Bioactive glass versus hydroxylapatite in reconstruction of osteochondral defects in the rabbit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679308994597Abstract
We studied osseointegration of a bioactive glass (BG) and hydroxylapatite (HA) in rabbit femur epiphyseal and metaphyseal regions. 17 BG and 24 HA cones implanted in defects through arthrotomy were analyzed. The holes for implants were drilled through distal femur joint surfaces. The cartilage wound repaired generally by fibrous tissue. Histomorphometry showed that 61, 78, and 79 percent of BG surface was covered by bone at 3, 6, and 12 weeks, respectively. The corresponding figures for HA were 47, 67, and 78 percent. Chemical bonding between bone and implants of both types was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive x-ray analysis (EDXA). Formation of a calcium phosphate-rich layer on the surface BG implant was demonstrated by EDXA. Our results indicate that the osseointegration rate of bioactive glass does not differ from that of hydroxylapatite.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
1993-01-01
How to Cite
Heikkilä, J. T., Aho, A. J., Yli-Urpo, A., Andersson, örjan H., Aho, H. J., & Happonen, R.-P. (1993). Bioactive glass versus hydroxylapatite in reconstruction of osteochondral defects in the rabbit. Acta Orthopaedica, 64(6), 678–682. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679308994597
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
