Association of socioeconomic inequality and risk of periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty: a Danish cohort study of 75,141 cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43678Keywords:
Arthroplasty, Epidemiology, Infection, Knee, Periprosthetic Joint InfectionAbstract
Background and purpose: Awareness of socioeconomic disparities in outcomes following surgical procedures is increasing. This highlights a critical challenge for clinical practice and public health. We examined whether low socioeconomic position (SEP) was associated with the incidence of revisions due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Methods: This cohort study included 75,141 patients undergoing TKA (2010–2021), identified from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry (DKR). Individual-level SEP information, including wealth, living arrangements, and education, was obtained from Danish social and administrative registries. Revisions due to PJI were identified using a method combining the DKR and microbiology data. We calculated the cumulative incidence of revision due to PJI at 90 days and 2 years, and 2-year hazard ratios (aHRs) of revision due to PJI for lower vs. higher SEP groups, adjusted for age, sex, weight, and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: The incidence of revision due to PJI after 2 years of follow-up was 1.5% (CI 1.3–1.6) for low-wealth patients vs. 1.2% (CI 1.1–1.3) for high-wealth patients (aHR 1.3, CI 1.1–1.5); 1.5% (CI 1.3–1.7) for patients living alone vs. 1.2% (CI 1.1–1.3) for those cohabiting (aHR 1.4, CI 1.2–1.6); and 1.3% (CI 1.1–1.4) for patients with low education vs. 1.2% (CI 1.0–1.4) for those with high education (aHR 1.0, CI 0.8–1.2).
Conclusion: Revision due to PJI among low-wealth patients and those living alone versus the corresponding high-SEP group were associated with increased risk of revision due to PJI.
Downloads
References
Lum Z C, Natsuhara K M, Shelton T J, Giordani M, Pereira G C, Meehan J P. Mortality during total knee periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33(12): 3783-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.021
Boddapati V, Fu M C, Mayman D J, Su E P, Sculco P K, McLawhorn A S. Revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality relative to noninfectious revisions. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33: 521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.021
Galobardes B. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60: 7-12. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.023531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023531
Lenguerrand E, Whitehouse M R, Beswick A D, Kunutsor S K, Foguet P, Porter M, et al. Risk factors associated with revision for prosthetic joint infection following knee replacement: an observational cohort study from England and Wales. Lancet Infect Dis 2019; 19: 589-600. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30755-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30755-2
Anneberg M, Troelsen A, Gundtoft P, Sørensen H T, Pedersen A B. Temporal trends in revision rate due to knee periprosthetic joint infection: a study of 115,120 cases from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 616-24. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.33294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.33294
MAC. McMaster Arthroplasty Collaborative: Incidence and predictors of prosthetic joint infection following primary total knee arthroplasty: a 15-year population-based cohort study. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37: 367-72 e361. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.006
Mackenbach J P. Health inequalities: persistence and change in European welfare states. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198831419.001.0001
Dekeyser G J, Anderson M B, Meeks H D, Pelt C E, Peters C L, Gililland J M. Socioeconomic status may not be a risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35: 1900-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.058
Kamath C C, O’Byrne T J, Lewallen D G, Berry D J, Maradit Kremers H. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic deprivation, rurality, and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty: analysis from a large, tertiary care hospital. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2022; 6: 337-46. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.06.001
Edwards N M, Varnum C, Nelissen R G H H, Overgaard S, Pedersen A B. The association between socioeconomic status and the 30- and 90-day risk of infection after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B: 221-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b2.bjj-2021-1030.r1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.104B2.BJJ-2021-1030.R1
Barrack R L, Ruh E L, Chen J, Lombardi A V, Berend K R, Parvizi J, et al. Impact of socioeconomic factors on outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 86-97. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3002-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3002-y
Schmidt M, Schmidt S A J, Adelborg K, Sundboll J, Laugesen K, Ehrenstein V, et al. The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: from health care contacts to database records. Clin Epidemiol 2019; 11: 563-91. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S179083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S179083
Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sørensen H T. The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 2014; 29: 541-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3
Jensen V M, Rasmussen A W. Danish Education Registers. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39: 91-4. doi: 10.1177/1403494810394715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810394715
Pedersen A, Mehnert, Odgaard A, Schrøder H M. Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Clin Epidemiol 2012; 4: 125-35. doi: 10.2147/clep.s30050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S30050
Schmidt M, Schmidt S A, Sandegaard J L, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sorensen H T. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol 2015; 7: 449-90. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S91125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S91125
Voldstedlund M, Haarh M, Mølbak K, the Miba Board Of Representatives C. The Danish Microbiology Database (MiBa) 2010 to 2013. Euro Surveill 2014; 19: 20667. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.es2014.19.1.20667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.1.20667
Anneberg M, Kristiansen E B, Troelsen A, Gundtoft P, Sørensen H T, Pedersen A B. Enhancing the data capture of periprosthetic joint infections in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry: validity assessment and incidence estimation. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 166-73. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40358
Klenø A N, Stisen M B, Edwards N M, Mechlenburg I, Pedersen A B. Socioeconomic status and use of analgesic drugs before and after primary hip arthroplasty: a population-based cohort study of 103,209 patients during 1996–2018. Acta Orthop 2022; 93: 171-8. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2021.955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2021.955
Edwards N M, Varnum C, Overgaard S, Pedersen A B. Impact of socioeconomic status on the 90- and 365-day rate of revision and mortality after primary total hip arthroplasty: a cohort study based on 103,901 patients with osteoarthritis from national databases in Denmark. Acta Orthop 2021; 92: 581-8. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1935487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1935487
Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen A F. Proceedings of the International Consensus on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B: 1450-2. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b11.33135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.33135
Sayers A, Evans J T, Whitehouse M R, Blom A W. Are competing risks models appropriate to describe implant failure? Acta Orthop 2018; 89: 256-8. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1444876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1444876
von Elm E, Altman D G, Egger M, Pocock S J, Gotzsche P C, Vandenbroucke J P, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology 2007; 18: 800-4. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577654
Tønnesen H. Alcohol abuse and postoperative morbidity. Dan Med Bull 2003; 50: 139-60. PMID: 12812138.
Wylde V, Kunutsor S K, Lenguerrand E, Jackson J, Blom A W, Beswick A D. Is social support associated with patient-reported outcomes after joint replacement? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Rheumatol 2019; 1: e174-e186. doi: 10.1016/s2665-9913(19)30050-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30050-5
Pinkhasov R M, Wong J, Kashanian J, Lee M, Samadi D B, Pinkhasov M M, et al. Are men shortchanged on health? Perspective on health care utilization and health risk behavior in men and women in the United States. Int J Clin Pract 2010; 64: 475-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02290.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02290.x
Petrovic D, de Mestral C, Bochud M, Bartley M, Kivimäki M, Vineis P, et al. The contribution of health behaviors to socioeconomic inequalities in health: a systematic review. Prev Med 2018; 113: 15-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.05.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.05.003
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marie Anneberg, Anders Troelsen, Per Gundtoft, Alma B Pedersen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
