Internal fixation of 410 cervical hip fractures: A randomized comparison of a single nail versus two hook-pins

Authors

  • Ingemar Sernbo
  • Olof Johnell
  • Lars Bååth
  • Jan-Åke Nilsson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679008993551

Abstract

Totally, 410 patients with a cervical hip fracture were randomized between two methods of osteosynthesis: a single nail (Rydell) and two hook-pins (LIH). Seventy-five percent of the patients were women. Sixty-nine percent were alive after 2 years. The patients were followed up with clinical and radiographic examinations for 2 years postoperatively. No differences between the two groups were found regarding quality of reduction, early displacement within 3 months, extraction after healing, nonunion, late segmental collapse, or reoperation with a total hip arthroplasty. Nor did we find any differences between the two groups when selecting those alive after 2 years or when dividing the fractures in displaced and nondisplaced fractures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1990-01-01

How to Cite

Sernbo, I., Johnell, O., Bååth, L., & Nilsson, J.- Åke. (1990). Internal fixation of 410 cervical hip fractures: A randomized comparison of a single nail versus two hook-pins. Acta Orthopaedica, 61(5), 411–414. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679008993551