Simultaneous correction of leg length discrepancy and angular deformity of the distal femur with retrograde Precice nails: a retrospective analysis of 45 patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40947Keywords:
Acute Deformity Correction, Angular Deformity, Blocking Screw, Gradual Bone Lengthening, Intramedullary Lengthening Nail, Leg Length Discrepancy, PRECICEAbstract
Background and purpose: Magnetically controlled motorized intramedullary lengthening nails (ILNs) can be employed for simultaneous correction of angular deformities of the distal femur and leg length discrepancy. This spares typical complications of external fixators but requires precise preoperative planning and exact intraoperative execution. To date, its results are insufficiently reported. We aimed to elucidate the following questions: (i) Is acute angular deformity correction and gradual femoral lengthening via a retrograde ILN a reliable and precise treatment option? (ii) What are the most common complications of treatment?
Methods: Acute angular deformity correction and subsequent gradual lengthening of the distal femur with retrograde ILN was retrospectively analyzed in 45 patients (median patient age: 15 years, interquartile range [IQR] 13–19 and median follow-up: 40 months, IQR 31–50). Outcome parameters were accuracy, precision, reliability, bone healing, and complications of treatment.
Results: The median distraction was 46 mm (IQR 29–49), median distraction and consolidation index 0.9 mm/day (IQR 0.7–1.0) and 29 days/cm (IQR 24–43), respectively. The median preoperative mechanical axis deviation (MAD) was 30 mm (IQR 23–39) in the varus cohort and –25 mm (IQR –29 to –15) in the valgus cohort and reduced to a mean of 8 mm (standard deviation [SD] 8) and –3 (SD 10), respectively. Accuracy, precision, and reliability of lengthening were 94%, 95% and 96%, respectively. Accuracy and precision of deformity correction were 92% and 89%, respectively. In total, 40/45 of patients achieved distraction with a difference of less than 1 cm from the initial plan and a postoperative MAD ranging from –10 mm to +15 mm. In 13/45 patients unplanned additional surgeries were conducted to achieve treatment goal with nonunion being the most frequent (4/45) and knee subluxation (3/45) the most severe complication.
Conclusion: Acute deformity correction and subsequent lengthening of the distal femur with retrograde ILN is a reliable and accurate treatment achieving treatment goal in 89% but unplanned additional surgeries in 29% of patients should be anticipated.
Downloads
References
Calder P R, McKay J E, Timms A J, Roskrow T, Fugazzotto S, Edel P, et al. Femoral lengthening using the Precice intramedullary limb-lengthening system: outcome comparison following antegrade and retrograde nails. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B: 1168-76. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B9.BJJ-2018-1271.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B9.BJJ-2018-1271.R1
Horn J, Hvid I, Huhnstock S, Breen A B, Steen H. Limb lengthening and deformity correction with externally controlled motorized intramedullary nails: evaluation of 50 consecutive lengthenings. Acta Orthop 2019; 90: 81-7. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1534321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1534321
Schiedel F M, Vogt B, Tretow H L, Schuhknecht B, Gosheger G, Horter M J, et al. How precise is the PRECICE compared to the ISKD in intramedullary limb lengthening? Reliability and safety in 26 procedures. Acta Orthop 2014; 85: 293-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.913955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.913955
Black S R, Kwon M S, Cherkashin A M, Samchukov M L, Birch J G, Jo C H. Lengthening in congenital femoral deficiency: a comparison of circular external fixation and a motorized intramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97: 1432-40. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00932
Laubscher M, Mitchell C, Timms A, Goodier D, Calder P. Outcomes following femoral lengthening: an initial comparison of the Precice intramedullary lengthening nail and the LRS external fixator monorail system. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-b: 1382-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.98b10.36643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.36643
Frommer A, Roedl R, Gosheger G, Niemann M, Turkowski D, Toporowski G, et al. What are the potential benefits and risks of using magnetically driven antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails for femoral lengthening to treat leg length discrepancy? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480(4): 790-803. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002036
Geiger E J, Geffner A D, Rozbruch S R, Fragomen A T. Treatment of angular deformity and limb length discrepancy with a retrograde femur magnetic intramedullary nail: a fixator-assisted, blocking screw technique. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2023; 7: e23.00053. doi: e23.0005310.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00053
Iobst C A, Rozbruch S R, Nelson S, Fragomen A. simultaneous acute femoral deformity correction and gradual limb lengthening using a retrograde femoral nail: technique and clinical results. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2018; 26: 241-50. doi: 10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00573
Laufer A, Frommer A, Gosheger G, Toporowski G, Rölfing J D, Antfang C, et al. Antegrade intramedullary femoral lengthening and distal temporary hemiepiphysiodesis for combined correction of leg length discrepancy and coronal angular deformity in skeletally immature patients. J Clin Med 2023; 12: 3022. doi: 10.3390/jcm12083022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12083022
Jardaly A, Gilbert S R. Combined antegrade femur lengthening and distal deformity correction: a case series. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16: 60. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02168-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02168-6
Muthusamy S, Rozbruch S R, Fragomen A T. The use of blocking screws with internal lengthening nail and reverse rule of thumb for blocking screws in limb lengthening and deformity correction surgery. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2016; 11: 199-205. doi: 10.1007/s11751-016-0265-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11751-016-0265-3
von Elm E, Altman D G, Egger M, Pocock S J, Gøtzsche P C, Vandenbroucke J P. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology 2007; 18: 800-4. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577654
Paley D. Normal lower limb alignment and jointorientation. In: Paley D, editor. Principles of deformity correction. Berlin: Springer; 2002. pp. 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59373-4_1
Baumgart R. The reverse planning method for lengthening of the lower limb using a straight intramedullary nail with or without deformity correction: s new method. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2009; 21: 221-33. doi: 10.1007/s00064-009-1709-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-009-1709-4
Vogt B, Lueckingsmeier M, Gosheger G, Laufer A, Toporowski G, Antfang C, et al. .Magnetically driven antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails for tibial lengthening. Bone Joint J 2024; 106-b: 293-302. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b3.Bjj-2023-0909.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B3.BJJ-2023-0909.R1
Brune C S, Toporowski G, Rölfing J D, Gosheger G, Fresen J, Frommer A, et al. German translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) questionnaire. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10: 1299. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071299
Teulières M, Langlais T, de Gauzy J S, Rölfing J D, Accadbled F. Bone lengthening with a motorized intramedullary nail in 34 patients with posttraumatic limb length discrepancies. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 2393. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112393
Wagner P, Burghardt R D, Green S A, Specht S C, Standard S C, Herzenberg J E. PRECICE(®) magnetically-driven, telescopic, intramedullary lengthening nail: pre-clinical testing and first 30 patients. Sicot J 2017; 3: 19. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2016048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2016048
Kirane Y M, Fragomen A T, Rozbruch S R. Precision of the PRECICE internal bone lengthening nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 3869-78. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3575-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3575-0
Karakoyun Ö, Küçükkaya M, Erol M F. Does lengthening after acute correction negatively affect bone healing during distraction osteogenesis? Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2015; 49: 405-9. doi: 10.3944/aott.2015.14.0275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0275
Liska F, Haller B, Voss A, Mehl J, Imhoff F B, Willinger L, et al. Smoking and obesity influence the risk of nonunion in lateral opening wedge, closing wedge and torsional distal femoral osteotomies. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26: 2551-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4754-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4754-9
Wright S E, Goodier W D, Calder P. Regenerate deformity with the Precice tibial nail. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2020; 15: 98-105. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1457
Frost M W, Rahbek O, Iobst C, Bafor A, Duncan M, Kold S. Complications and risk factors of intramedullary bone lengthening nails: a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 314 FITBONE and PRECICE nails. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 51-9. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.8479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.8479
Wylie J D, Jones D L, Hartley M K, Kapron A L, Krych A J, Aoki S K, et al. Distal femoral osteotomy for the valgus knee: medial closing wedge versus lateral opening wedge: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2016; 32: 2141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.04.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.04.010
Krieg A H, Dong C, Schmid M P, Speth B M, Harder D, Donners R. Long-term effects of retrograde approach on the knee after motorized femoral limb lengthening. Acta Orthop 2023; 94: 128-34. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.10323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.10323
Heath M R, Shin T J, Mehta R, Principe P S, Mackie A T, Fragomen A, et al. Patients with lower limb deformity report worse quality of life than control subjects regardless of degree of deformity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2021; 5: e21.00182. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00182
Galal S, Shin J, Principe P, Khabyeh-Hasbani N, Mehta R, Hamilton A, et al. STRYDE versus PRECICE magnetic internal lengthening nail for femur lengthening. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142(12): 3555-61. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03943-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03943-8
Fragomen A T, Falls T D, Suh J, Khabyeh-Hasbani N, Rozbruch S R. Tibial lengthening evolution: classic Ilizarov, lengthening and then nailing, motorized internal lengthening nail. J Limb Lengthening Reconstr 2020; 6: 13-19. doi: 10.4103/jllr.jllr_3_20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jllr.jllr_3_20
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bjoern Vogt, Caja Biermann, Georg Gosheger, Andrea Laufer, Anna Rachbauer, Carina Antfang, Milena Lueckingsmeier, Gregor Toporowski, Henning Tretow, Robert Roedl, Adrien Frommer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
