Double trouble! Concomitant distal ulna fractures predict worse 1-year outcome in distal radius fractures: a registry-based cohort study of 5,536 patients

Authors

  • Linnea Arvidsson Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Marcus Landgren Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand Surgery Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Gentofte, Denmark
  • Anna Kajsa Harding Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Antonio Abramo Department of Hand Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
  • Magnus Tägil Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Skåne University Hospital and Lund University, Lund, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-5591

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44352

Keywords:

DASH, Distal Radius Fracture, Distal Ulna Fracture, Fractures, Wrist

Abstract

Background and purpose: Data on distal radius fractures (DRFs) with concomitant metaphyseal distal ulna fractures is limited. We aimed to determine whether a combined DRF and distal ulna fracture (DRUF) predicts a worse patient-reported outcome, measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, 1 year after injury.
Methods: This prospective registry-based cohort study included 5,536 adult patients with a DRF between 2003 and 2018. The 1-year DASH scores were recorded. All DRUFs were identified. Multivariable binary logistic regression assessed whether the presence of a distal ulna fracture predicted a 1-year DASH score > 35, indicating severe upper-extremity symptoms.
Results: 259 of 5,536 patients (4.7%) had a DRUF. Their mean age was 73 years (SD 15), and 86% were women. The median 1-year DASH score was higher in the combined fracture group compared with those with a DRF only (23, interquartile range [IQR] 5–45] vs 9, IQR 2–27, P < 0.001). A DRUF increased the odds of a 1-year DASH > 35 by 97% (OR 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40–2.75, P < 0.001). Surgical fixation of the DRF in DRUF patients was associated with lower odds of a worse outcome (OR 0.44, CI 0.23–0.85, P = 0.02). Distal ulna fracture fixation did not affect 1-year DASH (P = 0.7).
Conclusion: The odds of having a DASH > 35, indicating severe symptoms, almost doubled at 1 year in patients with a DRUF compared with those with a DRF only.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Moloney M, Farnebo S, Adolfsson L. Incidence of distal ulna fractures in a Swedish county: 74/100,000 person-years, most of them treated non-operatively. Acta Orthop 2020; 91(1): 104-8. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1686570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1686570

Abdel Khalik H, Lameire D L, Kruse C, Hache P J, Al-Asiri J. Management of very distal ulna fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Trauma 2023; 37(7): e274-e81. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002584

Biyani A, Simison A J, Klenerman L. Fractures of the distal radius and ulna. J Hand Surg Br 1995; 20(3): 357-64. doi: 10.1016/S0266-7681(05)80094-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-7681(05)80094-4

Herzberg G, Castel T. [Incidence of distal ulna fractures associated with distal radius fractures: treatment options]. Hand Surg Rehabil 2016; 35S: S69-S74. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2016.09.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2016.09.005

Paksima N, Khurana S, Soojian M, Patel V, Egol K. Fracture of the Distal ulna metaphysis in the setting of distal radius fractures. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2017; 75(2): 104-8.

Ruchelsman D E, Raskin K B, Rettig M E. Outcome following acute primary distal ulna resection for comminuted distal ulna fractures at the time of operative fixation of unstable fractures of the distal radius. Hand (N Y) 2009; 4(4): 391-6. doi: 10.1007/s11552-009-9175-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-009-9175-x

Ozkan S, Fischerauer S F, Kootstra T J M, Claessen F, Ring D. Ulnar neck fractures associated with distal radius fractures. J Wrist Surg 2018; 7(1): 71-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1605382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1605382

Glogovac G, Perry A K, Wigton M D, Stern P J. Treatment modality of distal ulnar head and neck fractures associated with operatively treated distal radius fractures does not affect outcomes. Hand (N Y) 2022; 17(3): 512-18. doi: 10.1177/1558944720922923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944720922923

van Rossenberg L X, van de Wall B, Diwersi N, Scheuble L, Beeres F, van Heijl M, et al. Surgical fixation of distal ulna neck and head fractures. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2023; 35(6): 329-40. 10.1007/s00064-023-00835-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-023-00835-5

Dennison D G. Open reduction and internal locked fixation of unstable distal ulna fractures with concomitant distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32(6): 801-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.03.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.03.010

Gauthier M, Beaulieu J Y, Nichols L, Hannouche D. Ulna hook plate osteosynthesis for ulna head fracture associated with distal radius fracture. J Orthop Traumatol 2022; 23(1): 39. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00658-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00658-3

Cha S M, Shin H D, Kim K C, Park E. Treatment of unstable distal ulna fractures associated with distal radius fractures in patients 65 years and older. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37(12): 2481-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.07.031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.07.031

Liang B, Lai J M, Murugan A, Chee K G, Sechachalam S, Foo T L. Proposed guidelines for treatment of concomitant distal radius and distal ulna fractures. Hand Surg 2015; 20(3): 396-401. doi: 10.1142/S0218810415500306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218810415500306

Sato K, Murakami K, Mimata Y, Numata N, Shiraishi H, Doita M. Conservative treatment of distal ulna metaphyseal fractures associated with distal radius fractures in elderly people. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2018; 104(7): 1101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.07.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.07.020

Lutsky K F, Lucenti L, Beredjiklian P K. Outcomes of distal ulna fractures associated with operatively treated distal radius fractures. Hand (N Y) 2020; 15(3): 418-21. doi: 10.1177/1558944718812134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944718812134

Niemann M J, Lese A B, Sraj S, Taras J S. Distal ulna fracture fixation with the specialized threaded pin. J Hand Surg Glob Online 2023; 5(4): 426-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.03.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.03.012

Landgren M, Abramo A, Geijer M, Kopylov P, Tägil M. Similar 1-year subjective outcome after a distal radius fracture during the 10-year-period 2003–2012. Acta Orthop 2017; 88(4): 451-6. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1303601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1303601

Abramo A, Kopylov P, Tägil M. Evaluation of a treatment protocol in distal radius fractures: a prospective study in 581 patients using DASH as outcome. Acta Orthop 2008; 79(3): 376-85. doi: 10.1080/17453670710015283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710015283

Gummesson C, Ward M M, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-44

Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Andersson B, Dahlgren E, Johansson A. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71(6): 613-18. doi: 10.1080/000164700317362262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/000164700317362262

Charlson M E, Pompei P, Ales K L, MacKenzie C R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40(5): 373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8

Müller M E, Nazarian S, oKch P, Schatzker J. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61261-9

Moloney M, Karedal J, Persson T, Farnebo S, Adolfsson L. Poor reliability and reproducibility of 3 different radiographical classification systems for distal ulna fractures. Acta Orthop 2022; 93: 438-43. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.2509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.2509

Lindström L. Nationellt vårdprogram för behandling av distala radiusfrakturer. Nationellt system för kunskapsstyrning. Hälso- och sjukvård. Sveriges regioner i samverkan; 2021: 1-140.

Published

2025-08-15

How to Cite

Arvidsson, L., Landgren, M., Harding, A. K., Abramo, A., & Tägil, M. (2025). Double trouble! Concomitant distal ulna fractures predict worse 1-year outcome in distal radius fractures: a registry-based cohort study of 5,536 patients. Acta Orthopaedica, 96, 606–611. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44352

PlumX (by Elsevier) is an altmetrics platform that tracks and visualizes the online attention, usage, captures, citations, and social media engagement.