Can pin-site inflammation be detected with thermographic imaging? A cross-sectional study from the USA and Denmark of patients treated with external fixators

Authors

  • Marie Fridberg Interdisciplinary Orthopedics, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8134-9444
  • Ole Rahbek Interdisciplinary Orthopedics, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5602-4533
  • Hans-Christen Husum Interdisciplinary Orthopedics, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6953-042X
  • Bafor Anirejuoritse Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-5324
  • Kirsten Duch Research Data and Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Center of Rheumatic Research (CERRA), Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
  • Christopher Iobst Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
  • Søren Kold Interdisciplinary Orthopedics, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41901

Keywords:

External fixator, Infection, Inflammation, Pin site, Thermography

Abstract

Background and purpose: Patients with external fixators are at risk of pin-site infection. A tool for objective monitoring of pin sites for evolving signs of infection is warranted. We aimed to investigate the temperature (MaxTp) difference between clean and visually inflamed pin sites using thermography and to establish the optimal cut-off value of MaxTp using thermography as a screening tool for inflammation detection.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study performed in the USA and Denmark of patients with circular external fixators. Pin sites were visually judged by a surgeon or a nurse as clean or as showing signs of inflammation. The MaxTp was obtained at the pin site by thermographic imaging using an infrared camera (FLIR T540).
Results: We included 1,970 pin sites from 83 patients. The mean MaxTp for clean pin sites (n = 1,739) was 33.1°C (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.8–33.4) and the mean MaxTp for visual inflamed pin sites (n = 231) was 34.0°C (CI 33.6–34.3). The mean difference, when adjusted for repeated observations of patients and pin sites, was statistically significant with a difference of 0.9°C (CI 0.7–1.1) (P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for MaxTp as a screening tool to detect visual signs of inflammation was 0.71 (CI 0.65–0.76). The empirically optimal cut-off value was 34.1°C with a sensitivity of 65%, a specificity of 72%, a positive predictive value of 23%, and a negative predictive value of 94%.
Conclusion: We found a statistically significant difference in mean temperature between pin sites with and without visual signs of inflammation. Thermography could be a promising tool for future point of care technology for monitoring inflammation around pin sites.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Iobst C A. Pin-track infections: past, present, and future. J Limb Lengthen Reconstr 2017; 3(2): 79-84. doi: 10.4103/jllr.jllr_17_17.

Bafor A, Gehred A, Chimutengwende-Gordon M, Iobst C A. Future directions in the prevention of pin-site infection: a scoping review. J Limb Lengthen Reconstr 2022; 8(Suppl 1): S69-80. doi: 10.4103/jllr.jllr_2_22.

Kazmers N H, Fragomen A T, Rozbruch S R. Prevention of pin site infection in external fixation: a review of the literature. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2016; 11(2): 75-85. doi: 10.1007/s11751-016-0256-4 .

Ferreira N, Marais L C. Prevention and management of external fixator pin track sepsis. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2012; 7(2): 67-72. doi: 10.1007/s11751-012-0139-2.

Ceroni D, Grumetz C, Desvachez O, Pusateri S, Dunand P, Samara E. From prevention of pin-tract infection to treatment of osteomyelitis during paediatric external fixation. J Child Orthop 2016; 10(6): 605-12. doi: 10.1007/s11832-016-0787-8.

Frank F A, Stubbs D, Ferguson J Y, McNally M. A practical definition of pin site infection. Injury 2024; 55(2): 111230. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.1112307.

Lethaby A, Temple J, Santy J. Pin site care for preventing infections associated with external bone fixators and pins. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (12): CD004551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004551.pub3.

Walter N, Rupp M, Olesen U K, Alt V. Which pin site dressing is the most optimal? A systematic review on current evidence. J Limb Lengthen Reconstr 2022; 8(Suppl 1). doi: 10.4103/jllr.jllr_29_21.

Ferguson D, Dixon J, Eardley W. Do pin site cleaning techniques and solutions affect pin site infection rate in external fixation? A systematic review of randomized and nonrandomized trials. J Limb Lengthen Reconstr 2022; 8(Suppl 1). doi: 10.4103/jllr.jllr_9_22.

Sharma H K, Ferreira N, McDaid C, McNally M. international pin site consensus: time to develop common grounds and collaborate? J Limb Lengthen Reconstr 2022; 8(Suppl 1). doi: 10.4103/jllr.jllr_30_22.

Iliadis A D, Shields D W, Jamal B, Heidari N. Current classifications of pin site infection and quality of reporting: a systematic review. J Limb Lengthen Reconstr 2022; 8(Suppl 1). doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1562.

Rahbek O, Husum H C, Fridberg M, Ghaffari A, Kold S. Intrarater reliability of digital thermography in detecting pin site infection: a proof of concept study. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021; 16(1): 1-7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1522.

Annadatha S, Hua Q, Fridberg M, Lindstrøm Jensen T, Liu J, Kold S, et al. Preparing infection detection technology for hospital at home after lower limb external fixation. Digit Health 2022; 8. doi: 10.1177/20552076221109502.

Fitzpatrick T B. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol 1988; 124(6): 869-71. doi: 10.1001/archderm.124.6.869.

Gordon J E, Kelly-Hahn J, Carpenter C J, Schoenecker P L. Pin site care during external fixation in children: results of a nihilistic approach. J Pediatr Orthop 2000; 20(2): 163-5. PMID: 10739275.

Groenewoud R, China H, Bone J, Sabharwal S, Iobst C, Bafor A, et al. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Checketts’ Grading System for pin-site infections across all skin colours. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023; 18(1): 2-6. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1581.

Harrap M J M, De Ibarra N H, Whitney H M, Rands S A. Reporting of thermography parameters in biology: a systematic review of thermal imaging literature. R Soc Open Sci 2018; 5(12): 181281. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181281.

Fernández-Cuevas I, Marins J C, Lastras J A, Carmona P G, Quintana M S. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of skin temperature in healthy subjects using infrared thermography. In: Humbert P, Fanian F, Maibach H, Agache P, editors. Agache’s measuring the skin: non-invasive investigations, physiology, normal constants. 2nd ed. 2017 (May 2020). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. pp: 1311-18. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32383-1_74.

Annadatha S, Fridberg M, Kold S, Rahbek O, Shen M. A tool for thermal image annotation and automatic temperature extraction around orthopedic pin sites. In: 2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Image Processing Applications and Systems (IPAS) 2022. pp: 1-5. doi: 10.1109/IPAS55744.2022.10053084.

Cortes C, Mohri M. Confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2004; 17.

Youden W J. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950; 3(1): 32-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3.

Chanmugam A, Langemo D, Thomason K, Haan J, Altenburger E A, Tippett A, et al. Relative temperature maximum in wound infection and inflammation as compared with a control subject using long-wave infrared thermography. Adv Skin Wound Care 2017; 30(9): 406-14. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000522161.13573.62.

Childs C, Wright N, Willmott J, Davies M, Kilner K, Ousey K, et al. The surgical wound in infrared: thermographic profiles and early stage test-accuracy to predict surgical site infection in obese women during the first 30 days after caesarean section. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019; 8(1): 7. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0461-7.

Derwin R, Patton D, Strapp H, Moore Z. The effect of inflammation management on pH, temperature, and bacterial burden. Int Wound J 2023; 20(4): 1118-29. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13970.

Childs C, Siraj M R, Selvan A N, Soltani H, Wilmott J, Farrell T, et al. Thermal territories of the abdomen after caesarean section birth: infrared thermography and analysis. J Wound Care [Internet] 2016; 25(9): 499-512. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.9.499.

Teixeira D L, Boyle L A, Enríquez-Hidalgo D. Skin temperature of slaughter pigs with tail lesions. Front Vet Sci 2020; 7(April): 10-12. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00198.

Van Der Saag D, Lomax S, Windsor P A, Taylor C, White P J. Evaluating treatments with topical anaesthetic and buccal meloxicam for pain and inflammation caused by amputation dehorning of calves. PLoS One 2018; 13(6): 1-13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198808.

Fridberg M, Bafor A, Iobst C A, Laugesen B, Jepsen J F, Rahbek O, et al. The role of thermography in assessment of wounds: a scoping review. J Injury 2024; 55(11): 111833. dob: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111833

Charlton M, Stanley S A, Whitman Z, Wenn V, Coats T J, Sims M, et al. The effect of constitutive pigmentation on the measured emissivity of human skin. PLoS One 2020; 15(11): e0241843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241843.

Ammer K. Current trends in medical thermography: assurance and data mining. Thermology Int 2018; 28(1): 5-6.

Ring E F J, Ammer K. Infrared thermal imaging in medicine. Physiol Meas 2012; 33(3): R33-46. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/3/R33.

Christiansen J, Dudley W. International Academy of Clinical Thermology Quality Assurance Guidelines Standards and Protocols in Clinical Thermographic Imaging 2015; (January): 1-35. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.28341.78562.

Siah C J R, Childs C, Chia C K, Cheng K F K. An observational study of temperature and thermal images of surgical wounds for detecting delayed wound healing within four days after surgery. J Clin Nurs 2019; 28(11-12): 2285-95. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14832.

Fernández-Cuevas I, Bouzas Marins J C, Arnáiz Lastras J, Gómez Carmona P M, Piñonosa Cano S, García-Concepción M Á, et al. Classification of factors influencing the use of infrared thermography in humans: a review. Vol. 71, Infrared physics and technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier BV; 2015. pp 28-55. doi: 10.1016/j.infrared.2015.02.007.

Tattersall G J. Infrared thermography: a non-invasive window into thermal physiology. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 2016; 202:78-98. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.02.022.

Additional Files

Published

2024-09-23

How to Cite

Fridberg, M., Rahbek, O., Husum, H.-C., Anirejuoritse, B., Duch, K., Iobst, C., & Kold, S. (2024). Can pin-site inflammation be detected with thermographic imaging? A cross-sectional study from the USA and Denmark of patients treated with external fixators. Acta Orthopaedica, 95, 562–569. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41901