Hip function after total vs. surface replacement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678508994353Abstract
Kinesiologic measurements were made in two groups of 20 men before and 6 and 24 months after resurfacing or conventional replacement. Before surgery the group to have resurfacing was younger, had less pain, slightly more hip motion, greater muscle strength, walked faster, and used fewer assistive devices during walking than the group to have the conventional replacement. After surgery, the group with resurfacing maintained its advantage in muscle strength and walking velocity.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
1985-01-01
How to Cite
Gore, D. R., Murray, M. P., Gardner, G. M., & Sepic, S. B. (1985). Hip function after total vs. surface replacement. Acta Orthopaedica, 56(5), 386–390. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678508994353
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
