Internal fixation of 410 cervical hip fractures: A randomized comparison of a single nail versus two hook-pins
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679008993551Abstract
Totally, 410 patients with a cervical hip fracture were randomized between two methods of osteosynthesis: a single nail (Rydell) and two hook-pins (LIH). Seventy-five percent of the patients were women. Sixty-nine percent were alive after 2 years. The patients were followed up with clinical and radiographic examinations for 2 years postoperatively. No differences between the two groups were found regarding quality of reduction, early displacement within 3 months, extraction after healing, nonunion, late segmental collapse, or reoperation with a total hip arthroplasty. Nor did we find any differences between the two groups when selecting those alive after 2 years or when dividing the fractures in displaced and nondisplaced fractures.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
1990-01-01
How to Cite
Sernbo, I., Johnell, O., Bååth, L., & Nilsson, J.- Åke. (1990). Internal fixation of 410 cervical hip fractures: A randomized comparison of a single nail versus two hook-pins. Acta Orthopaedica, 61(5), 411–414. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679008993551
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
