Fixation of unstable trochanteric hip fractures: A cadaver study comparing three different devices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678809149419Abstract
A four-fragment trochanteric fracture was produced in 24 human cadaver femora. After reduction to anatomic position, the fractures were stabilized by either a Jewett 135°nail-plate, a 135°Nolok™ sliding screw-plate without a key, or a 140°Hansson pin-plate with an additional trochanteric plate. Using a hip-force simulator, the preparations were subjected to 10,000 loading cycles simulating partial weight bearing, followed by another 10,000 cycles with full weight bearing, while measuring the elastic and permanent fracture displacements. Failure occurred in 3/8 of the Jewett stabilized fractures and in 1/8 each of the Nolok°and Hansson stabilized specimens. Each failure was preceded by an increase in elastic tilt and rotation followed by a permanent rotation after which failure occurred as varus angulation of the fracture. Further, two Jewett nails, one Nolok™ screw, and three Hansson pins showed bending. Due to the controlled telescopic action in the Nolok™ and Hansson dynamic devices, the resistance to fatigue when subjected to repetitive loadings was increased and thereby a better overall result was achieved when compared with the rigid Jewett nail-plate. To maintain the dynamic function, the strength of the dynamic screw-pin must be sufficient to withstand physiologic loadings without bending; otherwise, the telescopic action will be obstructed.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
1988-01-01
How to Cite
Larsson, S., Elloy, M., & Hansson, L.-L. (1988). Fixation of unstable trochanteric hip fractures: A cadaver study comparing three different devices. Acta Orthopaedica, 59(6), 658–663. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678809149419
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
