Treatment of tibial and femoral bone loss by distraction osteogenesis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.1997.11744753Abstract
42 patients with diaphyseal bone defects (25 tibial and 17 femoral) who were treated by radical debridement and bone transport are reviewed. Their mean age was 35 (10–64) years and there were 29 men. 19 patients had active infections with drainage and 9 were previously infected. After resection of the infected and necrotic bone, the intercalate defect averaged 6 (3–12) cm. The mean duration of treatment was 10 (20–52) months. Regeneration of the distraction gap was achieved in all 42 patients. Union at the target zone was achieved in 38, and in the remaining 4 cases consolidation was achieved by application of autogenous bone grafts. The infection was eradicated in all 28 patients treated for bone defects associated with infection, without the need for a second operation. Complications were not severe and did not affect the final results. Residual malalignment remained in 2 patients, 1 femur and 1 tibia, with 10° and 8° of varus deformity, respectively. The final leg-length discrepancy never exceeded 1.5 cm. Residual fixed flexion of the knee was left in 5 cases, but never exceeded 10°. Loss of 5° to 10° of dorsiflexion of the ankle join remained in 7 patients. There were no intraoperative or postoperative neurovascular damage or compartment syndrome. Psychological intolerance was seen in 1 young patient. All patients, but 3 returned to their previous occupation. Bone transport is a simple and safe method for successful treatment of diaphyseal bone defects.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
1997-01-01
How to Cite
Polyzois, D., Papachristou, G., Kotsiopoulos, K., & Plessas, S. (1997). Treatment of tibial and femoral bone loss by distraction osteogenesis. Acta Orthopaedica, 68(sup275), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.1997.11744753
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Acta Orthopaedica (Scandinavica) content is available freely online as from volume 1, 1930. The journal owner owns the copyright for all material published until volume 80, 2009. As of June 2009, the journal has however been published fully Open Access, meaning the authors retain copyright to their work. As of June 2009, articles have been published under CC-BY-NC or CC-BY licenses, unless otherwise specified.
