The association between laminar vs turbulent airflow and prosthetic hip joint infections: a prospective nationwide study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44356Keywords:
Arthroplasty, Hip, InfectionAbstract
Background and purpose: There is a controversy as to whether operating rooms with laminar airflow (LAF) ventilation are less associated with prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) than turbulent airflow (TAF) ventilation. We aimed to assess the association of LAF and TAF ventilation with PJI following primary THA.
Methods: This prospective cohort study, based on Danish administrative databases, included patients from all Danish hospitals. Patients with a primary THA with at least 365 days of follow-up between 2010 and 2020 were included from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (DHR). The patients were then linked to the Danish microbiology register. The primary outcome was revision due to PJI within 365 days after primary surgery, analyzed with multivariable Cox models and Gray’s test comparing LAF with TAF. PJI was defined by either a PJI diagnosis registered in the DHR after revision or 2 or more positive cultures with identical bacteria in the perioperative biopsies taken during revision.
Results: Of the 92,152 THAs (78,181 patients) included, 2,328 (2.5%) had revision surgery within 365 days. Of these, 843 (0.91%) were due to PJI (0.92% in LAF, 0.89% in TAF). After adjusting for patient- and surgery-related risk factors, and year of surgery, we found no difference in the PJI hazard between LAF and TAF (HR 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.78–1.26).
Conclusion: Our data indicate that there is no difference in the risk of PJI comparing LAF with TAF ventilation in primary THA in Denmark.
Downloads
References
Gundtoft P H, Pedersen A B, Varnum C, Overgaard S. Increased mortality after prosthetic joint infection in primary THA. Clin Orthop 2017; 475: 2623-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5289-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5289-6
Akindolire J, Morcos M W, Marsh J D, Howard J L, Lanting B A, Vasarhelyi E M. The economic impact of periprosthetic infection in total hip arthroplasty. Can J Surg 2020; 63: E52-6. doi: 10.1503/cjs.004219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.004219
Makela K T, Matilainen M, Pulkkinen P, Fenstad A M, Havelin L, Engesaeter L, et al. Failure rate of cemented and uncemented total hip replacements: register study of combined Nordic database of four nations. BMJ 2014; 348: f7592-f7592. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f7592
Bozic K J, Lau E, Kurtz S, Ong K, Rubash H, Vail T P, et al. Patient-related risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection and postoperative mortality following total hip arthroplasty in Medicare patients. J Bone Joint Surg 2012; 94: 794-800. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00072
Lidwell O M, Lowbury E J, Whyte W, Blowers R, Stanley S J, Lowe D. Effect of ultraclean air in operating rooms on deep sepsis in the joint after total hip or knee replacement: a randomised study. BMJ 1982; 285: 10-14. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6334.10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.285.6334.10
Knudsen R J, Knudsen S M N, Nymark T, Anstensrud T, Jensen E T, La Mia Malekzadeh M J, et al. Laminar airflow decreases microbial air contamination compared with turbulent ventilated operating theatres during live total joint arthroplasty: a nationwide survey. J Hosp Infect 2021; 113: 65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.04.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.04.019
Gundtoft P H, Overgaard S, Schønheyder H C, Møller J K, Kjærsgaard-Andersen P, Pedersen A B. The “true” incidence of surgically treated deep prosthetic joint infection after 32,896 primary total hip arthroplasties: a prospective cohort study. Acta Orthop 2015; 86: 326-34. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1011983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1011983
Bischoff P, Kubilay N Z, Allegranzi B, Egger M, Gastmeier P. Effect of laminar airflow ventilation on surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17: 553-61. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30059-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30059-2
Lindgren J V, Gordon M, Wretenberg P, Kärrholm J, Garellick G. Validation of reoperations due to infection in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15: 384. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-384
Sinagra Z P, Davis J S, Lorimer M, De Steiger R N, Graves S E, Yates P, et al. The accuracy of reporting of periprosthetic joint infection to the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Bone Jt Open 2022; 3: 367-74. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.35.BJO-2022-0011.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.35.BJO-2022-0011.R1
Gundtoft P H, Pedersen A B, Schønheyder H C, Overgaard S. Validation of the diagnosis ‘prosthetic joint infection’ in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Bone Jt J 2016; 98-B: 320-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B3.36705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B3.36705
Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (DHR), 2022 National Annual Report. n.d. web address: https://dshk.ortopaedi.dk/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/DHR-aarsrapport-2022.pdf
Gundtoft P, Varnum C, Pedersen A B, Overgaard S. The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Clin Epidemiol 2016; 8: 509-14. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S99498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S99498
Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sørensen H T. The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 2014; 29: 541-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3
Landspatientregisteret fra sundhedsdatastyrelsen. 2022. https://sundhedsdatastyrelsen.dk/data-og-registre/nationale-sundhedsregistre/landspatientregisteret
Statens Serum Institut. Hoftealloplastikinfektion 2023. https://miba.ssi.dk/overvaagningssystemer/haiba/casedefinitioner/hoftealloplastik
Pottegård A, Schmidt S A J, Wallach-Kildemoes H, Sørensen H T, Hallas J, Schmidt M. Data resource profile: the Danish National Prescription Registry. Int J Epidemiol 2016: dyw213. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw213
Baadsgaard M, Quitzau J. Danish registers on personal income and transfer payments. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39: 103-5. doi: 10.1177/1403494811405098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494811405098
Jensen V M, Rasmussen A W. Danish education registers. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39: 91-4. doi: 10.1177/1403494810394715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810394715
Muscatelli S, Zheng H, Muralidharan A, Tollemar V, Hallstrom B R. Limiting the surveillance period to 90 days misses a large portion of infections in the first year after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthroplasty Today 2022; 16: 90-5. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.04.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2022.04.009
McNally M, Sousa R, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Chen A F, Soriano A, Vogely H C, et al. Infographic: The EBJIS definition of periprosthetic joint infection: a practical guide for clinicians. Bone Jt J 2021; 103-B: 16-17. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-2417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-2417
Whyte W, Lytsy B. Ultraclean air systems and the claim that laminar airflow systems fail to prevent deep infections after total joint arthroplasty. J Hosp Infect 2019; 103: e9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.04.021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2019.04.021
Langvatn H, Schrama J C, Cao G, Hallan G, Furnes O, Lingaas E, et al. Operating room ventilation and the risk of revision due to infection after total hip arthroplasty: assessment of validated data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Hosp Infect 2020; 105: 216-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.010
Gundtoft P H, Pedersen A B, Schønheyder H C, Møller J K, Overgaard S. One-year incidence of prosthetic joint infection in total hip arthroplasty: a cohort study with linkage of the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register and Danish Microbiology Databases. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2017; 25: 685-93. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.12.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2016.12.010
Månsson E, Hellmark B, Sundqvist M, Söderquist B. Sequence types of Staphylococcus epidermidis associated with prosthetic joint infections are not present in the laminar airflow during prosthetic joint surgery. APMIS 2015; 123: 589-95. doi: 10.1111/apm.12392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12392
Skråmm I, Fossum Moen A E, Årøen A, Bukholm G. Surgical site infections in orthopaedic surgery demonstrate clones similar to those in orthopaedic Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriers. J Bone Joint Surg 2014; 96: 882-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00919
Levy P Y, Fenollar F, Stein A, Borrione F, Cohen E, Lebail B, et al. Propionibacterium acnes postoperative shoulder arthritis: an emerging clinical entity. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46: 1884-6. doi: 10.1086/588477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/588477
Dale H, Fenstad A M, Hallan G, Overgaard S, Pedersen A B, Hailer N P, et al. Increasing risk of revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty: results from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 307-15. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.13648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.13648
Statens Serum Institut. Det præ-, per- og postoperative område 2020. https://hygiejne.ssi.dk/NIRoperativ
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jacob Moflag Svensson, Anne Helms Andreasen, Espen Jimenez Solem, Søren Overgaard
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
