feel good and even better to feel good as soon as possible for as long as possible. Response criteria and the importance of change at OMERACT 10. J Rheumatol 2011; 38: 1720-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.110392
Coster M C, Nilsdotter A, Brudin L, Bremander A. Minimally important change, measurement error, and responsiveness for the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score. Acta Orthop 2017; 88: 300-4. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1293445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1293445
Rajapakshe S, Sutherland J M, Wing K, Crump T, Liu G, Penner M, et al. Health and quality of life outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for end-stage ankle arthritis. Foot Ankle Int 2019; 40: 1129-39. doi: 10.1177/1071100719856888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100719856888
Henricson A, Fredriksson M, Carlsson A. Total ankle replacement and contralateral ankle arthrodesis in 16 patients from the Swedish Ankle Registry: Self-reported function and satisfaction. Foot Ankle Surg 2016; 22: 32-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.04.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2015.04.007
Kamrad I, Henricson A, Magnusson H, Carlsson A, Rosengren B E. Outcome After salvage arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 2016; 37: 255-61. doi: 10.1177/1071100715617508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100715617508
Kamrad I, Carlsson A, Henricson A, Magnusson H, Karlsson M K, Rosengren B E. Good outcome scores and high satisfaction rate after primary total ankle replacement. Acta Orthop 2017; 88: 675-80. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1366405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1366405
Coster M C, Rosengren B E, Karlsson M K, Carlsson A. Age- and gender-specific normative values for the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS). Foot Ankle Int 2018; 39: 1328-34. doi: 10.1177/1071100718788499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718788499
Burstrom K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F. Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res 2001; 10: 621-35. doi: 10.1023/a:1013171831202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013171831202
Teni F S, Rolfson O, Devlin N, Parkin D, Naucler E, Burstrom K, et al. Longitudinal study of patients’ health-related quality of life using EQ-5D-3L in 11 Swedish National Quality Registers. BMJ Open 2022; 12: e048176. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048176
Kim J, Lonner J H, Nelson C L, Lotke P A. Response bias: effect on outcomes evaluation by mail surveys after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 15-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200401000-00004
Zini M L L, Banfi G. A narrative literature review of bias in collecting patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs). Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312445, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312445
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alexandra Undén, Lars Jehpsson, Anders Henricson, Magnus K Karlsson, Björn E Rosengren
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
