Laxity after cruciate ligament injury in 94 knees: The KT-1000 arthrometer versus roentgen stereophotogrammetry

Authors

  • Håkan Jonsson
  • Johan Kärrholm
  • Lars-Gunnar Elmqvist

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679308993694

Abstract

We examined 94 knees with chronic anterior cruciate ligament injuries, 55 of which had been operated with ligament reconstruction, using the KT-1000 arthrometer (89 N anterior force) and roentgen stereophotogrammetry (RSA, 150 N anterior, 80 N posterior force). In intact knees the tibial displacement did not differ between the methods. In injured knees, operated or not, the KT-1000 recorded smaller AP translations and side-differences than RSA. Thus, the stabilizing effect of reconstructive surgery may be overrated, if evaluated with the standard KT-1000 technique.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1993-01-01

How to Cite

Jonsson, H., Kärrholm, J., & Elmqvist, L.-G. (1993). Laxity after cruciate ligament injury in 94 knees: The KT-1000 arthrometer versus roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Acta Orthopaedica, 64(5), 567–570. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679308993694