Mechanical axial instability of segmental pedicle screw instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective cohort study of tulip screw versus dual locking cup instrumentation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44038Keywords:
Paediatric orthopaedics, SpineAbstract
Background and purpose: The effects of axial instability in the rod–screw interface resulting in axial slippage between screws and rods are largely unknown. We aimed to assess the incidence of axial slip and loss of correction by comparing tulip screw versus dual locking cup in spinal instrumentations of patients treated with posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We also aimed to assess whether axial slip would affect health-related quality of life.
Methods: This study consists of 194 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion for AIS during 2012–2022. All patients had a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. There were 98 patients treated with segmental tulip pedicle screw instrumentation and 96 patients with segmental dual locking cup constructs. Axial slip was defined as ≥ 2 mm and was assessed by measuring the rod exceeding the last pedicle screw and the distance between the 2 lowest screws on the same rod. Loss of correction was assessed by comparing postoperative and 2-year radiographic measurements. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the SRS-24 questionnaire.
Results: Axial slip occurred only between the lowest instrumented vertebra and the vertebra above it on the convex side of the deformity. At 2 years of follow-up, axial slippage of 2 mm or more was observed more often in the dual locking group, which was observed in 24 (25%) patients in the dual locking cup group and 11 (11%) patients in the tulip group (risk ratio [RR] 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–4.4). Minimum of 10° loss of major curve correction was found in 1 (1%) patient in the tulip group and 9 (9%) patients in the dual locking group (RR 9.1, CI 1.2–100).
Conclusion: Axial slip was significantly less frequent in the tulip group than in the dual locking cup group. This suggests that tulip screw instrumentation may offer superior mechanical stability in posterior spinal fusion for AIS. Axial slip was not associated with health-related quality of life outcomes.
Downloads
References
Cobb J R. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instr Course Lect AAOS. 1948; 5:261-275.
Weinstein S L, Dolan L A, Cheng J C Y, Danielsson A, Morcuende J A. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 2008; 371(9623): 1527-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3
Crawford A H, Lykissas M G, Gao X, Eismann E, Anadio J. All-pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a comparative radiographical study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine 2013; 38(14): 1199-1208. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828ce597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828ce597
Gehrchen M, Ohrt-Nissen S, Hallager D W, Dahl B. A uniquely shaped rod improves curve correction in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2016; 41(14): 1139-45. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001504
Lastikka M, Oksanen H, Helenius L, Pajulo O, Helenius I. Comparison of circular and sagittal reinforced rod options on sagittal balance restoration in adolescents undergoing pedicle screw instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. World Neurosurg 2019; 127: e1020-e1025. doi: 10.1016/J.WNEU.2019.04.028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.028
Upasani V V, Hedequist D J, Hresko M T, Karlin L I, Emans J B, Glotzbecker M P. Spinal deformity progression after posterior segmental instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 2015; 9(1): 29-37. doi: 10.1007/s11832-015-0632-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-015-0632-5
Hwang S W, Samdani A F, Stanton P, Marks M C, Bastrom T, Newton P O, et al. Impact of pedicle screw fixation on loss of deformity correction in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Ped Orthop 2013; 33(4): 377-82. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31828800e9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e31828800e9
Sponseller P D, Jain A, Newton P O, Lonner B S, Shah S A, Shufflebarger H, et al. Posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screws in patients with idiopathic scoliosis and open triradiate cartilage: does deformity progression occur? J Ped Orthop 2016; 36(7): 695-700. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000524
Potter B K, Kirk K L, Shah S A, Kuklo T R. Loss of coronal correction following instrumentation removal in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006; 31(1): 67-72. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000192721.51511.fe. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000192721.51511.fe
Schlösser T P, Blaauw I, van der Valk M R, van Solinge G, Faber C, Kruyt M C. Axial rod slip at the end-of-construct screw in scoliosis surgery: relevance, occurrence and prevention. Spine Deform 2024; 12(6): 1699-1707. doi: 10.1007/s43390-024-00925-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00925-9
Larson A N, Polly D W, Sponseller P D, Kelly M P, Richards B S, Garg S, et al. The effect of implant density on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis fusion: results of the Minimize Implants Maximize Outcomes randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg 2024; 106(3): 180-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.00178
Saarinen A J, Suominen E N, Helenius L, Syvänen J, Raitio A, Helenius I. Intraoperative 3D imaging reduces pedicle screw related complications and reoperations in adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective study. Children 2022; 9(8): 1129. doi: 10.3390/children9081129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children9081129
Lenke L G, Betz R R, Harms J, Bridwell K H, Clements D H, Lowe T G, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 2001; 83(8): 1169-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200108000-00006
Beauchamp E C, Lenke L G, Cerpa M, Newton P O, Kelly M P, Blanke K M, et al. Selecting the “touched vertebra” as the lowest instrumented vertebra in patients with Lenke Type-1 and 2 curves: radiographic results after a minimum 5-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 2020; 102(22): 1966-73. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01485
O’Brien M F, Kuklo T R, Blanke K M, Lenke L G. Radiographic measurement manual. Spinal Deformity Study Group (SDSG). Medtronic Sofamor Danek. Published online 2004.
Haher T R, Gorup J M, Shin T M, Homel P, Merola A A, Grogan D P, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine 1999; 24: 1435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199907150-00008
Landis J R, Koch G G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33(1): 159-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Samdani A F, Bennett J T, Singla A R, Marks M C, Pahys J M, Lonner B S, et al. Do ponte osteotomies enhance correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? An analysis of 191 Lenke 1A and 1B curves. Spine Deform 2015; 3(5): 483-8. doi: 10.1016/J.JSPD.2015.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.03.002
Marks M, Petcharaporn M, Betz R R, Clements D, Lenke L, Newton P O. Outcomes of surgical treatment in male versus female adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Spine 2007; 32(5): 544-9. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000256908.51822.6E. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000256908.51822.6e
Ohrt-Nissen S, Dahl B, Gehrchen M. Choice of rods in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: what are the clinical implications of biomechanical properties? A review of the literature. Neurospine 2018; 15(2): 123. doi: 10.14245/ns.1836050.025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.1836050.025
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aron Frantzén, Antti Saarinen, Eetu Suominen, Matti Ahonen, Ilkka Helenius
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
