Vascularized fibular grafting following tumor resection demonstrates acceptable long-term outcomes in Denmark: a national retrospective cohort study

Authors

  • Christian Lind Nielsen Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3495-661X
  • Daniel Thor Halberg Dybdal Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5039-0367
  • Peter Vester-Glowinski Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns Treatment, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Lisa Lyngsie Hjalgrim Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Pernille Edslev Wendtland Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Birgitte Jul Kiil Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Michael Melchior Bendtsen Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Michael Mørk Petersen Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2324-6420
  • Thomas Baad-Hansen Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.42848

Keywords:

Bone tumours, Oncology

Abstract

Background and purpose: Vascularized fibular grafting following tumor resection is an essential treatment option in limb salvage surgery. We aimed to evaluate: (I) bone healing, (II) complications and reoperations, (III) limb salvage, and (IV) survival.
Methods: We present a retrospective evaluation of a national cohort comprising 27 patients. The indications were 13 cases of Ewing sarcoma, 12 cases of osteosarcoma, and 2 cases of giant cell tumor. The median age at surgery was 16 years (interquartile range [IQR] 10–18), and the median follow-up was 82 months (IQR 32–101). Patients were analyzed overall, as well as in subgroups based on tumor location (upper versus lower extremity) and pathology (osteosarcoma versus Ewing sarcoma).
Results: The primary rate of graft union was 63%, and after secondary procedures the overall rate of graft union was 67%, with a median time to union of 13 months (IQR 9–17). The reoperation rate was 74%, while the limb salvage rate was 93%. The 5-year overall survival rate was 81% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61–92). Patients with upper extremity tumors were more likely to attain graft union (risk ratio [RR] 5.5, CI 1.3–31.5) and less likely to undergo multiple reoperations (RR 0.3, CI 0.8–0.9) than patients with lower extremity tumors.
Conclusion: Vascularized fibular grafting following tumor resection was associated with a graft union rate of 67%, a high frequency of reoperations, a high limb salvage rate (93%), and a 5-year survival rate of 81%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Valery P C, Laversanne M, Bray F. Bone cancer incidence by morphological subtype: a global assessment. Cancer Causes Control 2015; 26: 1127-39. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0607-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0607-3

Siegel R L, Miller K D, Wagle N S, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73: 17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21763

Elomaa I, Blomqvist C P, Saeter G, Akerman M, Stenwig E, Wiebe T, et al. Five-year results in Ewing’s sarcoma. The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group experience with the SSG IX protocol. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36: 875-80. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00028-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00028-9

Mirabello L, Troisi R J, Savage S A. Osteosarcoma incidence and survival rates from 1973 to 2004: data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer 2009; 115: 1531-43. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24121

Tsuda Y, Tsoi K, Stevenson JD, Fujiwara T, Tillman R, Abudu A. Extendable endoprostheses in skeletally immature patients: a study of 124 children surviving more than 10 years after resection of bone sarcomas. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102: 151-62. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.19.00621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00621

Racano A, Pazionis T, Farrokhyar F, Deheshi B, Ghert M. High infection rate outcomes in long-bone tumor surgery with endoprosthetic reconstruction in adults: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 2017-27. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2842-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2842-9

Portney D A, Bi A S, Christian R A, Butler B A, Peabody T D. Outcomes of expandable prostheses for primary bone malignancies in skeletally immature patients: a systematic review and pooled data analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 2020; 40: e487-e497. doi: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000001459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001459

Wood M B, Cooney W P, Irons G B. Posttraumatic lower extremity reconstruction by vascularized bone graft transfer. Orthopedics 1984; 7: 255-62. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19840201-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-19840201-11

Weiland A J, Weiss A P, Moore J R, Tolo V T. Vascularized fibular grafts in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72: 654-62. PMID: 2355026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199072050-00003

Houdek M T, Bayne C O, Bishop A T, Shin A Y. The outcome and complications of vascularised fibular grafts. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B: 134-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b1.bjj-2016-0160.r1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0160.R1

Brunelli G A, Vigasio A, Brunelli G R. Microvascular fibular grafts in skeleton reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (314): 241-6. PMID: 7634641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199505000-00031

Brown K L. Limb reconstruction with vascularized fibular grafts after bone tumor resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; (262): 64-73. PMID: 1984933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199101000-00009

Estrella E P, Wang E H. A comparison of vascularized free fibular flaps and nonvascularized fibular grafts for reconstruction of long bone defects after tumor resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33: 194-205. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1594299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1594299

Moore J B, Mazur J M, Zehr D, Davis P K, Zook E G. A biomechanical comparison of vascularized and conventional autogenous bone grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73: 382-6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198403000-00007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198403000-00007

Zaretski A, Amir A, Meller I, Leshem D, Kollender Y, Barnea Y, et al. Free fibula long bone reconstruction in orthopedic oncology: a surgical algorithm for reconstructive options. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 1989-2000. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122213.82011.c5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000122213.82011.C5

Chen C M, Disa J J, Lee H Y, Mehrara B J, Hu Q Y, Nathan S, et al. Reconstruction of extremity long bone defects after sarcoma resection with vascularized fibula flaps: a 10-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 915-24; discussion 925-6. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000252306.72483.9b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000252306.72483.9b

Eward W C, Kontogeorgakos V, Levin L S, Brigman B E. Free vascularized fibular graft reconstruction of large skeletal defects after tumor resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 590-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1053-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1053-x

Hsu R W W, Wood M B, Sim F H, Chao E Y S. Free vascularised fibular grafting for reconstruction after tumour resection. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79-B: 36-42. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b1.6818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.79B1.6818

Petersen M M, Hovgaard D, Elberg J J, Rechnitzer C, Daugaard S, Muhic A. Vascularized fibula grafts for reconstruction of bone defects after resection of bone sarcomas. Sarcoma 2010; 2010: 524721. doi: 10.1155/2010/524721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/524721

De Boer H, Wood M. Bone changes in the vascularised fibular graft. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989; 71-B: 374-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.71b3.2722923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.71B3.2722923

Donati D, Di Liddo M, Zavatta M, Manfrini M, Bacci G, Picci P, et al. Massive bone allograft reconstruction in high-grade osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; (377): 186-94. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200008000-00025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200008000-00025

Hornicek F J, Gebhardt M C, Tomford W W, Sorger J I, Zavatta M, Menzner J P, et al. Factors affecting nonunion of the allograft–host junction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (382): 87-98. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200101000-00014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200101000-00014

Hilven P H, Bayliss L, Cosker T, Dijkstra P D, Jutte P C, Lahoda L U, et al. The vascularised fibular graft for limb salvage after bone tumour surgery: a multicentre study. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B: 853-61. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.97b6.34692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B6.34692

Xu L, Wen L, Qiao J, Zhu Z, Qiu Y, Xiong J, et al. Clinical outcome of free vascularized fibula graft in the surgical treatment of extremity osteosarcoma. Orthop Surg 2020; 12: 727-33. doi: 10.1111/os.12646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12646

Hariri A, Mascard E, Atlan F, Germain M A, Heming N, Dubousset J F, et al. Free vascularised fibular graft for reconstruction of defects of the lower limb after resection of tumour. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92-B: 1574-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.92b11.23832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B11.23832

Published

2025-01-13

How to Cite

Nielsen, C. L., Dybdal, D. T. H., Vester-Glowinski, P., Hjalgrim, L. L., Wendtland, P. E., Kiil, B. J., … Baad-Hansen, T. (2025). Vascularized fibular grafting following tumor resection demonstrates acceptable long-term outcomes in Denmark: a national retrospective cohort study. Acta Orthopaedica, 96, 87–93. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.42848