Penicillin G versus cefuroxime for prophylaxis in lower limb amputation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678709146511Abstract
Out of 457 patients amputated below or above the knee, we randomized 228 to receive penicillin G and 229 cefuroxime as prophylaxis against infection. We also stratified the patients into two groups: Group A (313 patients) who did not receive antibiotic treatment within 48 hours prior to the operation and Group B (88 patients) who did. There were 56 dropouts according to protocol regulations. The patients were evaluated for efficacy on the 21st postoperative day. In Group A, 20 of 158 (13 per cent) penicillin G-treated and 27 of 155 (17 per cent) cefuroxime-treated had wound sepsis; 5 (3 per cent) penicillin G-treated and 4 (3 per cent) cefuroxime-treated patients had been reampu-tated by Day 21 (P > 0.05). We concluded that prophylactic penicillin G prevents infection as effectively as cefuroxime after lower limb amputation.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
1987-01-01
How to Cite
Friis, H. (1987). Penicillin G versus cefuroxime for prophylaxis in lower limb amputation. Acta Orthopaedica, 58(6), 666–668. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678709146511
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
