Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for the degenerative meniscus tear: a comparison of patients included in RCTs and prospective cohort studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.24576Keywords:
Arthroscopy, Degenerative meniscus tear, IPDMA, Knee, Meniscectomy, OsteoarthritisAbstract
Background and purpose: Concerns exist regarding the generalizability of results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) to treat degenerative meniscus tears. It has been suggested that study populations are not representative of subjects selected for surgery in daily clinical practice. Therefore, we aimed to compare patients included in trials and prospective cohort studies that received APM for a degenerative meniscus tear.
Patients and methods: Individual participant data from 4 RCTs and 2 cohort studies undergoing APM were collected. 1,970 patients were analyzed: 605 patients included in RCTs and 1,365 included in the cohorts. We compared patient and disease characteristics, knee pain, overall knee function, and health-related quality of life at baseline between the RCT and cohort groups using standardized differences, ratios comparing the variance of continuous covariates, and graphical methods such as quantile–quantile plots, side-by-side boxplots, and non-parametric density plots.
Results: Differences between RCT and the cohort were observed primarily in age (younger patients in the cohort; standardized difference: 0.32) and disease severity, with the RCT group having more severe symptoms (standardized difference: 0.38). While knee pain, overall knee function, and quality of life generally showed minimal differences between the 2 groups, it is noteworthy that the largest observed difference was in knee pain, where the cohort group scored 7 points worse (95% confidence interval 5–9, standardized difference: 0.29).
Conclusion: Patients in RCTs were largely representative of those in cohort studies regarding baseline scores, though variations in age and disease severity were observed. Younger patients with less severe osteoarthritis were more common in the cohort; however, trial participants still appear to be broadly representative of the target population.
Downloads
References
Englund M, Roemer F W, Hayashi D, Crema M D, Guermazi A. Meniscus pathology, osteoarthritis and the treatment controversy. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2012; 8(7): 412-19. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2012.69
O’Connor D, Johnston R V, Brignardello-Petersen R, Poolman R W, Cyril S, Vandvik P O, et al. Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee disease (osteoarthritis including degenerative meniscal tears). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 3(3): CD014328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014328
Reito A, Harris I A, Karjalainen T. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: did it ever work? Acta Orthop 2021; 93: 1-10. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1979793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1979793
Rongen J J, van Tienen T G, Buma P, Hannink G. Meniscus surgery is still widely performed in the treatment of degenerative meniscus tears in The Netherlands. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26(4): 1123-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4473-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4473-2
Thorlund J B, Hare K B, Lohmander L S. Large increase in arthroscopic meniscus surgery in the middle-aged and older population in Denmark from 2000 to 2011. Acta Orthop 2014; 85(3): 287-92. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.919558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.919558
Jevsevar D S, Yates A J Jr, Sanders J O. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for degenerative meniscal tear. N Engl J Med 2014; 370(13): 1259-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1401128.
Elattrache N, Lattermann C, Hannon M, Cole B. New England Journal of Medicine article evaluating the usefulness of meniscectomy is flawed. Arthroscopy 2014; 30(5): 542-3. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.010
Krych A J, Stuart M J, Levy B A. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for degenerative meniscal tear. N Engl J Med 2014; 370(13): 1259-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1401128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1401128
Lubowitz J H, D’Agostino R B Jr, Provencher M T, Rossi M J, Brand J C. Can we trust knee meniscus studies? One-way crossover confounds intent-to-treat statistical methods. Arthroscopy 2016; 32(11): 2187-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.009
Kukull W A, Ganguli M. Generalizability: the trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology 2012; 78(23): 1886-91. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812
Sihvonen R, Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Järvinen T L. Finnish Degenerative Meniscal Lesion Study (FIDELITY): a protocol for a randomised, placebo surgery controlled trial on the efficacy of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for patients with degenerative meniscus injury with a novel ‘RCT within-a-cohort’ study design. BMJ Open 2013; 3(3): e002510. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002510
Thorlund J B, Christensen R, Nissen N, Jørgensen U, Schjerning J, Pørneki J C, et al. Knee Arthroscopy Cohort Southern Denmark (KACS): protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2013; 3(10): e003399. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003399
Bonell C, Oakley A, Hargreaves J, Strange V, Rees R. Assessment of generalisability in trials of health interventions: suggested framework and systematic review. BMJ 2006; 333(7563): 346-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7563.346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.333.7563.346
Wijn S R W, Hannink G, Østerås H, Risberg M A, Roos E M, Hare K B, et al. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy vs non-surgical or sham treatment in patients with MRI-confirmed degenerative meniscus tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis with individual participant data from 605 randomised patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2023; 31(5): 557-66. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2023.01.002
van de Graaf V A, Noorduyn J C A, Willigenburg N W, Butter I K, de Gast A, Mol B W, et al; ESCAPE Research Group. Effect of early surgery vs physical therapy on knee function among patients with nonobstructive meniscal tears: the ESCAPE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2018; 320(13): 1328-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.13308
Roos E M, Hare K B, Nielsen S M, Christensen R, Lohmander L S. Better outcome from arthroscopic partial meniscectomy than skin incisions only? A sham-controlled randomised trial in patients aged 35–55 years with knee pain and an MRI-verified meniscal tear. BMJ Open 2018; 8(2): e019461. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019461
Yim J H, Seon J K, Song E K, Choi J I, Kim M C, Lee K B, et al. A comparative study of meniscectomy and nonoperative treatment for degenerative horizontal tears of the medial meniscus. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41(7): 1565-70. doi: 10.1177/0363546513488518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513488518
Kise N J, Risberg M A, Stensrud S, Ranstam J, Engebretsen L, Roos E M. Exercise therapy versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for degenerative meniscal tear in middle aged patients: randomised controlled trial with two year follow-up. BMJ 2016; 354: i3740. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3740
Resche-Rigon M, White I R. Multiple imputation by chained equations for systematically and sporadically missing multilevel data. Stat Methods Med Res 2018; 27(6): 1634-49. doi: 10.1177/0962280216666564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280216666564
Andrade C. Mean difference, standardized mean difference (SMD), and their use in meta-analysis: as simple as it gets. J Clin Psychiatry 2020; 81(5): 20f13681. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20f13681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.20f13681
Austin P C. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 2009; 28(25): 3083-107. doi: 10.1002/sim.3697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3697
Krych A J, Carey J L, Marx R G, Dahm D L, Sennett B J, Stuart M J, et al. Does arthroscopic knee surgery work? Arthroscopy 2014; 30(5): 544-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.012
Price A, Beard D. Arthroscopy for degenerate meniscal tears of the knee. BMJ 2014; 348:g2382. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2382
Katz J N, Brophy R H, Chaisson C E, de Chaves L, Cole B J, Dahm D L, et al. Surgery versus physical therapy for a meniscal tear and osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med 2013; 368(18): 1675-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1301408
Sihvonen R, Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Itälä A, Joukainen A, Nurmi H, et al.; Finnish Degenerative Meniscal Lesion Study (FIDELITY) Group. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus sham surgery for a degenerative meniscal tear. N Engl J Med 2013; 369(26): 2515-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1305189
Abdelaziz H, Balde O M, Citak M, Gehrke T, Magan A, Haasper C. Kellgren–Lawrence scoring system underestimates cartilage damage when indicating TKA: preoperative radiograph versus intraoperative photograph. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139(9): 1287-92. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03223-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03223-6
Jolani S, Debray T P, Koffijberg H, van Buuren S, Moons K G. Imputation of systematically missing predictors in an individual participant data meta-analysis: a generalized approach using MICE. Stat Med 2015; 34(11): 1841-63. doi: 10.1002/sim.6451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6451
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Stan R W Wijn, Gerjon Hannink, Jonas B Thorlund, Raine Sihvonen, Martin Englund, Maroeska M Rovers, meniscus IPDMA collaboration group
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
