Ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulna impaction syndrome with positive ulnar variance: retrospective outcome analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43086Keywords:
Positive ulnar variance, Ulna shortening osteotomy, Ulnar impaction syndromeAbstract
Background and purpose: We primarily aimed to report the results of ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) in cases of ulna impaction syndrome (UIS), and secondarily to assess the influence of etiology, radiographic parameters, and comorbidities on the outcome.
Methods: Patients with USO performed for UIS between 2014 and 2022 at our department were included in the study. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative data, including complications and revisions, were recorded retrospectively. An additional study-specific follow-up was performed in all available cases, including subjective outcome measures as Patient Related Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and Quick Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (Quick-DASH) scores, and standardized 90–90° wrist radiographs.
Results: 47 patients were treated with USO at mean age 45.8 years (standard deviation [SD] 16.7); 28 were female; median follow-up was 37 months (interquartile range [IQR] 22–57). Isolated USO was performed in 27 cases; the rest received a combination of procedures, e.g., wrist arthroscopy. USO-specific devices were used in all cases. Reoperations were performed in 12 cases, with implant removal in 11. Postoperative complications such as chronic regional pain syndrome or pseudoarthrosis were detected in 9 patients. 29 patients were additionally examined at median 36 months (IQR 22–49) follow-up. A median PRWE score of 7 (IQR 0–19) and a median Quick-DASH score of 4.5 (IQR 0–15.9) were reported. The subjective improvement was rated as very high by 24 patients. Radiographs showed a mean ulnar shortening of 2.9 mm (SD 1.1) and bone consolidation was achieved in all osteotomies at last follow-up. Relevant comorbidities weakly correlated with worse outcome scores (ρ = 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] –0.05 to 0.74 for PRWE and ρ = 0.40, CI –0.06 to 0.73 for Quick-DASH). No statistically significant difference could be detected in any other variables, including UIS etiology.
Conclusion: We found that USO had good subjective results measure scores, but with relatively high complication and revision rates, including implant removal.
Downloads
References
Tomiano M M, Elfer J. Ulnar impaction syndrome. Hand Clinics 2005; 21: 567-75. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2005.08.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2005.08.011
Sammer D M, Rizzo D. Ulnar impaction. Hand Clinics 2010; 26(4): 549-57. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2010.05.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2010.05.011
Jarrett C D, Baratz M E. The management of ulnocarpal abutment and degenerative triangular fibrocartilage complex tears in the competitive athlete. Hand Clinics 2012; 28: 329-37. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2012.05.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2012.05.018
Bernstein M A, Nagle D J, Martinez A, Stogin J M Jr, Wiedrich T A. A comparison of combined arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex debridement and arthroscopic wafer distal ulna resection versus arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex debridement and ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnocarpal abutment syndrome. Arthroscopy 2004; 20(4): 392-401. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.013
Palmer A K, Werner F W. Biomechanics of the distal radioulnar joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; (187): 26-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198407000-00005
Tomaino M M. Ulnar impaction syndrome in the ulnar negative and neutral wrist. Br J Hand Surg 1998; 23(6): 754-757. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(98)80090-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-7681(98)80090-9
Cerezal L, del Pinal F, Abascal F. MR imaging findings in ulnar-sided wrist impaction syndromes. Magn Reso Imaging Clin N Am 2004; 12: 281-99. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2004.02.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2004.02.005
Sachar K. Ulnar-sided wrist pain: evaluation and treatment of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears, ulnocarpal impaction syndrome, and lunotriquetral ligament tears. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37(7): 1489-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.04.036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.04.036
Barbaric K, Rujevcan G, Labas M, Delimar D, Bicanic G. Ulnar shortening osteotomy after distal radius fracture malunion: review of literature. Open Orthop J 2015 5; 9: 98-106. doi: 10.2174/1874325001509010098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001509010098
Stockton D J, Pelletier M E, Pike J M. Operative treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015; 40(5): 470-6. doi: 10.1177/1753193414541749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193414541749
Constantine K J, Tomaino M M, Herndon J H, Sotereanos D G. Comparison of ulnar shortening osteotomy and the wafer resection procedure as treatment for ulnar impaction syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25(1): 55-60. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu025a0055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu025a0055
Hassan S, Shafafy R, Mohan A, Magnussen P. Solitary ulnar shortening osteotomy for malunion of distal radius fractures: experience of a centre in the UK and review of the literature. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2019; 101(3): 203-7. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2018.0211
Isaacs J, Howard S B, Gulkin D. A prospective study on the initial results of a low profile ulna shortening osteotomy system. Hand (N Y) 2010; 5(2): 148-54. doi: 10.1007/s11552-009-9226-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-009-9226-3
Schmidle G, Kastenberger T, Arora R. Time-dependent recovery of outcome parameters in ulnar shortening for positive ulnar variance: a prospective case series. Hand (N Y) 2018 Mar; 13(2): 215-22. doi: 10.1177/1558944717702465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944717702465
Srinivasan R C, Jain D, Richard M J, Leversedge F J, Mithani S K, Ruch D S. Isolated ulnar shortening osteotomy for the treatment of extra-articular distal radius malunion. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38(6): 1106-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.03.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.03.015
Teunissen J S, Wouters R M, Al Shaer S, Zöphel O T, Vermeulen G M, Hovius S E R, et al. Outcomes of ulna shortening osteotomy: a cohort analysis of 106 patients. J Orthop Traumatol 2022; 23(1): 1. doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00621-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00621-8
Chan S K, Singh T, Pinder R, Tan S, Craigen M A. Ulnar shortening osteotomy: are complications under reported? J Hand Microsurg 2015; 7(2): 276-82. doi: 10.1007/s12593-015-0201-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12593-015-0201-7
Darlis N A, Ferraz I C, Kaufmann R W, Sotereanos D G. Step-cut distal ulnar-shortening osteotomy. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30(5): 943-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.05.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.05.010
Teunissen J S, Feitz R, Al Shaer S, Hovius S, Selles R W; Hand-Wrist Study Group, et al. Return to usual work following an ulnar shortening osteotomy: a sample of 111 patients. J Hand Surg Am 2022; 47(8): 794.e1-794.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.07.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934221089228
Tang J B, Giddins G. Why and how to report surgeons’ levels of expertise. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41(4): 365-6. doi: 10.1177/1753193416641590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193416641590
Christensen R, Ranstam J, Overgaard S, Wagner P. Guidelines for a structured manuscript: statistical methods and reporting in biomedical research journals. Acta Orthopaedica 2023; 94: 243-9. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.11656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.11656
Tatebe M, Shinohara T, Okui N, Yamamoto M, Imaeda T, Hirata H. Results of ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnocarpal abutment after malunited distal radius fracture. Acta Orthop Belg 2012; 78(6): 714-18. PMID: 23409565
Tomaino M M. The importance of the pronated grip x-ray view in evaluating ulnar variance. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25(2): 352-7. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu25a0352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu25a0352
Gogna P, Gaba S, Mukhopadhyay R, Rohilla R, Singh A. Neglected epiphyseal injuries of the distal end of the radius with ulnar impaction: analysis of distal osteotomy of both bones using a dorsal midline approach. J Orthop Traumatol 2017; 18(1): 31-6. doi: 10.1007/s10195-016-0423-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-016-0423-x
Yu H, Wang T, Wang Y, Zhu Y. Ulnar shortening osteotomy vs. wafer resection for ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2022; 104: 106725. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106725
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marisa Valentini, Eva Kalcher, Silvia Zötsch, Andreas Leithner, Philipp Lanz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
