A systematic review of crosswalks for converting patient-reported outcome measure scores in hip, knee, and shoulder replacement surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41384Keywords:
Arthroplasty, Crosswalks, Hip, Knee, Patient-reported outcome measures, ShoulderAbstract
Background and purpose: We aimed to systematically review studies of crosswalks for converting patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores used in joint replacement, and develop a database of published crosswalks.
Methods: 4 electronic databases were searched from January 2000 to May 2023 to identify studies reporting the development and/or validation of crosswalks to convert PROM scores in patients undergoing elective hip, knee, or shoulder replacement surgery. Data on study and sample characteristics, source and target PROMs, and crosswalk development and validation methods were extracted from eligible studies. Study reporting was evaluated using the Mapping onto Preference-based measures reporting Standards (MAPS) checklist.
Results: 17 studies describing 35 crosswalks were eligible for inclusion. Unidirectional crosswalks were available to convert hip-specific (Oxford Hip Score [OHS]) and knee-specific (Oxford Knee Score [OKS]) scores to the EQ-5D-3L/EQ-5D-5L. Similar crosswalks to convert disease-specific scores (WOMAC) to the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and ICECAP-O Capability Index were identified. Bidirectional crosswalks for converting OHS and OKS to the HOOS-JR/HOOS-12 and KOOS-JR/KOOS-12, for converting WOMAC to the HOOS-JR/KOOS-JR, and for converting HOOS-Function/KOOS-Function to the PROMIS-Physical Function were also available. Additionally, crosswalks to convert generic PROM scores from the UCLA Activity Scale to the Lower Extremity Activity Scale in both directions were available. No crosswalks were identified for converting scores in shoulder replacement. Development methods varied with the type of target score; most studies used regression, item response theory, or equipercentile equating approaches. Reporting quality was variable, particularly for methods and results items, impacting crosswalk application.
Conclusion: This is the first synthesis of published crosswalks for converting joint-specific (OHS, OKS, HOOS, KOOS), disease-specific (WOMAC), and generic PROMs scores (PROMIS-Physical Function, UCLA Activity Scale, Lower Extremity Activity Scale) used to assess joint replacement outcomes, providing a resource for data harmonization and pooled analysis. Crosswalks were developed using regression methods (9 studies), equipercentile equating methods (5 studies), a combination of equipercentile equating and item response theory methods (2 studies), and a combination of regression and equipercentile equating methods (1 study). A range of crosswalk validation approaches were adopted, including the use of external datasets, separate samples or subsets, follow-up data from additional time points, or bootstrapped samples. Efforts are needed to standardize crosswalk methodology and achieve consistent reporting.
Downloads
References
Rolfson O, Wissig S, van Maasakkers L, Stowell C, Ackerman I, Ayers D, et al. Defining an international standard set of outcome measures for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: Consensus of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Working Group. Arthritis Care Res 2016; 68(11): 1631-9. doi: 10.1002/acr.22868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22868
Rolfson O, Bohm E, Franklin P, Lyman S, Denissen G, Dawson J, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries. Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis. Acta Orthop 2016; 87(Suppl 362): 9-23. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1181816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1181816
Bohm E R, Kirby S, Trepman E, Hallstrom B R, Rolfson O, Wilkinson J M, et al. Collection and reporting of patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries: multinational survey and recommendations. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2021; 479(10): 2151-66. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001852
Ingelsrud L H, Wilkinson J M, Overgaard S, Rolfson O, Hallstrom B, Navarro R A, et al. How do patient-reported outcome scores in international hip and knee arthroplasty registries compare? Clin Orthop Rel Res 2022; 480(10): 1884-96. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002306
ten Klooster P M, Oude Voshaar M A H, Gandek B, Rose M, Bjorner J B, Taal E, et al. Development and evaluation of a crosswalk between the SF-36 physical functioning scale and Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index in rheumatoid arthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013; 11(1):199. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-199
Marrie R A, Dufault B, Tyry T, Cutter G R, Fox R J, Salter A. Developing a crosswalk between the RAND-12 and the Health Utilities Index for multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis J 2020; 26(9): 1102-10. doi: 10.1177/1352458519852722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458519852722
Rothmund M, Pilz M J, Schlosser L, Arraras J I, Groenvold M, Holzner B, et al. Equipercentile equating of scores from common patient-reported outcome measures of physical function in patients with cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 165: 111203. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.019
Polascik B A, Hidaka C, Thompson M C, Tong-Ngork S, Wagner J L, Plummer O, et al. Crosswalks between knee and hip arthroplasty short forms: HOOS/KOOS JR and Oxford. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102(11): 983-90. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00916
Putman S, Preda C, Girard J, Duhamel A, Migaud H. Mapping and crosswalk of the Oxford Hip Score and different versions of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2021; 479(7): 1534-44. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001675
Soh S E, Harris IA, Cashman K, Graves S E, Ackerman I N. Crosswalks between the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores and the HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 instruments. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2022; 30(4): 570-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.01.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2022.01.004
Dakin H, Abel L, Burns R, Yang Y. Review and critical appraisal of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D: an online database and application of the MAPS statement. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2018; 16(1): 31. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0857-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0857-3
PRISMA. PRISMA checklist. Available from: http://prisma-statement.org/PRISMAstatement/checklist.aspx (accessed February 13, 2024).
University of Oxford Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Group. PROM Group construct and instrument type filters February 2010. Available from: https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/prom-search-filter-oxford-2010.pdf (accessed March 23, 2023).
Petrou S, Rivero-Arias O, Dakin H, Longworth L, Oppe M, Froud R, et al. Preferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: the MAPS Statement. Pharmacoeconomics 2015; 33(10): 985-91. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0319-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-015-0319-2
Clement N D, Afzal I, Peacock C J H, MacDonald D, Macpherson G J, Patton J T, et al. Mapping analysis to predict the associated EuroQol five-dimension three-level utility values from the Oxford Knee Score: a prediction and validation study. Bone Jt Open 2022; 3(7): 573-81. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0054.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0054.R1
Dakin H, Gray A, Murray D. Mapping analyses to estimate EQ-5D utilities and responses based on Oxford Knee Score. Qual Life Res 2013, 22(3): 683-94. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0189-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0189-4
Fleisher I T, Thompson M C, Mensah C J, Joseph A D, McLawhorn A S, Padgett D E, et al. Development and validation of crosswalks between the Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement/Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37(6): 1034-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.11.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.11.009
Ghomrawi H M, Lee Y Y, Herrero C, Joseph A, Padgett D, Westrich G, et al. A crosswalk between UCLA and Lower Extremity Activity scales. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475(2): 542-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5130-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5130-7
Heng M, Tang X, Schalet B D, Collins A K, Chen A F, Melnic C M, et al. Can the Knee Outcome and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS) Function subscale be linked to the PROMIS Physical Function to crosswalk equivalent scores? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479(12): 2653-64. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001857
Odum S M, Fehring T K and the Knee Society Crosswalk Writing Group. Can original Knee Society Scores be used to estimate new 2011 Knee Society Scores? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475(1): 160-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4886-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4886-0
Pinedo-Villanueva R A, Turner D, Judge A, Raftery J P, Arden N K. Mapping the Oxford Hip Score onto the EQ-5D utility index. Qual Life Res 2013; 22(3): 665-75. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0174-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0174-y
Tang X, Schalet B D, Heng M, Lange J K, Bedair H S, O’Brien T M, et al. Linking the KOOS-PS to PROMIS Physical Function in knee patients evaluated for surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30(6): 281-9. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00461
Wailoo A, Hernandez Alava M, Escobar Martinez A. Modelling the relationship between the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index and EQ-5D. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2014; 12: 37. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-37
Bilbao A, Martin-Fernandez J, Garcia-Perez L, Arenaza J C, Ariza-Cardiel G, Ramallo-Farina Y, et al. Mapping WOMAC onto the EQ-5D-5L Utility Index in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Value Health 2020; 23(3): 379-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.2755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.2755
Fawaz H, Yassine O, Hammad A, Bedwani R, Abu-Sheasha G. Mapping of disease-specific Oxford Knee Score onto EQ-5D-5L utility index in knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18(1): 84. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03522-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03522-0
Martin-Fernandez J, Morey-Montalvo M, Tomas-Garcia N, Martin-Ramos E, Munoz-Garcia J C, Polentinos-Castro E, et al. Mapping analysis to predict EQ-5D-5 L utility values based on the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) questionnaires in the Spanish population suffering from lower limb osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18(1): 184. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01435-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01435-8
Heng M, Stern B Z, Tang X, Schalet B D, Collins A K, Chen A F, et al. Linking Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form and PROMIS Physical Function. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30(15) :e1043-e1050. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00736
Mitchell P M, Roberts T E, Barton P M, Pollard B S, Coast J. Predicting the ICECAP-O Capability Index from the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index: is mapping onto capability from condition-specific health status questionnaires feasible? Med Decis Making 2013; 33(4): 547-57. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12475092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X12475092
Dorans N J. Equating methods and sampling designs. Appl Meas Educ 1990; 3(1): 3-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0301_2
Kendir C, de Bienassis K, Slawomirski L, Klazinga N, Turnau M, Terner M, et al. International assessment of the use and results of patient-reported outcome measures for hip and knee replacement surgery: findings of the OECD Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) Working Group on hip and knee replacement surgery. OECD Health Working Papers No 148. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2022.
Wailoo A J, Hernandez-Alava M, Manca A, Mejia A, Ray J, Crawford B, et al. Mapping to estimate health-state utility from non-preference-based outcome measures: an ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force Report. Value Health 2017; 20(1): 18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.006
PROsetta Stone. Available from: https://www.prosettastone.org/ (accessed February 13, 2024).
Valsamis E M, Beard D, Carr A, Collins G S, Brealey S, Rangan A, et al. Mapping the Oxford Shoulder Score onto the EQ-5D utility index. Qual Life Res 2023; 32(2): 507-18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03262-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03262-4
Klug A, Herrmann E, Fischer S, Hoffmann R, Gramlich Y. Projections of primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty until 2040: facing a massive rise in fracture-related procedures. J Clin Med 2021; 10(21): 5123. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215123
Padegimas E M, Maltenfort M, Lazarus M D, Ramsey M L, Williams G R, Namdari S. Future patient demand for shoulder arthroplasty by younger patients: national projections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(6): 1860-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4231-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4231-z
Wagner E R, Farley K X, Higgins I, Wilson J M, Daly C A, Gottschalk M B. The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: rise and future projections compared with hip and knee arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29(12): 2601-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.049
Sullivan P W, Ghushchyan V. Mapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally representative sample. Med Decis Making 2006; 26(4): 401-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06290496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X06290496
Le Q A. Probabilistic mapping of the health status measure SF-12 onto the health utility measure EQ-5D using the US-population-based scoring models. Qual Life Res 2014; 23(2): 459-66. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0517-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0517-3
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ilana N Ackerman, Sze-Ee Soh, Brian R Hallstrom, Yi Ying Fang, Patricia Franklin, Jörg Lützner, Lina Holm Ingelsrud
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
