Association of surgeon volume with complications following direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty: a population-based study

Authors

  • Pakpoom Ruangsomboon Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7041-3562
  • Elmunzar Bagouri Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Daniel Pincus Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Canada
  • J Michael Paterson ICES, Toronto, Canada
  • Bheeshma Ravi Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41506

Keywords:

complications, DAA, Direct anterior approach, surgical volume, THA, total hip arthroplasty

Abstract

Background and purpose: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be performed through various surgical approaches, including direct anterior (DAA). DAA-THA may offer faster recovery but carries a higher risk of complications, which may be mitigated by surgeon volume and experience. We examined the association of surgeons’ annual surgical volume with major complications after DAA-THA in a population-based sample.
Methods: A population-based retrospective cohort study was carried out on primary DAA-THA patients in Ontario between April 2016 and March 2021. We used restricted cubic splines to visually define the association between annual DAA surgeon volume and the risk of major surgical complications (fractures, dislocations, infections, and revisions) within 1 year of surgery. We further compared the complication rates amongst different DAA volume categories (< 30, 30–60, and > 60 cases/year).
Results: The study encompassed 9,672 DAA-THA patients (52% female, median age 67 years). We showed a sharp decline in the probability of complications as the surgical volume of DAA-THA increased within the lower range of 0–30 cases/year; the probability slightly increased after the surgical volume exceeded 60 cases/year. The overall complication rates were 3.09%, 2.24%, and 2.18% for the surgical experience group of < 30 cases/year, 30–60 cases/year, and > 60 cases/year, respectively.
Conclusion: There was an inverse relationship between surgical volume and complication rates in DAA-THA within the lower volume ranges. Maintaining a surgical volume of at least 30 DAA-THA cases/year can minimize complications, emphasizing the importance of surgical volume in this approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yan L, Ge L, Dong S, Saluja K, Li D, Reddy K S, et al. Evaluation of comparative efficacy and safety of surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open 2023; 6(1): e2253942. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53942.

Hanly R J, Sokolowski S, Timperley A J. The SPAIRE technique allows sparing of the piriformis and obturator internus in a modified posterior approach to the hip. Hip Int 2017; 27(2): 205-9. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000490.

Charity J, Ball S, Timperley A J. The use of a modified posterior approach (SPAIRE) may be associated with an increase in return to pre-injury level of mobility compared to a standard lateral approach in hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures: a single-centre study of the first 285 cases over a period of 3.5 years. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2023; 49(1): 155-63. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02047-1.

Meermans G, Konan S, Das R, Volpin A, Haddad F S. The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B(6): 732-40. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.38053.

Woolson S T. A survey of Hip Society surgeons concerning the direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B(7_Supple_B): 57-61. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-1493.R1.

Pincus D, Jenkinson R, Paterson M, Leroux T, Ravi B. Association between surgical approach and major surgical complications in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. JAMA 2020; 323(11): 1070-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0785.

de Steiger R N, Lorimer M, Solomon M. What is the learning curve for the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(12): 3860-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4565-6.

Nairn L, Gyemi L, Gouveia K, Ekhtiari S, Khanna V. The learning curve for the direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop 2021; 45(8): 1971-82. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-04986-7.

Peters R M, Ten Have B L E F, Rykov K, Van Steenbergen L, Putter H, Rutgers M, et al. The learning curve of the direct anterior approach is 100 cases: an analysis based on 15,875 total hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2022; 93:775-82. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.4802.

Ravi B, Jenkinson R, Austin P C, Croxford R, Wasserstein D, Escott B, et al. Relation between surgeon volume and risk of complications after total hip arthroplasty: propensity score matched cohort study. BMJ 2014; 348:g3284. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3284.

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock S J, Gøtzsche P C, Vandenbroucke J P, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007; 335: 806–8. doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD.

Deyo R A, Cherkin D C, Ciol M A. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45(6): 613-19. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8.

Weiner J, Abrams C. The Johns Hopkins ACG® System: Technical Reference Guide Version 10.0 2011. The Johns Hopkins ACG® System Excerpt from Version 11.0 Technical Reference Guide. Published online 2015. Available at https://www.hopkinsacg.org/document/acg-system-version-10-0-technical-reference-guide/

Mehta B, Ho K, Ling V, Goodman S, Parks M, Ravi B, et al. Are income-based differences in TKA use and outcomes reduced in a single-payer system? A large-database comparison of the United States and Canada. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480(9): 1636-45. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002207.

Christara C C, Ng K S. Adaptive techniques for spline collocation. Computing 2006; 76(3-4): 259-277. doi: 10.1007/s00607-005-0141-3.

Klag E A, Heil H O, Wesemann L D, Charters M A, North W T. Higher annual total hip arthroplasty volume decreases the risk of intraoperative periprosthetic femur fractures. J Arthroplasty 2023: S0883-5403(23)00762-3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.07.014.

Shimmin A J, Graves S, Noble P C. the effect of operative volume on the outcome of hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25(3): e4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.01.012.

Liddle A D, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray D W. Optimal usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 41,986 cases from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B(11): 1506-11. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B11.35551.

Badawy M, Fenstad A M, Bartz-Johannessen C A, Indrekvam K, Havelin L I, Robertsson O, et al. Hospital volume and the risk of revision in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the Nordic countries: an observational study of 14,496 cases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18: 388. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1750-7.

Ruangsomboon P, Paugchawee J, Narkbunnam R, Chareancholvanich K, Pornrattanamaneewong C. The factors influencing the component sizes in Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2022; 33(3): 505-12. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.786.

Sugioka Y. Transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy in the treatment of idiopathic and steroid-induced femoral head necrosis, Perthes’ disease, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, and osteoarthritis of the hip: indications and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; (184): 12-23. PMID: 6705333

Hartofilakidis G, Stamos K, Karachalios T. Treatment of high dislocation of the hip in adults with total hip arthroplasty: operative technique and long-term clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80(4): 510.

Ward M M. Complications of total hip arthroplasty in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019; 71(8): 1101-8. doi: 10.1002/acr.23582.

Markel J F, Adams N A, Srivastava A K, Zheng T H, Hallstrom B R, Markel D C. Do “surgeon champions” and high-volume surgeons have lower rates of periprosthetic femur fracture? Perspective. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38(7S): S247-S251. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.016.

Van Den Eeden Y, Van Den Eeden F. Learning curve of direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a single surgeon experience. Acta Orthop Belg 2018; 84(3): 321-30.

Kong X, Grau L, Ong A, Yang C, Chai W. Adopting the direct anterior approach: experience and learning curve in a Chinese patient population. J Orthop Surg Res 2019; 14(1): 218. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1272-0.

Foissey C, Fauvernier M, Fary C, Servien E, Lustig S, Batailler C. Total hip arthroplasty performed by direct anterior approach: does experience influence the learning curve? SICOT J 2020; 6:15. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2020015.

Reichert J C, Wassilew G I, von Rottkay E, Noeth U. Compared learning curves of the direct anterior and anterolateral approach for minimally invasive hip replacement. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2022; 14(3): 37500. doi: 10.52965/001c.37500

Published

2024-09-10

How to Cite

Ruangsomboon, P., Bagouri, E., Pincus, D., Paterson, J. M., & Ravi, B. (2024). Association of surgeon volume with complications following direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty: a population-based study. Acta Orthopaedica, 95, 505–511. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41506

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories