Evaluation of sonication for the detection of periprosthetic joint infection in hip revision arthroplasty: a retrospective observational single-center study of 288 episodes

Authors

  • Bernhardt Kickinger Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Sweden
  • Tor Monsen Department of Clinical Microbiology, Umeå University, Sweden
  • Emma Karis Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Sweden
  • Micael Widerström Department of Clinical Microbiology, Umeå University, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1483-4255
  • Petter Sundin Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Sweden
  • Kjell G Nilsson Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8818-3408
  • Volker Otten Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9966-1903
  • Sead Crnalic Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43679

Keywords:

Arthroplasty, Hip, Hip revision arthroplasty, Infection, Microbiological diagnostics, Sonication

Abstract

Background and purpose: Sonication fluid cultures have been proposed as a complementary diagnostic method to intraoperative tissue culture sampling for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We evaluated whether sonication provides additional clinically relevant information in the diagnosis of PJI in hip revision.
Methods: Episodes of hip revision performed between January 2007 and December 2016 were assigned retrospectively to the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) definition of periprosthetic joint infection: infection unlikely, infection likely, and infection confirmed. The inclusion criteria were a minimum of 2 perioperative tissue cultures collected at the index procedure and sonication performed on a removed implant. The results of the tissue cultures were compared with the results of the implant sonication fluid cultures (SFCs).
Results: 288 hip revision episodes in 250 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The “infection unlikely” group included 203 episodes (178 patients), the “infection likely” group included 5 episodes (5 patients), and the “infection confirmed” group included 80 episodes (67 patients). SFC delivered additional clinical information in 15/288: 6 of 203 episodes in the “infection unlikely” group, 2 of 5 episodes in the “infection likely” group, and 7 of 80 in the “infection confirmed” group. Coagulase-negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus were the dominant bacterial species in both the SFC and tissue cultures.
Conclusion: In addition to tissue cultures, sonication fluid cultures optimized the microbiological yield in 15 out of 288 hip revision episodes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Parvizi J, Tan T L, Goswami K, Higuera C, Della Valle C, Chen A F, et al. The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33: 1309-1314 e1302. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078

Sousa R, Ribau A, Alfaro P, Burch M-A, Ploegmakers J, McNally M, et al. The European Bone and Joint Infection Society definition of periprosthetic joint infection is meaningful in clinical practice: a multicentric validation study with comparison with previous definitions. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 8-18. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.5670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.5670

Deirmengian C, Kardos K, Kilmartin P, Cameron A, Schiller K, Parvizi J. Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: has the era of the biomarker arrived? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 3254-62. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3543-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3543-8

Xie K, Qu X, Yan M. Procalcitonin and alpha-defensin for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 1387-94. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.001

Dudareva M, Barrett L, Figtree M, Scarborough M, Watanabe M, Newnham R, et al. Sonication versus tissue sampling for diagnosis of prosthetic joint and other orthopedic device-related infections. J Clin Microbiol 2018; 56. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00688-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00688-18

Trampuz A, Piper K E, Jacobson M J, Hanssen A D, Unni K K, Osmon D R, et al. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 654-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa061588

Atkins BL, Athanasou N, Deeks J J, Crook D W, Simpson H, Peto T E, et al. Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty: the OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36: 2932-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.10.2932-2939.1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.36.10.2932-2939.1998

Janz V, Wassilew G I, Hasart O, Tohtz S, Perka C. Improvement in the detection rate of PJI in total hip arthroplasty through multiple sonicate fluid cultures. J Orthop Res 2013; 31: 2021–2024. doi: 10.1002/jor.22451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22451

Donlan R M. New approaches for the characterization of prosthetic joint biofilms. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 437: 12-19. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000175120.66051.29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000175120.66051.29

Fernandez-Sampedro M, Farinas-Alvarez C, Garces-Zarzalejo C, Alonso-Aguirre M A, Salas-Venero C, Martinez-Martinez L, et al. Accuracy of different diagnostic tests for early, delayed and late prosthetic joint infection. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17: 592. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2693-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2693-1

Hughes H C, Newnham R, Athanasou N, Atkins B L, Bejon P, Bowler I C J W. Microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a prospective evaluation of four bacterial culture media in the routine laboratory. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011; 17: 1528-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03597.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03597.x

Minassian A M, Newnham R, Kalimeris E, Bejon P, Atkins B L, Bowler I C J W. Use of an automated blood culture system (BD BACTEC™) for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: easy and fast. BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14: 233. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-233

Monsen T, Lövgren E, Widerström M, Wallinder L. In vitro effect of ultrasound on bacteria and suggested protocol for sonication and diagnosis of prosthetic infections. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47: 2496-501. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02316-08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02316-08

Hoekstra M, Veltman E S, Nurmohamed R, van Dijk B, Rentenaar R J, Vogely H C, et al. Sonication leads to clinically relevant changes in treatment of periprosthetic hip or knee joint infection. J Bone Jt Infect 2020; 5: 128-32. doi: 10.7150/jbji.45006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.45006

Dudek P, Grajek A, Kowalczewski J, Madycki G, Marczak D. Ultrasound frequency of sonication applied in microbiological diagnostics has a major impact on viability of bacteria causing PJI. Int J Infect Dis 2020; 100: 158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.038

McNally M, Sousa R, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Chen A F, Soriano A, Vogely H C, et al. The EBJIS definition of periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B: 18-25. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-1381.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-1381.R1

Namdari S, Nicholson T, Abboud J, Lazarus M, Ramsey M L, Williams G, et al. Comparative study of cultures and next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of shoulder prosthetic joint infections. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28: 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.048

Hoch A, Fritz Y, Dimitriou D, Bossard D A, Fucentese S F, Wieser K, et al. Treatment outcomes of patients with Cutibacterium acnes-positive cultures during total joint replacement revision surgery: a minimum 2-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 10.1007/s00402-022-04489-z. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04489-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04489-z

Van Diek F M, Albers C G M, Van Hooff M L, Meis J F, Goosen J H M. Low sensitivity of implant sonication when screening for infection in revision surgery. Acta Orthop 2017; 88: 294-9. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1300021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1300021

Gomez E, Cazanave C, Cunningham S A, Greenwood-Quaintance K E, Steckelberg J M, Uhl J R, et al. Prosthetic joint infection diagnosis using broad-range PCR of biofilms dislodged from knee and hip arthroplasty surfaces using sonication. J Clin Microbiol 2012; 50: 3501-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00834-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00834-12

Rothenberg A C, Wilson A E, Hayes J P, O’Malley M J, Klatt B A. Sonication of arthroplasty implants improves accuracy of periprosthetic joint infection cultures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475: 1827-36. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5315-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5315-8

Puig-Verdie L, Alentorn-Geli E, Gonzalez-Cuevas A, Sorli L, Salvado M, Alier A, et al. Implant sonication increases the diagnostic accuracy of infection in patients with delayed, but not early, orthopaedic implant failure. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B: 244-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30486

Achermann Y, Goldstein E J, Coenye T, Shirtliff M E. Propionibacterium acnes: from commensal to opportunistic biofilm-associated implant pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 2014; 27: 419-40. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00092-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00092-13

Boisrenoult P. Cutibacterium acnes prosthetic joint infection: diagnosis and treatment. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2018; 104: S19-S24. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.05.030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.05.030

O’Neil C R, Wilson E, Missaghi B. Bone and joint infections due to haemophilus parainfluenzae: case report and review of the literature. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2016; 2016: 4503025. doi: 10.1155/2016/4503025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4503025

Grosso M J, Frangiamore S J, Yakubek G, Bauer T W, Iannotti JP, Ricchetti E T. Performance of implant sonication culture for the diagnosis of periprosthetic shoulder infection. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27: 211-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.08.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.08.008

Published

2025-06-09

How to Cite

Kickinger, B., Monsen, T., Karis, E., Widerström, M., Sundin, P., Nilsson, K. G., … Crnalic, S. (2025). Evaluation of sonication for the detection of periprosthetic joint infection in hip revision arthroplasty: a retrospective observational single-center study of 288 episodes. Acta Orthopaedica, 96, 429–436. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43679

Issue

Section

Publications

Categories