The neck–shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors

Jörn Lange; Cornelius S Fischer; Jens-Peter  Kühn; Henry  Völzke; Till Ittermann; Denis  Gümbel; Richard  Kasch; Lyubomir Haralambiev; René Laqua; Peter  Hinz

doi:10.1080/17453674.2019.1690873

Authors

Jörn Lange Clinic of Trauma, Reconstructive Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald
Cornelius S Fischer Clinic of Trauma, Reconstructive Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald
Jens-Peter Kühn Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald; Clinic and Policlinic of Radiology, University Hospital Dresden, Carl-Gustav-Carus University, Dresden, Germany
Henry Völzke Institute for Community Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, Greifswald
Till Ittermann Institute for Community Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, Greifswald
Denis Gümbel Clinic of Trauma, Reconstructive Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald
Richard Kasch Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine; Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald
Lyubomir Haralambiev Clinic of Trauma, Reconstructive Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald
René Laqua Department of Radiology, Städtisches Krankenhaus Kiel, Kiel
Peter Hinz Clinic of Trauma, Reconstructive Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1690873

Abstract

Background and purpose — The neck–shaft angle (NSA) is valuable for diagnostics and therapy of the hip, but current reference values derive mostly from studies on anatomic specimens, small cohorts, or are hospital-based. Moreover, associated factors such as age, sex, or anthropometric data have rarely been considered. Therefore, we determined associated factors for NSA and reassessed the historical reference values in a general adult population.

Methods — NSAs on both sides of 3,226 volunteers from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) were measured with MRI. SHIP drew a representative sample of the population of Pomerania (northeastern Germany). NSAs were compared with sex, age, and anthropometric data by bivariable linear regression models. Reference values were assessed by quantile regressions for 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles.

Results — The mean NSA was 127° (SD 7), while men had a lower NSA than women (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4°–1.4°). The reference range was 114°–140°. Age was inversely associated with NSA (CI –0.2 to –0.1). Body height was positively associated with the NSA, while BMI and waist circumference showed a negative association. There was no association between body weight and NSA.

Interpretation — The historical lower limit of 120° might be too high, so the radiological prevalence of hip pathology might have been overestimated. The previously reported influence of age, sex, and body height on the NSA has been confirmed.