Hip function after total vs. surface replacement

Authors

  • Donald R. Gore
  • M. Patricia Murray
  • Gena M. Gardner
  • Susan B. Sepic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678508994353

Abstract

Kinesiologic measurements were made in two groups of 20 men before and 6 and 24 months after resurfacing or conventional replacement. Before surgery the group to have resurfacing was younger, had less pain, slightly more hip motion, greater muscle strength, walked faster, and used fewer assistive devices during walking than the group to have the conventional replacement. After surgery, the group with resurfacing maintained its advantage in muscle strength and walking velocity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1985-01-01

How to Cite

Gore, D. R., Murray, M. P., Gardner, G. M., & Sepic, S. B. (1985). Hip function after total vs. surface replacement. Acta Orthopaedica, 56(5), 386–390. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678508994353