The long-term revision risk of RSA-tested and non-RSA-tested TKA implants in The Netherlands: a Dutch arthroplasty register study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.45293Keywords:
Arthroplasty, Implants, Knee, Radiological imaging, RSAAbstract
Background and purpose: Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is used as an early safeguard during the phased evidence-based introduction of new implants. The goal of our study was to compare the long-term revision risk between RSA-tested implants and non-RSA-tested implants in the Netherlands using patient-level data.
Methods: All primary TKAs between 2007 and 2016 from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register were included, and procedures with an RSA-tested implant were identified. Both all-cause major revision risk and revision risk because of loosening were calculated at 5 and 10 years postoperatively using Kaplan–Meier analyses. Sensitivity analyses were performed with stricter definitions of implant characteristics to classify procedures as RSA-tested, to avoid camouflage of different subdesigns within the same brand implant portfolio.
Results: 83,638 RSA-tested and 104,105 non-RSA-tested TKAs were included. Cumulative all-cause major revision percentages for the RSA-tested group at 5 and 10 years were 2.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1–2.3) and 3.6% (CI 3.4–3.7), respectively, compared with 2.5% (CI 2.4–2.6) and 3.3% (CI 3.2–3.4) for the non-RSA-tested group. RSA-tested TKAs showed higher 10-year revision risks because of loosening than non-RSA-tested procedures (1.8%, CI 1.7–1.9 vs 1.4%, CI 1.3–1.4, respectively). Comparable results were found after stratification by various patient characteristics and with stricter classification approaches.
Conclusion: Regarding all-cause revision risk, RSA-tested TKAs had a slightly lower risk at 5 years. However, at 10 years the RSA-tested TKAs had a higher all-cause revision risk and higher revision risk because of loosening compared with the non-RSA-tested TKAs.
Downloads
References
Nelissen R G, Pijls B G, Kärrholm J, Malchau H, Nieuwenhuijse M J, Valstar E R. RSA and registries: the quest for phased introduction of new implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93(Suppl 3): 62-5. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.K.00907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00907
Pijls B G, Valstar E R, Nouta K A, Plevier J W, Fiocco M, Middeldorp S, et al. Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(6): 614-24. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.747052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.747052
Pijls B G, Plevier J W M, Nelissen R. RSA migration of total knee replacements. Acta Orthop 2018; 89(3): 320-8. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1443635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1443635
Hasan S, Marang-van de Mheen P J, Kaptein B L, Nelissen R, Pijls B G. RSA-tested TKA implants on average have lower mean 10-year revision rates than non-RSA-tested designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478(6): 1232-41. doi: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001209
Wilton T, Skinner J A, Haddad F S. Camouflage uncovered: what should happen next? Bone Joint J 2023; 105-b(3): 221-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.105b3.Bjj-2023-0145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.105B3.BJJ-2023-0145
Phillips J R A, Tucker K. Implant brand portfolios, the potential for camouflage of data, and the role of the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-b(10): 1555-60. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.103b10.Bjj-2021-0284.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B10.BJJ-2021-0284.R1
Marang-van de Mheen P J, Nallamothu B K. Exclusions in the denominators of process-based quality measures: the missing link in understanding performance or ecological fallacy? BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 26(3): 169-73. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005254
van Steenbergen L N, Denissen G A, Spooren A, van Rooden S M, van Oosterhout F J, Morrenhof J W, et al. More than 95% completeness of reported procedures in the population-based Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(4): 498-505. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1028307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1028307
Denissen G A W, van Steenbergen L N, Lollinga W T, Verdonschot N J J, Schreurs B W, Nelissen R. Generic implant classification enables comparison across implant designs: the Dutch Arthroplasty Register implant library. EFORT Open Rev 2019; 4(6): 344-50. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180063
von Elm E, Altman D G, Egger M, Pocock S J, Gøtzsche P C, Vandenbroucke J P. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007; 370(9596): 1453-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61602-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
Ranstam J. Why the P-value culture is bad and confidence intervals a better alternative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012; 20(8): 805-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2012.04.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2012.04.001
Catani F, Leardini A, Ensini A, Cucca G, Bragonzoni L, Toksvig-Larsen S, et al. The stability of the cemented tibial component of total knee arthroplasty: posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized design. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(6): 775-82. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.01.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.01.013
Exactech. US Exactech Recall Information. Knee and Ankle Polyethylene 2022. Available from: https://www.exac.com/recall-information/
Gkiatas I, Karasavvidis T, Sharma A K, Xiang W, Malahias M A, Chalmers B P, et al. Highly cross-linked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with a lower rate of revision for aseptic loosening: a meta-analysis of 962,467 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142(6): 1177-84. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03887-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03887-z
Bonsignore L A, Goldberg V M, Greenfield E M. Machine oil inhibits the osseointegration of orthopaedic implants by impairing osteoblast attachment and spreading. J Orthop Res 2015; 33(7): 979-87. doi: 10.1002/jor.22850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22850
van der Lelij T J N, Kaptein B L, Tsonaka R, Nelissen R, Toksvig-Larsen S, Marang-van de Mheen P J. Tibial baseplate migration is not associated with change in patient-reported outcome measures and clinical scores after TKA: A secondary analysis of 5 radiostereometric analysis studies with 10-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2024; 106(16): 1479-85. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.23.00957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.00957
Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP). Available from: https://www.odep.org.uk/
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Thies J N van der Lelij, Bart G Pijls, Bart L Kaptein, Liza N van Steenbergen, Rob G H H Nelissen, Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
