1-year results of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery in Finland: a national FinSpine register study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.42849Keywords:
Fusion versus decompression, Lumbar spinal stenosis, Register data, SpineAbstract
Background and purpose: While the rates of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) surgery have increased continuously internationally, the role of fusion surgery in the treatment of LSS has been under debate. We aimed to assess the outcome of LSS surgery at 1 year postoperatively and to compare decompression surgery with or without fusion based on the Finnish national spine register FinSpine data.
Methods: FinSpine data of surgically treated LSS from 2015 to 2022 was included. The primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and secondary ones were Visual Analogue Scale for leg and back pain. Predetermined minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for all outcome measures was used to assess the clinical significance of differences in outcomes. Propensity score matching was utilized to ensure that the treatment groups were comparable.
Results: There were 8,647 LSS patients in the data, of whom 6,751 (77%) were the subject of decompression surgery. Over 90% of patients without spondylolisthesis received decompression alone. At 1-year follow-up, ODI was on average 20.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.3–21.9]) for the fusion group and 23.3 (CI 22.5–24.0) for the decompression group. Differences in ODI, VAS leg pain, or VAS back pain were below the MCID. The share of patients reaching ODI percentage change score ≥ 30% was 74% (CI 71–78) in the fusion group and 66% (CI 63–68) in the decompression group.
Conclusion: Most of the LSS patients experienced significant improvement after LSS surgery. We found no clinical differences between decompression surgery with and without fusion.
Downloads
References
Johnsson K E, Rosén I, Udén A. The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992: (279): 82-6. PMID: 1534726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199206000-00010
Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis?: A randomized controlled trial. Spine 2007; 32: 1-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d
Weinstein J N, Tosteson T D, Lurie J D, Tosteson A N A, Blood E, Hanscom B, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 794-810. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0707136
Försth P, Michaëlsson K, Sandén B. Does fusion improve the outcome after decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis?: a two-year follow-up study involving 5390 patients. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-b: 960-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b7.30776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.30776
Sunderland G, Foster M, Dheerendra S, Pillay R. Patient-reported outcomes following lumbar decompression surgery: a review of 2699 cases. Global Spine J 2021; 11: 172-9. doi: 10.1177/2192568219896541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219896541
van Hooff M L, Jacobs W C, Willems P C, Wouters M W, de Kleuver M, Peul W C, et al. Evidence and practice in spine registries. Acta Orthop 2015; 86: 534-44. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1043174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1043174
Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgström F, Fritzell P, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 1413-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1513721
Ponkilainen V T, Huttunen T T, Neva M H, Pekkanen L, Repo J P, Mattila V M. National trends in lumbar spine decompression and fusion surgery in Finland, 1997–2018. Acta Orthop 2021; 92: 199-23. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1839244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1839244
Marjamaa J, Huttunen J, Kankare J, Malmivaara A, Pernaa K, Salmenkivi J, et al. The Finnish spine register (FinSpine): development, design, validation and utility. Eur Spine J 2023; 10.1007/s00586-023-07874-3. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07874-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07874-3
Clement R C, Welander A, Stowell C, Cha T D, Chen J L, Davies M, et al. A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain. Acta Orthop 2015; 86: 523-33. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1036696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1036696
Copay A G, Glassman S D, Subach B R, Berven S, Schuler T C, Carreon L Y. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 2008; 8: 968-74. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.006
Fairbank J C. Why are there different versions of the Oswestry Disability Index? J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 20: 83-6. doi: 10.3171/2013.9.Spine13344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.9.SPINE13344
Mannion A F, Junge A, Grob D, Dvorak J, Fairbank J C. Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 2: sensitivity to change after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 66-73. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0816-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0816-z
Ostelo R W, Deyo R A, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M, et al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33: 90-4. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10
Austevoll I M, Gjestad R, Grotle M, Solberg T, Brox JI , Hermansen E, et al. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20: 31. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2386-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2386-y
van Hooff M L, Mannion A F, Staub L P, Ostelo R W, Fairbank J C. Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a “satisfactory symptom state” in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine: a Spine Tango registry-based study. Spine J 2016; 16: 1221-30. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.06.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.06.010
Crawford C H 3rd, Glassman S D, Mummaneni P V, Knightly J J, Asher A L. Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain. J Neurosurg Spine 2016; 25: 596-601. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.Spine151468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.3.SPINE151468
Srinivas S, Paquet J, Bailey C, Nataraj A, Stratton A, Johnson M, et al. Effect of spinal decompression on back pain in lumbar spinal stenosis: a Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) study. Spine J 2019; 19: 1001-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.01.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.01.003
Lønne G, Schoenfeld A J, Cha T D, Nygaard Ø P, Zwart J A H, Solberg T. Variation in selection criteria and approaches to surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis among patients treated in Boston and Norway. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2017; 156: 77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.03.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.03.008
Lønne G, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Nordvall D, Gerdhem P, Lagerbäck T, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of surgical practice variation and clinical outcome in three national spine registries. Spine J 2019; 19: 41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.028
Austevoll I M, Hermansen E, Fagerland M W, Storheim K, Brox J I, Solberg T, et al. Decompression with or without fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 2021; 385: 526-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2100990
Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler W E, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge S N, et al. Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 1424-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1508788
Solberg T K, Sørlie A, Sjaavik K, Nygaard Ø P, Ingebrigtsen T. Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine? Acta Orthop 2011; 82: 56-63. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.548024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.548024
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Juho Hatakka, Inari Laaksonen, Joel Kostensalo, Keijo T Mäkelä, Henri Salo, Katri Pernaa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
