Reply to Letter: Identifying effective candidates for sacro-iliac joint fusion

Paul Gerdhem; Thomas Kibsgård; Engelke Randers

doi:10.2340/17453674.2024.41306

Authors

Paul Gerdhem Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden; Department of Hand Surgery and Orthopaedics, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8061-7163
Thomas Kibsgård Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Engelke Randers Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41306

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kurosawa D, Sturesson B. Letter to the Editor: Identifying effective candidates for sacro-iliac joint fusion. Acta Orthop 2024: 95: 460. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.41305

Mason L W, Chopra I, Mohanty K. The percutaneous stabilisation of the sacroiliac joint with hollow modular anchorage screws: a prospective outcome study. Eur Spine J 2013; 22: 2325-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2825-2.

Rudolf L. MIS fusion of the SI joint: does prior lumbar spinal fusion affect patient outcomes? Open Orthop J 2013; 7: 163-8. doi: 10.2174/1874325001307010163.

Randers E M, Kibsgard T J, Stuge B, Westberg A, Sigmundsson F G, Joelson A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after minimally invasive sacro-iliac joint surgery: a cohort study based on the Swedish Spine Registry. Acta Orthop 2024; 95: 284-9. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40817.

Randers E M, Gerdhem P, Stuge B, Diarbakerli E, Nordsletten L, Rohrl S M, et al. The effect of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion compared to sham operation: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 68: 102438. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102438.

Sturesson B, Kools D, Pflugmacher R, Gasbarrini A, Prestamburgo D, Dengler J. Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management. Eur Spine J 2017; 26: 708-19. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4599-9.

Whang P, Cher D, Polly D, Frank C, Lockstadt H, Glaser J, et al. Sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants vs. non-surgical management: six-month outcomes from a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Spine Surg 2015; 9: 6. doi: 10.14444/2006.

Capobianco R, Cher D, Group S S. Safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion in women with persistent post-partum posterior pelvic girdle pain: 12-month outcomes from a prospective, multi-center trial. Springerplus 2015; 4: 570. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1359-y.

Elkan P, Lagerback T, Moller H, Gerdhem P. Response rate does not affect patient-reported outcome after lumbar discectomy. Eur Spine J 2018; 27: 1538-46. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5541-0.

Endler P, Ekman P, Hellstrom F, Moller H, Gerdhem P. Minor effect of loss to follow-up on outcome interpretation in the Swedish spine register. Eur Spine J 2020; 29: 213-20. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06181-0.

Elmans L, Willems P C, Anderson P G, van Limbeek J, de Kleuver M, van der Schaaf D. Temporary external transpedicular fixation of the lumbosacral spine: a prospective, longitudinal study in 330 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 2813-16. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000190868.57106.4d.

Slätis P, Eskola A. External fixation of the pelvic girdle as a test for assessing instability of the sacro-iliac joint. Ann Med 1989; 21: 369-72. doi: 10.3109/07853898909149223.