Incidence, treatment, and mortality of ankle fractures: a Danish population-based cohort study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43006Keywords:
Ankle fracture, Foot and ankle, Fractures, Incidence, Malleollus fracture, Mortality, PopulationAbstract
Background and purpose: Previous studies have shown large variation in the incidence of ankle fractures. Nationwide data covering longer periods is necessary to gain knowledge of the current trends. The aim of this study was to describe the trends in incidence, treatment, and mortality of ankle fracture during a 20-year period.
Methods: Ankle fractures in patients ≥ 18 years old were identified in the Danish National Patient Register using the validated diagnosis and surgical procedure codes for ankle fractures. Incidence rates per 100,000 and incidence rate ratio (IRR) are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: We identified 155,740 ankle fractures. The overall mean incidence rate during the period 1997–2018 was 164 (CI 163–165) per 100,000 person-years, being 154 (CI 152–155) for men and 203 (CI 202–205) for women. The incidence rate increased from 155 (CI 131–179) during 1997–2006 to 173 (CI 147–199) during 2007–2018, corresponding to an IRR of 1.12 (CI 1.10–1.12). This increase was primarily driven by an increase in women, with an IRR of 1.21 (CI 1.20–1.23) and for patients above 50 years, with an IRR of 1.22 (CI 1.08–1.10).
The proportion of patients surgically treated increased from 21% in 1997–2006 to 25% in 2007–2018. The 1-year mortality risk was higher for patients above 65 years with an ankle fracture compared with the general population of the same age, with an IRR of 1.47 (CI 1.42–1.53).
Conclusion: The incidence of ankle fracture increased from 1997 to 2018, primarily due to an increased incidence in women and in the elderly population. The proportion of surgically treated patients increased from 21% to 26%. Excess mortality after ankle fracture in patients above 65 years was observed.
Downloads
References
Court-Brown C M. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. vol 8. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2015.
Bergh C, Wennergren D, Möller M, Brisby H. Fracture incidence in adults in relation to age and gender: a study of 27,169 fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register in a well-defined catchment area. PLoS One 2020; 15(12): e0244291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244291
Ponkilainen V, Kuitunen I, Liukkonen R, Vaajala M, Reito A, Uimonen M. The incidence of musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint Res 2022; 11(11): 814-25. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.1111.BJR-2022-0181.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.1111.BJR-2022-0181.R1
Court-Brown C M, McBirnie J, Wilson G. Adult ankle fractures—an increasing problem? Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69(1): 43-7. doi: 10.3109/17453679809002355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679809002355
Jensen S L, Andresen B K, Mencke S, Nielsen P T. Epidemiology of ankle fractures: a prospective population-based study of 212 cases in Aalborg, Denmark. Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69(1): 48-50. doi: 10.3109/17453679809002356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679809002356
Thur C K, Edgren G, Jansson K-Å, Wretenberg P. Epidemiology of adult ankle fractures in Sweden between 1987 and 2004: a population-based study of 91,410 Swedish inpatients. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(3): 276-81. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.672091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.672091
Liu S, Zhu Y, Chen W, Wang L, Zhang X, Zhang Y. Demographic and socioeconomic factors influencing the incidence of ankle fractures, a national population-based survey of 512187 individuals. Sci Rep 2018; 8(1): 10443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28722-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28722-1
Scheer RC , Newman J M, Zhou J J, Oommen A J, Naziri Q, Shah N V, et al. Ankle fracture epidemiology in the United States: patient-related trends and mechanisms of injury. J Foot ankle Surg 2020; 59(3): 479-83. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.09.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2019.09.016
Elsoe R, Ostgaard S E, Larsen P. Population-based epidemiology of 9767 ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Surg 2018; 24(1): 34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.11.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2016.11.002
Juto H, Nilsson H, Morberg P. Epidemiology of adult ankle fractures: 1756 cases identified in Norrbotten County during 2009–2013 and classified according to AO/OTA. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19(1): 441. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2326-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2326-x
Rydberg E M, Wennergren D, Stigevall C, Ekelund J, Möller M. Epidemiology of more than 50,000 ankle fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register during a period of 10 years. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18(1): 79. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03558-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03558-2
Benchimol E I, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, Harron K, Moher D, Peteresen I, et al. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement. PLoS Med 2015; 12(10): 1-22.doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885
Schmidt M, Schmidt S A J, Adelborg K, Sundbøll J, Laugesen K, Ehrenstein V, et al. The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: from health care contacts to database records. Clin Epidemiol 2019; 11: 563-91. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S179083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S179083
Schmidt M, Schmidt S A J, Sandegaard J L, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen H T. The Danish National patient registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol 2015; 7: 449-90. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S91125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S91125
NOMESCO Classification of Surgical Procedures (NCSP), vol. 100. Copenhagen: NOMESCO; 2009.
Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sørensen H T. The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 2014; 29(8): 541-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3
Gundtoft P H, Danielsson F B, Houlind M, Mortensen S O, Corap Y, Bonde N, et al. The positive predictive value of ankle fracture diagnosis in the Danish National Patient Registry. Dan Med J 2022; 69(12): A01220032.
Gundtoft P H, Jørstad M, Erichsen J L, Schmal H, Viberg B. The ability of comorbidity indices to predict mortality in an orthopedic setting: a systematic review. Syst Rev 2021; 10(1): 234. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01785-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01785-4
Larsen P, Al-Bayati M, Elsøe R. The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) during early recovery after ankle fracture. Foot Ankle Int 2021; 42(9): 1179-84. doi: 10.1177/10711007211002811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007211002811
Beerekamp M S H, de Muinck Keizer R J O, Schep N W L, Ubbink D T, Panneman M J M, Goslings J C. Epidemiology of extremity fractures in the Netherlands. Injury 2017; 48(7): 1355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.047
Hemmann P, Friederich M, Körner D, Klopfer T, Bahrs C. Changing epidemiology of lower extremity fractures in adults over a 15-year period: a National Hospital Discharge Registry study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22(1): 456. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04291-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04291-9
Kemler E, van de Port I, Valkenberg H, Hoes A W, Backx F J G. Ankle injuries in the Netherlands: trends over 10–25 years. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2015; 25(3): 331-7. doi: 10.1111/sms.12248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12248
Ranganathan N, Mehta A, DiGiovanni W H, Akhbari B, Waryasz G, Pineda L B, et al. Disparity in sex in ankle fracture treatment. Foot (Edinb) 2023; 57: 102057. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2023.102057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2023.102057
Viberg B, Tofte S, Rønnegaard A B, Jensen S S, Karimi D, Gundtoft P H. Changes in the incidence and treatment of distal radius fractures in adults: a 22-year nationwide register study of 276,145 fractures. Injury 2023; 54(7): 110802. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.05.033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2023.05.033
Larsen P, Rathleff M S, Elsoe R. Surgical versus conservative treatment for ankle fractures in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits and harms. Foot Ankle Surg 2019; 25(4): 409-17. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.02.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2018.02.009
Rask S, Petersen F, Hansen K, Eske M. Danskernes Motions- og Sportsvaner 2020, baggrundsrapport [in Danish], Aarhus; 2020. [in Danish]. Available from: https://www.idan.dk/media/fg0jwckc/baggrundsrapport-final.pdf
Gregersen M G, Robinson H S, Molund M. Concomitant unstable and stable gravity stress tests on weight-bearing stable Weber B ankle fractures treated nonoperatively: a 2-year outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023; 105(18): 1435-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.00195
Carter T H, Oliver W M, Bell K R, Graham C, Duckworth A D, White T O. Operative vs nonoperative management of unstable medial malleolus fractures: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7(1): e2351308. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.51308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.51308
Keene D J, Mistry D, Nam J, Tutton E, Handley R, Morgan L, et al. The Ankle Injury Management (AIM) trial: a pragmatic, multicentre, equivalence randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation comparing close contact casting with open surgical reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of unstable ankle fractures in patients aged over 60 years. Health Technol Assess 2016; 20(75): 1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta20750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20750
Börjesson E, Johannesson K, Ekelund J, Rydberg E M. Non-surgical treatment of lateral malleolar fractures is safe: long-term follow-up of a comprehensive treatment algorithm. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25(1): 818. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07924-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07924-x
Bergdahl C, Nilsson F, Wennergren D, Ekholm C, Möller M. Completeness in the Swedish Fracture Register and the Swedish National Patient Register: an assessment of humeral fracture registrations. Clin Epidemiol 2021; 13: 325-33. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S307762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S307762
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Per H Gundtoft, Alma B Pedersen, Bjarke Viberg
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
