Survivorship and risk factors for revision after total hip arthroplasty in patients 30 years and younger: a cohort study from the German arthroplasty register

Authors

  • Johanna Elliott German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD Deutsche Endoprothesenregister gGmbH), Berlin, Germany; University of Newcastle, Hunter New England Health District, NSW, Australia
  • Yinan Wu German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD Deutsche Endoprothesenregister gGmbH), Berlin, Germany
  • Arnd Steinbrück German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD Deutsche Endoprothesenregister gGmbH), Berlin; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
  • Alexander W Grimberg German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD Deutsche Endoprothesenregister gGmbH), Berlin, Germany https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8062-788X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.45042

Keywords:

Arthroplasty, German Arthroplasty Registry, Hip, Implant Survivorship, Paediatric orthopaedics

Abstract

Background and purpose: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients is rare but increasingly performed. We aimed to analyze implant survivorship and risk factors for revision in patients aged 30 years or less after THA based on the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD).
Methods: Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the EPRD dataset from 2013 to 2023 for factors associated with increased risk of revision. The primary outcome was first revision operation.
Results: 1,622 primary THAs in 1,452 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 26 years (range 11–30), 908 (56%) of whom were male. The most frequent diagnosis was secondary osteoarthritis (1,146, 72%), followed by osteonecrosis (357, 22%), and hip dysplasia (53, 3.2%). Of all THAs, 1,601 (99%) were uncemented, and 1,574 (97%) received ceramic heads. The average follow-up period was 3.7 years (range 0–10.6). 47 hips were revised with a cumulative revision rate (CRR) at 8 years of 4.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8–7.3). The most frequent revision cause was infection in 11 cases (0.7%). Increased revision risk was associated with pediatric hip disease for those with prior surgery for Perthes, HR 4.3 (CI 1.9–9.6), pelvic osteotomy HR 2.8 (CI 1.1–7.5), and a primary diagnosis of hip dysplasia, HR 3.4 (CI 1.3–8.5).
Conclusion: Uncemented THA in young patients demonstrated a revision rate of 4.6% (CI 2.8–7.3), which we believe is a satisfactory mid-term survival. Patients with pediatric hip disease present the highest risk of revision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Girard J, Glorion C, Bonnomet F, Fron D, Migaud H. Risk factors for revision of hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 30 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 1141-17. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1669-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1669-x

Peagler C L Jr, Dobek A J, Tabaie S. Trends in the use of total hip arthroplasty in the pediatric population: a review of the literature. Cureus 2023; 15: e43978. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43978

Guarin Perez S F, Restrepo D J, Lee S H, Stuart M B, Trousdale R T, Berry D J, et al. In young patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, is there a correlation between activity level and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene? JB JS Open Access 2025; 10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00242

Nordbo J V, Straume-Naesheim T M, Hallan G, Fenstad A M, Sivertsen E A, Aroen A. Physical activity and the risk of aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2025; 26: 639. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08865-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08865-9

Mohaddes M, Naucle R E, Karrholm J, Malchau H, Odin D, Rolfson O. Implant survival and patient-reported outcome following total hip arthroplasty i patients 30 years or younger: a matched cohort study of 1,008 patients in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2019; 90: 249-52. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1599776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1599776

Kahlenberg C A, Swarup I, Krell E C, Heinz N, Figgie M P. Causes of revision in young patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34: 1435-40. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.014

Gala L, Clohisy J C, Beaule P E. Hip dysplasia in the young adult. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98: 63-73. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.O.00109

van Kouswijk H W, Bus M P A, Gademan M G J, Nelissen R, de Witte P B. Total hip arthroplasty in children: a Dutch Arthroplasty Register study with data from 283 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2025; 107: 811-18. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00657

Robison L L, Armstrong G T, Boice J D, Chow E J, Davies S M, Donaldson S S, et al. The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a National Cancer Institute-supported resource for outcome and intervention research. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 2308-18. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3339

Pilz V, Hanstein T, Skripitz R. Projections of primary hip arthroplasty in Germany until 2040. Acta Orthop 2018; 89: 308-13. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1446463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1446463

Halvorsen V, Fenstad A M, Engesaeter L B, Nordsletten L, Overgaard S, Pedersen A B, et al. Outcome of 881 total hip arthroplasties in 747 patients 21 years or younger: data from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) 1995–2016. Acta Orthop 2019; 90: 331-7. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1615263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1615263

Metcalfe D, Peterson N, Wilkinson J M, Perry D C. Temporal trends and survivorship of total hip arthroplasty in very young patients: a study using the National Joint Registry data set. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B: 1320-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B10.BJJ-2017-1441.R2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B10.BJJ-2017-1441.R2

Kuijpers M F L, Hannink G, Vehmeijer S B W, van Steenbergen L N, Schreurs B W. The risk of revision after total hip arthroplasty in young patients depends on surgical approach, femoral head size and bearing type; an analysis of 19,682 operations in the Dutch arthroplasty register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20: 385. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2765-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2765-z

Klug A, Gramlich Y, Hoffmann R, Pfeil J, Drees P, Kutzner K P. Trends in total hip arthroplasty in Germany from 2007 to 2016: what has changed and where are we now? Z Orthop Unfall 2021; 159: 173-80. doi: 10.1055/a-1028-7822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1028-7822

Grimberg A W, Steinbrück A. [10 years of the German Arthroplasty Registry-EPRD: what has been achieved?]. Die Orthopädie 2023, May 23 [Online]; 10.1007/s00132-023-04385-3. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04385-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-023-04385-3

Boyle M J, Frampton C M, Crawford H A. Early results of total hip arthroplasty in patients with slipped upper femoral epiphysis compared with patients with osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27(6): 1003-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.01.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.01.001

Engesaeter L B, Engesæter IØ, Fenstad AM, Havelin LI, Kärrholm J, Garellick G, et al. Low revision rate after total hip arthroplasty in patients with pediatric hip diseases. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(5): 436-41. doi: 10.5402/2012/437675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.736171

Wang J C, Liu K C, Gettleman B S, Chen M, Piple A S, Yang J, et al. Characteristics of very young patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a contemporary assessment. Arthroplast Today 2023; 25: 101268. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2023.101268

Hannouche D, Devriese F, Delambre J, Zadegan F, Tourabaly I, Sedel L, et al. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA implants in patients younger than 20 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474: 520-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4546-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4546-9

Roerink A M C, Nelissen R, Holder C, Graves S E, Dunbar M, Bohm E, et al. Sex-based differences in risk of revision for infection after hip, knee, shoulder, and ankle arthroplasty in osteoarthritis patients: a multinational registry study of 4,800,000 implants. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 730-6. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42183

Zijlstra W P, De Hartog B, Van Steenbergen L N, Scheurs B W, Nelissen R. Effect of femoral head size and surgical approach on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2017; 88: 395-401. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1317515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1317515

Grimberg A, Kirschner S, Lützner J, Melsheimer O, Morlock M, Steinbrück A. The German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) Annual Report 2024. Berlin: EPRD, 2024.

Published

2026-01-03

How to Cite

Elliott, J., Wu, Y., Steinbrück, A., & Grimberg, A. W. (2026). Survivorship and risk factors for revision after total hip arthroplasty in patients 30 years and younger: a cohort study from the German arthroplasty register. Acta Orthopaedica, 97, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.45042

Issue

Section

Publications

Categories